Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

BRIDGE: https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/94501391330?password=c2f4cfa9-d9f5-4156-9ab2-c141fcdf671f

Passcode: 209247

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)HolidayDid Not Attend

Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat 

DT
China Mobile
Ericsson
Individual
AT&T
Incognito
Huawei
Windriver
China Telecom



Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/



Strategy (45 minutes)

ONAP takeaways


We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements.

LFN Cross-Organization Updates

MAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board



TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates



Task Force Updates






O-Parent Removal

Adheli (Ericsson)

Ericsson Policy Framework team is sharing O-Parent dependency removal experience

Operations (40 minutes)


TSC Activities and Deadlines

Byung-Woo Jun 

ONAP component mature state, Mature State Projects

Now, we are handling ONAP component individually under ONAP Streamlining, exposing the components to users. CPS is the first case that TSC approved the mature state after ONAP Streamlining. Should we keep the projects under the list as "mature", or should we certify them again? Several components are deprecated.

Gold badging is a separate process from the project maturity in LFN?

  • CPS got the gold badging
  • What other components do we want to get the gold badging? Policy is working on it.

Release Status

Oslo release has started, Release Planning: Oslo. (Kick off : May 30)

RelEng/Infrastructure

https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-25573

    • Kevin Sandi - a workaround solution will be tried;
    • Marek / Matthew - automatic building solution is needed; escalate this?
    • Kevin/Matt/Kevin - create a ticket and try a solution (maybe Github action helps? PoC??)
    • Some action plans and updates next week
  • Thomas Kulik - issues with Portal-NG and other documentation - IT-26899 Project is not created in RTD
  • LF IT migrating CI pipeline to GitHub actions - may take to the end of fall or later, once ONAP is completed for GitHub Actions , we will do security review. Last update from Matt is that LF IT is continuously shipping one project at a time. 
    • What is the current progress?

PTL Updates


  • Recommended packages upgrades are available on the restricted Wiki. Jiras are created per project. 

    Need to check NG Portal status CLM jobs. Any update? Jessica Gonzalez , ongoing.

    • Sonatype officially does not provide an equivalent plugin, but there is the Sonatype Scan Gradle Plugin that could provide similar functionality

Ticket opened by Fiete: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26527

https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26882

https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26881

    • ongoing; Jessica and Fiete are discussing this.

Subcommittee Updates

Arch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements


  • ARCCOM Requirements and Architecture reviews are started for Oslo. 
    • PTLs / Feature owners contact ARCCOM for reviews
  • ARCCOM plan for Oslo (lightweight ONAP with AI/ML) - Work in progress
  • Preparing for Oslo documentation plan - easy to use, user guide for Lightweight ONAP, trouble-shooting...  taking input from Keguang He, Dong Wang, Muddasar Ahmed...

Events & Meetings

(5 minutes)

Upcoming Events & Housekeeping



Zoom Chat Log 



Zoom auto-transcript service - These are often translated incorrectly and can be misleading. They are NOT Authoritative!   Information as to why .
They are included here as a time stamp cross-reference for the recording only!  The notes above this line and the actual recordings are authoritative. 


  • No labels