Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Proposed meeting logistics:

Feb-22-2022, 2PM UTC, 

Bridge info: https://zoom.us/j/97595070639?pwd=ajFTZGdlTmRVNjU5MSt1YVpycmlrdz09 (MODCOM bridge)

Contacts: ETSI NFV (Bruno), ONAP CNF TF (Catherine), ONAP MODCOM (Xu), ONAP-NFV Contact (Thinh)

Tentative Agenda (information sharing and no decision making):

- Brief update from ETSI-NFV project (5 minutes)

- Brief overview of CNF Direct project (5 minutes)

- Detail on ASD concept, IM/DM and packaging. (30 minutes)

- Q&A (20 minutes)

- AoB

Meeting materials



Meeting Minutes:

1) ETSI-NFV alignment work in ONAP (Byung-woo):

issue find:

  • vdu doesn't match well with vf-module concept in ONAP
  • purpose of S-VNFM is questioned
  • VNFD and Helm Charts have duplicate information

2) CNF direct path project (Lukasz):

3) ASD model proposal (Thinh and Marian):

  • ASD is an alternative approach compared with the current SOL001 VNFD model
  • one of the key intention is to avoid duplication with Helm

4) Q&A:

  • Bruno:
    • 1) in ETSI-NFV alignment, does the implementation imply no Helm Charts are included? A: no implementation yet
    • 2) how to support cluster selection among several compute resources? A: the helm charts can support them
  • Shitao:
  • Thinh:
    • clarify if the analysis is individual contribution? A: yes
  • Cristina:
    • it's good to have the discussion on the merge, but in principle the 2 approaches are different
  • Bruno:
    • merge of the models and merge of the orchestration methods are seperate topics
    • it would be good if we can have single model and orchestration methods in the industry
    • ask why Thinh is negative on having single model/orchestration method?
      • Marian: philosophy are different for ASD and VNFD
    • whether the info captured in ASD should be added into the VNFD
  • Hui:
    • agree with Bruno that we could have another session to further discuss the proposals, involving more ETSI delegates
    • there are many commonalities between the two models, not suggesting ONAP to copy the models while just changing the names
  • Kuno:
    • Because network information as Virtual Link is very important for telecom application, how to describe these network information by ASD and how/who can connect VNF to operator network which had several issue in past in ETSI-NFV? What is different concept between ASD and VNFD when consider these network aspects ?
  • Bruno:
    • suggest to use the gotomeeting bridge for another session
    • 4. Is the ASD really technology independent? there are several references to K8S in the IM
    • 5. You said ASD will support the CNF direct model. Can you elaborate on this?
    • 6. Will the changes made to SOL004 be proposed to ETSI? Will the new 5G non-MANO-artifact be registered?
  • No labels