Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 7
Next »
Agenda:
- Update / Progress
- TOSCA based orchestration demo
- Arthur Berezin presented concepts
- Cloudify provides a consistent TOSCA model for app deployment
- How does it integrate with Openshift or rancher? Answer: the operator will be allowed to chose options. Provides the flexibility of deployment.
- Team agreed that the deployment mechanism must be a choice for the operator - nothing forced by the OOM platform.
- Q: It seems you are wrapping a 50 lines file in a 500 lines file. Why? A: To provide consistent app descriptors across deployment mechanisms (openstack, bare metal, K8S, etc).
- Need to understand between K8S and Cloudify. Are we preventing K8S to perform its job by adding Cloudify on top? A: Cloudify is decoupled from K8S. We are delegating a portion of the orchestration to K8S. Cloudify is adding value on top of K8S, and letting K8S do what it does best: container orchestration.
- Goal of Cloudify is really to use a TOSCA based approach to deploying applications.
- John Ng presented the AT&T progress on Cloudify
- AT&T needs to bring the code upstream earlier
- M2 functionality freeze
- Next objectives
- Team agreed that making 1.1 working in Kubernetes is the top priority
- Fix the ZOOM meeting for next meeting.
- Arthur Berezin will share blueprint as seed code.
- Need to allow people to push code that is not working
- Team agreed that we should use an Upstream first approach to OOM (got a few +1's on the call on this one). Same concept should be applied to ONAP wide. David S to bring issue to TSC tomorrow.
- John Ng will reach out to internal AT&T team members to see how soon the code can be uptreamed. The idea is to make sure we create a community around OOM. We need to avoid 100k commits.