This template should be filled out for any project wishing to move to the "Mature" phase of the ONAP project lifecycle. It should be copied under the Project Maturity Reviews page & completed. Once complete, the requestor should send the link to the onap-tsc mailing list to initiate the maturity review. Further information: Project Reviews
FYI, per the ONAP Technical Community Document, the metrics for maturity review are:
›Successful participation in releases: The project demonstrates stable output (code base, documents) within its history of releases in accordance with the release policy.
›Architecture has been reviewed by the Architecture Committee
›Project is active and contributes to ONAP: The project demonstrates a stable or increasing number of contributions across recent releases. Contributions are commits which got merged to a repository of an ONAP project or a related upstream project. Commits can for example be patches to update the requirements document of a project, code addition to an ONAP or upstream project repository, new test cases and so forth.
›Mature artifacts produced: The project demonstrates that the artifacts produced by the project are deployable (where applicable) and have been successfully deployed, configured and used by end users (typically, service providers).
Project Name:
Project Description:
- Provide high level description of the project
Leadership Resources :
Role | First Name Last Name | Linux Foundation ID | Email Address |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTL | pdragosh | ||
| Committers | jhh | ||
| liamfallon | |||
| ramverma | |||
| jrh3 |
Project & Release History
The Policy Framework Project has been an active ONAP Project since Amsterdam and has participated in ALL releases through Frankfurt.
Use Case Participation
The key use cases that the Policy Framework project has contributed to are the following:
vFirewall
Scale Out
vCPE
CCVPN
5G OOF SON
BBS
Bitergia Statistics from the Last 2 Years
| Release Name and Timeframe | Commits | Contributors | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam | 713 | 38 | 8 |
| Beijing | 631 | 36 | 6 |
| Casablanca | 720 | 28 | 10 |
| Dublin | 1053 | 45 | 13 |
| El Alto | 426 | 28 | 5 |
| Frankfurt | 1269 | 38 | 8 |
Architecture Alignment:
Last Architecture Review was for Frankfurt on 12/17/2019 with the results posted here: Policy R6 Frankfurt Architecture Review
Artifact Information:
- Describe & provide links to the artifacts (code, test cases, documentation) that the project has created.
| Artifact | Repo | Line Coverage | Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| policy/parent | https://github.com/onap/policy-parent | n/a | Our main parent repo that contains shared dependency/pom.xml configurations for all the repos | |
| policy/docker | https://github.com/onap/policy-docker | n/a | Builds the base docker images for all the policy repos. | |
| policy/common | https://github.com/onap/policy-common | 86.9% | Common code shared among the policy repos. | |
| policy/models | https://github.com/onap/policy-models | 92% | Model code shared among the policy repos. | |
| policy/api | https://github.com/onap/policy-api | 91% | Lifecycle API component. | |
| policy/pap | https://github.com/onap/policy-pap | 94.7% | Policy Administration Point component. | |
| policy/apex-pdp | https://github.com/onap/policy-apex-pdp | 81.1% | Apex PDP engine component. | |
| policy/drools-pdp | https://github.com/onap/policy-drools-pdp | 76.1% | Drools PDP engine component. This is a vanilla version that does not include ONAP application code. | |
| policy/xacml-pdp | https://github.com/onap/policy-xacml-pdp | 90.3% | XACML PDP engine component and Decision API implementation. | |
| policy/distribution | https://github.com/onap/policy-distribution | 80.9% | Policy SDC Distribution component. | |
| policy/drools-apps | https://github.com/onap/policy-drools-applications | 84.8% https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=onap_policy-drools-applications | Drools PDP engine component that includes ONAP applications. | |
| policy/engine | https://github.com/onap/policy-engine | 55.1% | Legacy Policy components from Amsterdam seed code. | Will be deprecated in Guilin |
| policy/gui | https://github.com/onap/policy-gui | 47.9% https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=onap_policy-gui&metric=line_coverage&view=list | Newly introduced in Frankfurt, this repo contains GUI code. Currently only a PDP Monitoring GUI is available for experimentation. | Remains experimental PoC for Guilin. Expected to boost code coverage in Guilin. |
Integration Testing Support
The Policy Team supports the Integration vFirewall Use Case Testing every release and contributes changes to the Integration Robot Framework and Testsuite when updates are necessary.
Some example JIRA's for this:
INT-319 - Getting issue details... STATUS
INT-445 - Getting issue details... STATUS
INT-1350 - Getting issue details... STATUS
integration/oparent support
Policy team members support the Integration oparent project
Team actively supports oparent checkstyle in all our repos. Our verify jobs are configured to fail on any checkstyle violation vs the default 'warn' only.
Companies that run ONAP Policy internally
To our knowledge, the following companies have used ONAP Policy Framework internally: AT&T, Ericsson, Bell Canada, Tech Mahindra, Wipro.
Other Information:
ONAP Policy Framework has had topics and demo's at the ONAP Developer and LFN ONES conferences. Here is a list of recent demo's:
2019-06-12 LFN DDF Plugfest Kista, Sweden
2019-09-23-25 ONS at Antwerp, Belgium Policy Framework Demonstration - won Best Demo Award!
2020-01-15 LF ONAP Prague DDF Policy Framework - Frankfurt Improvements
2020-04-23 LF Virtual Technical Event - Policy Framework Overview
Control Loop Sub Committee:
The Policy Framework Project has been active in the Control Loop subcommittee from its inception. Working very closely with CLAMP and DCAE to support the automation and enhancement of Control Loops in ONAP.
The project shares weekly meetings with the CLAMP Project.