Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 13 Next »


The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameDublin
Project Lifecycle StateIncubation,  Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company AT&T Ericsson, Nokia, China Mobile, Amdocs

Scope

What is this release trying to address?


The Dublin release of AAF project will address the following items:

  • bug fixes, maintenance and feature alignment
  • increased stability of running AAF in K8s environment
    • Enhance AAF Locator to handle Internal and External access information
  • helping ONAP Services engage with AAF generated Certificates and clients
  • (Stretch Goal) Provide CMPv2 Cert APIs for VNFs


Note: AAF already has Silver CII Badging https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/2303

Use Cases

ONAP Services will be able to engage AAF Configuration as a "Init Container", prior to starting, which will give them certificates, etc.

Both External and Internal services will be able to utilize AAF Locator to find AAF Resources in ONAP

(Stretch Goal) Present AAF Locator solution as part of Scalability/Resiliency initiatives

(Stretch Goal) Be able to generate Certificates for VNFs with CMPv2 Protocol

Minimum Viable Product

The ONAP AAF Project will deliver the following documentation as its minimum viable product:

AAF's 7 Microservices, running in OOM

AAF Documentation

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
Enhanced LocatorBe able to provide Location info for Internal ONAP services and External Access

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.

aaf-service

aaf-locator

aaf-oauth

aaf-cm

aaf-gui

aaf-fs

aaf-hello


Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram


Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance12 (Stretch Target may not reach)AAF audit trails all transactions. With Dublin, we want to add additional Performance testing in ONAP, not just originating company.
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability23AAF has clean record of Uptime in initial Company. Only need to finish work to have this happen in K8S
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency23See AAF Locator
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security22CII Badge: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/2303
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability23AAF Locator changes allows for High Scale. Will be bringing to Architecture.
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability11It is possible that in doing other OOM integration, we'll improve this as a matter of course.
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability12 (Stretch, depends on def of Usability Testing)https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/guides/onap-provider/index.html
  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation


  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.

AAF is Infrastructure.  As such, it does not expect input from other projects.


  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

      API is included in GUI 

  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...). 

 Cassandra, Version 3.11  (Note: The expectation is that users of AAF may have their own Cassandra installations.  Chances are, Datastax client is compatible if near this version)



  • Testing and Integration Plans

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Junits

CSIT (automated functional tests)



  • Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
To fill outTo fill out
  • Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

(Note: Many bugs may be related to Side Tools (like SSM or Side-Car), which are add-ons, and do not necessarily affect ONAP functionality as a whole)

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan

CMP interface integration

requested. No pre-built CMP Java

libraries have been identified.

Further research.See how long it takes to implement CMP v2 elements from scratch
  • Resources

Fill out AAF Resources centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Documentation, Training

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.


  • No labels