Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 108 Current »

Based on timeplan of modeling subcommittee, high level requirements need to be finished by M0, 

There are 4 categories of high level requirement,

The first category is that those requirement will be implemented and commited by the impacted projects in this release

the second category will document the current implementation in those projects.

Other two categories like lower priority and experimental will not be included in the release 3, the contributor will work with best effort to influence future release.

Owners of each requirement needs to coordinate the modeling spec commitment and code commitment with PTLs of impacted project.

1) Will be implemented and included in the release 3


Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirementOwner

Resource

VNFD

ONAP Resource Data Model for Design Time?

-Agreement that the VNF Descriptor model for On-Boarding and the Internal ONAP models are distinct. (note: an internal model may be used as one of the on-boarding options)
•For R3 the VNF Descriptor On-Boarding options include: HEAT and TOSCA (SOL004 v2.5.1 VNF Package, ONAP R3 Resource DM) (see note)
-Acknowledgement that there are two Internal ONAP VNF Descriptor Data Models that, for R3, will evolve wherever possible in a coordinated way in support of the Casablanca Use Cases
•ONAP R2+ Design-Time Resource DM clean version enhancements for VoLTE, CCVPN, vCPE (stretch goal)
•ONAP SDC TOSCA AID enhancements for vCPE
-Engage impacted ONAP Components to understand the VNF Descriptor aspects of these two Internal ONAP R3 Resource Data Models are applied
•Document ONAP R3 VNFD on-boarding and internal models roadmap with all ONAP components stakeholders

SDC

A&AI

OOF

SO

VFC

Policy

VoLTE

VCPE

CCVPN

AT&T

Intel

AT&T

Intel

AT&T: High

SDC (Y)

A&AI (Y)

SO (Y)

OOF(Y)

Policy (Y)

VFC (Y)

 PNF for 5G

 software version


SDC

SO

 5G
 Nokia

SDC (Y)

SO (Y)



2) Documentation after implemented, or implemented but not in the release

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

Mapping to M1 requirement Owner

 Service

 

Service Order

It includes the definition of the managed objects that allows a BSS system to create/delete/update/get an order of a service to a ONAP instance. The Service Order Modeling provided by Ext API R2 team must be reviewed to become part of the ONAP common service IM

(Service Order - Information Model View)

Ext API(y)

VoLTE

CCVPN

Change Mgt


CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon

Orange

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

Orange

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  High

Verizon-High

ExtAPI

(Y)

Andy Mayer (AT&T)

 Service Catalog A Service Catalog is a group of ServiceDescriptors that an organization provides to the consumers via ONAP.

https://wiki.mef.net/display/CESG/Service+Catalog

Ext API VoLTE

CCVPN

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon

Orange

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Orange

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  High

Verizon-High

ExtAPI

(Y)

 Kevin Scaggs (AT&T)

 Service Descriptor

Design time model: service descriptor model,

document the existing service model in SDC

Ext API

SO

SDC

(All)

VoLTE

CCVPN

5G

vCPE

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon

Orange

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Orange

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T: High

Verizon-High

SDC (Y)

EXTAPI(Y)

SO(Y)

LIN MENG

(CMCC)

Resource  LicensePresently modeled and used in SDC,

(ONAP license model)

SDC (No impact, information providing only)


 AT&T

Verizon


 AT&T:  Medium

Verizon-Medium

SDC (Y) Kevin Scaggs(AT&T)
Alloted resource

1 document the existing SDCs current implementation

2 continue to work on the feature. (maybe some implementation will follow these features)

SDC AllAT&T

Intel

AT&T

Intel

AT&T: High SDC (Y)

Andy Mayer (AT&T)

Scaling (HEAT template) Scaling Use Case Extension .

Casablanca focus: Document the Policy Model that is being implemented by the ONAP Policy Framework.

SDC (no impact)

A&AI (no impact)

SO (no impact)

Policy

Clamp (no impact)

 vDNS (Scaling)

AT&T


CMCC: Medium

Vodafone: Medium

AT&T:  High

SDC (no impact)

A&AI (no impact)

SO (no impact)

Policy (Y)

Clamp (no impact)

 Andy Mayer (AT&T)

Gil Bullard ((AT&T)

ResourceComposite
  • the composition relationship between different resources which is implemented by the current SDC code shall be documented
  • the semantics rules of the current SDC/VNFSDK implementation shall be documented; potential new rules would be captured and brought back to SDC for the next release
SDC

VNFSDK(y)

 VoLTE

CCVPN

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon

Intel

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE Intel

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  High

Verizon-High

SDC (Y)

VNFSDK

(Y)

 Network Service

1 create a data model for network service

SDC

VFC

VoLTE

CCVPN

5G

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

AT&T

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

 CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  Medium

SDC (Y)

VFC (Y)

 guochuyi

Telemetry

Events & VES

VES Event Descriptor Model according to VES spec v6.0

DCAE

SDC


AT&T

Verizon


AT&T:  High

Verizon-High

DCAE(Y)

SDC (Y)


Below tables are not downgrade, but casablanca won't make it

3) Lower Priority:

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

 Owner

Service


servicecomposite Design/run time model : Service IM review according to the agreed Service Composite pattern. (Composite Pattern UML diagram) SDC (L)

Ext API (=SDC)

SO

 VoLTE

CCVPN

 CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon

 CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  High

Verizon-High

 Service Scaling A run time service instance could be updated by scaling in/out its capacity via deleting/adding new resources instances, e.g. sites in CCVPN usecase. SDC

SO

AAI

VoLTE

CCVPN

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon


 CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  Medium

Verizon-Medium

Service Instance

Run time model: service instance model

in relation to the design time model and Service Composite pattern. (Composite Pattern UML diagram)

A&AI

Ext API

SO

SDC

(All)

VoLTE

CCVPN

vCPE

 CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon

Orange


CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T: High

Verizon-High

Resource

 

ResourceComposite

Design time model: Resource composite model introduction according to the agreed Service Composite pattern. It includes the NS model review from Service component to Resource Composite and change of Modeling Domain (Composite Pattern UML diagram)

The ResourceComposite includes below sub-requirements:

  • support composite pattern (i.e., ResourceAtomic and ResourceComposite) in the IM and DM

SDC(->)

VNFSDK

VoLTE

CCVPN


CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

AT&T

Verizon

Intel

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE
Intel


CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  High

Verizon-High


 Network Service

(modeling subcommitee  DM approve firstly)

Context:
  1. In R2 VoLTE case, SDC support VoLTE service composed of IMS/EPC service as VNF. IMS/EPC Service can be composed of VNF, and VLD resources.
    In service layer, VOLTE service should focus on the IMS/EPC/... service composition, not coupled with the specific IMS/EPC/... resource composition. In the different scenes, IMS service can be implemented in different resources layer, for example, small capacity or large capacity, VNF in one DC or VNF on multiDC, even all PNFs or PNFs/VNFs, etc The multiple resource composition should not affected the service design. So network service is introduced, which is in charge of different IMS resource composition and let the service design not coupled with the resource composition design in detail.
  2. TMF support service and resource, and also in resource layer, there is resource composite. and Network service from ETSI can be mapping to the resource composite
  3. model subcommittee progress:

Network service is agreed in resource IM group. Networkservice IM Network service Descriptor has been discussed in DM group. Networkservice DM

4. SDC progress

org.openecomp.resource.vfc.NSD has been imported in ONAP catalog in R2 https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=sdc.git;a=tree;f=catalog-be/src/main/resources/import/tosca/nfv-types/NSD;h=bf5cabb52dc41025f4708c7c095e304196e7e6a6;hb=refs/heads/master

SDC functionality does not support NSD yet in R2

SDC requiremnets in R3:

1. SDC design UI, catalog(FE,BE,Database, API) shall support NS and related package based on R2 link

2. In resource design, NS descriptor shall be composed of VNFD, and VLD at least to support VoLTE based on R2 resources

3. In service design, service descriptor could be composed of the NSD.

4. NS descriptor shall refinement to support R3 NS DM Proposal( Stretch goal)

SDCVoLTE

CCVPN

5G

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

AT&T

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  Medium

guochuyi
 VNF instance (run time) Run time model of a VNF instance

(low)

 A&AI VoLTE

CCVPN

5G

vCPE

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

AT&T

Verizon
Intel

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  High

Verizon-High

 Kevin Scaggs (AT&T)
PNF instance (run time)Run time model of a PNF Instance.SDNC

A&AI

SO

VoLTE

CCVPN

5G

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

Vodafone

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

CMCC: Medium

Vodafone: Medium

victor gao
 WAN Connection Wan Connection Information Model


SDC(->)

SO

A&AI

SDNC

VoLTE

CCVPN

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

AT&T

Verizon

CMCC

Huawei

ZTE

CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  Medium

Verizon-Medium

Zhuoyao Huang
SD-WANCCVPN SD-WAN Information Model

CMCC

Huawei

AT&T

Verizon


CMCC: High

Vodafone: High

AT&T:  Medium

Verizon-High

Chuanyu Chen
ElementGroup enhancement

(lower)

Tied to modeling of Scaling, Homing, Placement, etc.SDC

SO


 AT&T
 AT&T:  MediumAndy Mayer (AT&T)

Infrastructure

Multi-cloud

The cloud abstractions needed for homing in the edge cloud across public cloud and service-provider-owned-cloudMulticloud

Edge automation

AT&T


AT&T:  Medium

Telemetry









4) Experimental:

Modeling Domain

Modeling Requirement

Modeling Requirement Description

Impacted

Projects

Use Case

Relevance

Modeling Spec

Commitment

Code

Commitment

Provider

Priority

 Owner

Resource

Container

Resource modeling changes in the IM, design time DM and runtime DMMulti-Cloud


Intel

Intel


Acceleration Management (BoF)

Discussing the requirement for acceleration management in ONAP, including research motivation,problem statement, as well as proposals. Welcome to join this thread.

( Acceleration Management (BoF) )






Lei Huang (Unlicensed)












  • No labels