Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 15 Next »

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameCasablanca
Project Lifecycle StateIncubation
Participating Company AT&T, China Mobile,  Amdocs, Ericsson.

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

The Casablanca release of VNFRQTS project will address the following items:

  • bug fixes, maintenance and feature alignment of VNF Guidelines, VNF Requirements and VNF Test Descriptions consistent with the rest of the ONAP Casablanca release.
    • including updates to HEAT  and TOSCA requirements for VNF Package onboarding
    • PNF capabilities supported by the ONAP platform 
    • 5G use cases supported by the ONAP platform
    • Autoscaling use case supported by the Platform
    • management interface updates
  • The VNF Provider Use case for Autoscaling to be documented with associated VNF Requirements
  • The VNF Test Descriptions appendix to be updated to reflect test implementations planned for Casablanca by other projects ( VVP, VNFSDK, etc.)
  • Toolchain improvements for the management of VNF Requirements
  • Categorization of VNF Requirements to support VNF Badging & certification initiatives

Use Cases

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer use case).

The TSC identified the following Use cases for Release A:

Release first proposed

TSC Use Case

VNFs identified/impacted  in TSC Use case

AmsterdamUse Case: Residential Broadband vCPE (Approved)

vBNG, vG_MUX, vG,  vAAA, vDHCP, vDNS

AmsterdamUse Case: vFW/vDNS (Approved)

vFW, vPacketGenerator, vDataSink, vDNS, vLoadBalancer,

all VPP based.

AmsterdamUse Case: VoLTE(approved)

vSBC, vPCSCF, vSPGW, vPCRF, VI/SCSCF, vTAS, VHSS, vMME

Beijing5G- RAN deployment, Slicing, SON
BeijingEnterprise vCPE --potential R1 use cases’ extensionvCPE, vAAA, vDHCP
BeijingONAP Change Management
BeijingSD-WANvBG
BeijingScale OutVOLTE, vDNS
BeijingCentralised Parser Distribution
 Casablanca

 5G Use case Items

Casablanca Requirements to Support 5G Use Case

 

•Complete PNF Support

PNF onboarding & Packaging

PNF Registration, VES Event domain

 Casablanca CCVPN(Cross Domain and Cross Layer VPN) USE CASE 
  • Service onboarding
  • Service configuration
 CasablancaCentralized Representation and Consistent Identification of Cloud Regions In ONAP


 Casablanca Change Management Extensions 

   Traffic migration building block

5G RAN PNF Software upgrade

Casablanca  Edge Automation through ONAP Access Management will leverage the PNF management
Casablanca  OpenSource Access Manager Access Management will leverage the PNF management
 Casablanca Scaling Use Case Extension In Beijing the operator had to manually select the controller type (SDNC or APPC) within VID.  The controller type should be part of the VNF model and not a run time option.
  Casablanca HPA Casablanca Plans (ONAP).pdf 
  • Specification of VNF HPA requirements as part of the VNFD (TOSCA only)
  • On-boarding and use of VNFs with TOSCA based VNFDs


The VNF Requirements developed by this project are applicable to the VNFs identified in the TSC E2E use cases.  

  • a  VNF Provider (developer) using VNF Requirements in designing, testing, and certifying a VNF for use on ONAP
  • Service Provider using VNF Requirements as prototype text for RFPs to acquire VNFs to run in an ONAP context see VNFRQTS-16
  • VNF Validation Project uses VNF Test Descriptions developed by this project to implement VNF testing for validation purposes. 
  • VNF SDK Project also uses VNF TEst Descriptions developed by this project to implement VNF testing for validation purposes

The VNF Requirements also cover nonfunctional requirements. ONAP non-functional requirements proposed for the Casablanca release that impact the VNF requirements include:

  • Security
    • Description of how the xNFs receive their certificates 


Minimum Viable Product

Describe the MVP for this release.

  • A VNF Guidelines document summarizing VNF provider oriented deliverables and providing informative, forward lookiging guidance. 
  • A set of Integrated VNF Requirements for use as prototype RFP text.
  • VNF Test Descriptions for use by VNF Validation project, and VNF SDK Project traceable from the VNF Requirments.
    • Appendix identifying which VNF requirements are testable by inspection of the VNF Package, and where the tests are implemented. 
  • VNF Use Case - VNF Provider Guidelines for VNF Scale Out Use Case
    • Manual Scale out
    • Automated Scale Out
  • VNF Badging Categories
    • Groomed list of VNF Requirements for VNF Badging
    • Groomed list of VNF Requirements for VNF Certification by testing

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh


Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

Amsterdam- deliver overview VNF Guidelines  & prototype RFP text requirements.

Beijing - Update Amsterdam deliverable for new ONAP features, Test Descriptions for VNF Package Testing, VNF Scaling Use case, tooling improvements

Casablanca - Extend tracability of VNF requirements into testing (VNF Requirements Database),additional VNF provider use cases, Update Bejing deliverable for new ONAP features

Dublin - Design time VNF testing description, additional VNF provider use cases, Update Casablanca deliverable for new ONAP features

El Alto - Run time VNF testing description, update Dublin deliverable for new ONAP features

Frankfurt - Update El Alto deliverable for new ONAP features

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
VNF Guidelines

Documentation. Provides a high level informative overview of guidance towards VNF providers.

(provided since Amsterdam release)

VNF Requirements

Documentation. Provides individually numbered requirements for VNFs

(provided since Amsterdam release)

VNF Use Cases

Documentation. Provides guidelines for VNF providers on use cases on interest to VNF providers

(new deliverable in Beijing release)

VNF Test Case

Documentation. Provides test case descriptions for how to test VNFs.

(new deliverable in Beijing release)

VNF EPICsdocumentation ( future)

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

DeliverablerepoFiles Structure of repo
VNF Guidelines:vnfrqts/guidelinesFile per chapter
VNF Requirements:vnfrqts/requirementsFile per chapter
VNF Use Cases:vnfrqts/usecasesFile per Use Case
VNF Test Descriptions:vnfrqts/testcasesFile Per Test Case Dscription
VNF EPICs:vnfrqts/epicsnot used in Casablanca Release

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.


Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
PerformanceNA
documentation
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
StabilityNA
documentation
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
ResiliencyNA
documentation
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
SecurityNA
documentation
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
ScalabilityNA
documentation
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
ManageabilityNA
documentation
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability1

1

Establish Linkage to VNF Testing (improved testability)

Establish categorization and linkage to VNF Badging ( improved Usability)

Toolchain improvements (improved consistency) 

docs.onap.org

VNF Guidelines

VNF Requirements

VNF Use Cases

VNF Test Case Descriptions

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation


  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

Other ONAP projects that this VNF Requirements project depends on:

The VNF Requirments does not produce code interfaciong with platform APIs. The VNF Requirments do consoliate requirements from ONAP platform compontents that impact the design and development of VNFs.  These ONAP platform components in the table below generate APIs that impact VNFs and so these are generally reflected in the VNF Requirements. 

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
APPC   VNF configuration  requirementsM2M3APPC Documentation
Authentication and authorization Framework VNF Security RequirementsM2M3
DCAE VNF reporting requirementsM2M3DCAE APIs documentation
Modeling  Tosca Data Modeling for VNFN/A
ONAP Modelling Specifications
Multi-VIM/ MultiCloudnetwork cloud infrastructure requirementsN/A
MultiCloud Documentation
SDN-C  API requirements on VNFsM2M3SDNC APIs documentation
Service Design & Creation    VNF onboardingM2M3SDC documentation
VF-C  VNF life cycle management and configurationM2M3VF-C APIs documentation
  • API Outgoing Dependencies

The VNF Requirements do not provide code with APIs, but the VNF Requirements are used as inputs  by a number of other ONAP projects.API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
Documentation  

References   to deliverables produced by this project may be included in various ONAP release documents maintained through the  documentation project

N/A see the  VNFRQTS <> Documentation Project Workflows wiki page

Continuous Delivery

( build via Docs Jenkins Job)

docs.onap.org

Reference  VNFs (now Integration  Project)

Reference  VNFs should be VNF Requirement compliant. The Integration Project  maintaining those Reference VNFS would be dependent on the VNF Requirements for validating compliance.

N/A see the VNFRQTS <> Integration Project Workflow wiki page



Beijing release version published, Casablanca version in process

consolidated list of VNF Requirements published in Appendix 8d of docs.onap.org

VNF SDK VNF  tooling should support the development and packaging of VNFs that are  conformant to the VNF Requirements 


NA see the VNFRQTS<> VNFSDK project Workflow wiki page

Beijing release version published, Casablanca version in processVNF Test Description lists testable requirements. Appendix captures which are tested by VNFSDK
VNF Validation program (ICE)  VNF  Validation  should be traceable  against the VNF Requirements

N/A see the VNFRQTS <> VNF Validation project Workflow wiki page.


Beijing release version published, Casablanca version in process

VNF Test Description lists testable requirements. Appendix captures which are tested by VVP

  • Third Party Products Dependencies


The VNF Requirements is documentation rather than code so there is no dependency on 3rd party products other than the documentation and development tool chains provided through the Linux Foundation. 


  • Testing and Integration Plans

The VNF Requirements is documentation built using the LF toolchain from .rst files into html. This tooclhain is administered by the documentation project. The toolchain provides for syntax checks of the documentation within Sphinx, doc8 etc.

The VNF Requirements is documentation rather than code so there is no code delivery for CSIT.

Reference VNFs used  for integration should be documenting their compliance to VNF Requirements.

  • Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
VNF Requirements linkage to testing

VNF Requirements are current provided for RFP purposes, but the linkage to testing and validation of those requirments is not yet in place

This release provides initial generic test plan descriptions for testing of VNFs based on the VNF Package. It does not provide test descriptions for design time or run time functional testing of VNFs.

The testing linkage is also costrained by the scope of the VNF Information model in the VNF Package and the relationships identified between that information model and the VNF requirements.

VNF Badging and certification programs are not yet in place, but enabling organizational arrangements e.g. LFN C&V committee are making these more viable.

Hardware / infrastructure requirementsThe Beijing release requirements had a placeholder (Chapter 6) for VNF requirements associated with the hardware execution environment. Additional requirements are expected in this area from the Multi-VIM project, and perhaps the PNF related features.
HEAT/TOSCA requirementsThe Beijing release requirements has text on HEAT and TOSCA requirements but not all were numbered requirements text. This is expected to be improved as part of the Casablanca release work.
  • Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
ONAP supporting multiple onboarding formatswork with VNF SDK, VVP and SDC to minimize the risk.Document the desired direction in the forward looking VNF Guidelines
Inconsistency between published  VNF Requirements and ONAP Platform
  • Project reporting at M2 milestone 
  • Raise bug reports


document discrepancy in release notes
  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

MilestoneDeliverableDate
M0Intent to ParticipateJune 14, 2018
 M1

Release Plan

M1 Checklist

 June 28, 2018
 M2M2 ChecklistJuly 26, 2018 
 M3 M3 Checklist August 23, 2018
 M4 M4Checklist September 20, 2018
 RC0 RC0 Checklist October 11, 2018
 RC1 RC1Checklist October 25, 2018
 RC2 RC2 Checklist November 8, 2018
 Signoff Signoff Checklist November 15, 2018
  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
M1

VNFRQTS-236 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Tool Chain
 M4

  VNFRQTS-239 - Getting issue details... STATUS

 Bug Fix
 M2

  VNFRQTS-240 - Getting issue details... STATUS

 Use Cases
 M3

  VNFRQTS-241 - Getting issue details... STATUS

 Test
 M4

  VNFRQTS-242 - Getting issue details... STATUS

 badging


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.



  • No labels