Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 38 Next »

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.

Info

Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
Use the Wiki to document the release plan. Don't provide PowerPoint.
Use as much diagrams and flow charts as you need, directly in the wiki, to convey your message.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameBeijing
Project Lifecycle StateIncubation
Participating Company AT&T, Intel, Netcracker, VMWare (in lexical order)

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

This release of OOF addresses a core ONAP requirement, which is Homing/Placement of VNFs and Services (VNF Homing Capability). Placement and allocation of resources is one of the fundamental requirements of provisioning a service over the cloud (or even non-cloud) infrastructure. OOF-HAS is a policy-driven placement optimizing service (or homing service) that allows ONAP to deploy services automatically across multiple sites and multiple clouds. It enables placement based on a wide variety of policy constraints including capacity, location, platform capabilities, and other service specific requirements. More details on HAS can be found here: Homing and Allocation Service (HAS). This release also provides the Optimization Design framework (runtime) that supports the Homing Optimizer. 

Use Cases

While homing is critical to almost all use cases, we primarily focus on the Residential vCPE use case for the Beijing release. For these use cases, homing would be required during the Generic Service Instantiation Flow (Generic Service.png), where the SO would call HAS for homing right after the service decomposition block. More details on the homing requirements for the vCPE use case, including the API interactions can be found here: vCPE Homing Use Case.

We are currently working on defining similar requirements and workflows for the VOLTE use case as well. Some initial discussions on where and how homing would be integrated in the instantiation workflow for the VOLTE use case can be found in the comments section here: Use Case: VoLTE(approved).

Minimum Viable Product

  • OOF-HAS - Homing Service (runtime) that can be provides optimized placement based on policy constraints, across multiple clouds and multiple sites. 
  • OOF-OSDF - Optimization Design framework (runtime) that supports HAS, the Homing Optimizer. 

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh


Longer term roadmap


As the ONAP platform matures and new capabilities are introduced over time, the need for platform optimization services will grow along with it. The ONAP Optimization Framework is envisioned to handle this need as effectively as possible, by enabling creation of new optimization services with minimal or little new code development. The goal of OOF is to provide

(i) a growing set of core platform optimization services such as VNF placement and resource allocation (OOF-HAS), change management scheduling (OOF-CMSO), etc. 

(ii) a framework  (OOF-OSDF) that allow users to construct new optimization services and to extend/enhance existing platform optimization services.

Vision for OSDF:

OOF-OSDF is envisioned to be a collection of design time optimization libraries along with reusable runtime tools and microservices to facilitate and simplify the creation of new specific runtime optimization functionalities. The goal of OSDF is to avoid siloed optimization tools and associated duplicated efforts and overheads. For instance, the Homing Service, HAS (which is targeted for Beijing release) will not only contribute its reusable components to the framework, but also leverages the framework in its own feature development. Other potential optimization services that can be built using this framework include energy optimization in networks, optimal route selection for various network services, and radio access network (RAN) performance optimization. 

Vision for HAS:

OOF-HAS, or the Homing Service is a distributed resource broker that enables automated policy-driven optimized placement of services on a global heterogeneous platform using ONAP. HAS is architected as an extensible homing service that can accommodate a growing set of homing objectives, policy constraints, data sources and placement algorithms. It is service-agnostic by design and can easily onboard new services with minimal effort. HAS is designed to be used as a building block for both initial deployment, as well as runtime redeployment due to failures or runtime-capacity increase (scale-out). While the immediate deliverable of HAS in Beijing Release is to provide optimized homing/placement of services during the service instantiation workflows in ONAP,  HAS naturally extends to a general policy-driven optimizing placement platform for all platform placement functions, including placements of VMs, containers (e.g., for DCAE micro-services), ONAP Control Loops or VNF specific resources. HAS will also eventually allow placements of additional resource types such as licenses, VNF resources, etc.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
OOF-HAS

Executable, and source code for the Homing Service for the ONAP platform

OOF-OSDFExecutable and source code that provides optimization design framework support to optimizers like HAS.
OOF-HAS policy/data pluginsPlugins that help retrieve homing policies from the Policy framework, and the data required for homing from AAI, MultiCloud, SDNC.
Homing Specification guideA document that describes how homing policies can be created using the homing specification language (OF-HAS Homing Specification Guide)
API GuideTo document the APIs exported in R2


Sub-Components

  • OOF-HAS - Homing Service that can be provides optimized placement based on policy constraints, across multiple clouds and multiple sites. 
  • OOF-OSDF - Optimization Design framework that supports HAS, the Homing Optimizer


ONAP Dependencies

The following are the dependencies for the project based on the scope for the Beijing Release. The required dependencies have been identified based on the current homing requirements for the vCPE use case, and the potential dependencies are tentative dependencies that may exist based on how the information required for homing (e.g., Hardware Platform Enablement, VIM attributes) is available. 

Architecture

OOF Alignment with ONAP Target Architecture (Projects view):

OOF-HAS High level architecture diagram:

Sequence Diagram showing OOF interaction with other ONAP components during the Service Instantiation workflow of SO:

Platform Maturity

OOF is currently a non-MVP project, and is an incubation project in the Beijing release cycle (seed-code is upstreamed in this release). Therefore, some of the "Actual levels" for the platform maturity indicate a level 0, which is commensurate with the project's current incubation status. Our goal is to align with the Architecture committee's recommendation on using common tools/libraries for platform maturity, and therefore we will be dependent on the tools/libraries provided by these projects to achieve some of these targets. The Architecture Subcommittee's recommendations for the projects on achieving the platform maturity can be found here (ONAP Beijing Architecture Jan 9b.pptx). 

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance0

1

OPTFRA-35 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • Will need to work with the Benchmarking team to define baseline criteria for Optimization requests.
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability01

OPTFRA-36 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency12

OPTFRA-37 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • Seed-code natively supports manual failure and recovery. In R2, OOF components are stateless (or can rebuild cached state during runtime), and no rollbacks are required. This may change when reservations are supported in R3 and beyond.
  • Will need work with OOM/Music team to understand the tools/mechanisms they will be providing for Runtime projects for automated failure detection and recovery.
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security0

1

OPTFRA-38 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • Since the seed-code is being on-boarded as a part of Beijing release, we plan to reach 30% code coverage in R2, with a stretch goal of 50% code coverage.
  • Will need help with CII badging.
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability0

1


OPTFRA-39 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • Need to work with OOM team to identify ways support for single site horizontal scaling.
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability0

1


OPTFRA-40 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • Need to work with the Logging team for their recommendations. The two components of OOF (OSDF and HAS) needs to use the same logging system.
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability11

OPTFRA-41 - Getting issue details... STATUS

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation

API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)Status
PolicyPolicy Client API to create, update and retrieve homing policies.TBDTBD

work in progress, JIRA stories being created.

POLICY-56 - Getting issue details... STATUS

AAIREST Web Service provided by AAI, to query available cloud-regions, and existing service instances where a new order can be placed.Primarily dependent on the R1 REST API. Currently working with AAI on making HPA capabilities available.TBD

                      aai_rest_api_doc_v11.html


work in progress for HPA capabilities, JIRA stories being created
MultiCloudAPI to retrieve VIM capacities (infrastructure metrics model)TBDTBD
work in progress, JIRA stories being created

API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)Status
HAS APIAPI to submit homing requests, and retrieve homing solutions.TBDTBD
JIRA stories are being created in SO to replace R1 Homing stubs with the actual HAS API

Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

Testing and Integration Plans

The following type of tests will be ensured for OOF in this release:

  • Unit tests: Unit tests will be added incrementally as part of code delivery ensuring static code analysis as recommended by common SW delivery practices. OOF is written in Python, so coverage target percentage will be evaluated along project. Unit Tests will be automated, so that execution will happen before every OOF delivery. This includes writing test cases for the new components and those for the existing ones not yet covered under unit testing. A python based Unit Testing framework will be integrated into the project, binding all developers to start with Unit Tests when developing each module.
  • CSIT Test cases: OOF will be integrated following Continuous System Integration Testing test cases practice. This will ensure both Sanity test cases execution and Functional Test execution (details are provided in further chapters here below). CSIT test cases will be executed integrating OOF with Robot Framework and Jenkins.
  • Functional Test cases: OOF will be tested according to specific “concrete” optimization scenarios committed as “functional” part of OOF delivery. In particular vCPE optimization has been identified as concrete scenario, so a dedicated test suite will be set up to verify expectations are met. This will imply a proper set of simulators will be available to fulfill the whole vCPE optimization flow: Policy simulator, AAI simulator, SDNC Simulator, Music Simulator. for vCPE management. Functional test cases (or a meaningful subset) will be part of CSIT Test cases.  
  • End to End Test cases: OOF will be integrated within the whole ONAP components architecture and dedicated set of E2E test cases will be setup. Purpose, scope and details on E2E testing will be planned/defined subsequently by working with the Integration team, and for the test cases in the scope of this release.  

Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
To fill outTo fill out

Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out

Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out

Documentation, Training

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

  • No labels