Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

...

  • Reach CII passing badge, increasing test coverage as remaining item
  • AAF CADI integration
  • Infrastructure setup for js test coverage
AreaActual levelTargeted level for current releaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance0

0

(given CLAMP is design time there is no point to adhere to L2 requirement) 

Run performance basic test, depends on performance criteria availability for level 1 - not able to commit to more than what was done on Beijing
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – Level 0: no performance testing done
  • Level 1: baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability11
  • measured  (such as response time, transaction/message rate, latency, footprint, etc. to be defined on per component)
  • Level 2: performance improvement plan created 
  • Level 3: performance improvement plan implemented for 1 release (improvement measured for equivalent functionality & equivalent hardware)

minimum level for Dublin is 0 except for Control Loop projects. 


see Performance levels

Stability12

Participate to Stability runs Level 1

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jiracolumnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
keyCLAMP-100

  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate

    276


    Integration Team is responsible to run the platform test to prove level 2.

    • Level 0: none beyond release requirements
    • Level 1: 72 hour component-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
    • Level 2: 72 hour platform-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
    • Level 3: track record over 6 months of reduced defect rate

    minimum level for Dublin:2 

    see Stability levels

    Resiliency1

    1

    (given CLAMP is design time there is no point to adhere to L2 requirement) 

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
    keyCLAMP-83

    Manageability
    • Level 0 – none: no redundancy
    • Level 1 : support manual failure and recovery (< detection & rerouting or recovery within a single site; tested to complete in 30 minutes)
    • Level 2 : support automated detection and recovery (single site)
    • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
    Security11
    • 0 – none
    • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage, including no critical and high known vulnerabilities>60 days old
    • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal/external communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls based on CADI
    • 3 – CII Gold
    Scalability11

    Level 1 single site horizontal scaling

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
    keyCLAMP-102

    • 0 – no ability to scale
    • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
    • 2 – geographic scaling
    • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
    • failure detection & rerouting 
      • within a single geographic site
      • stateless components: establish baseline measure of failed requests for a component failure within a site 
      • stateful components: establish baseline of data loss for a component failure within a site
    • Level 3: support automated failover detection & rerouting 

      • across multiple sites 

      • stateless components 

        • improve on # of failed requests for component failure within a site 

        • establish baseline for failed requests for site failure 

      • stateful components 

        • improve on data loss metrics for component failure within a site 

        • establish baseline for data loss for site failure


    Minimum Levels (Dublin)

    • Runtime Projects: Level 2 (stretch goal Level 3)
      • NOTE: For Dublin, the building blocks will be put in place for Level 3 geo-redundancy, and a few projects will pilot it
    • All other Projects: Level 1 (stretch goal Level 2)

    see Resiliency Levels 

     

    Security11

    same as in Casablanca, not enough resource to allocate to this effort.



    see Security Levels

    Scalability11

    Level 1 single site horizontal scaling

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
    keyCLAMP-102

    • Level 0: no ability to scale
    • Level 1: supports single site horizontal scale out and scale in, independent of other components
    • Level 2: supports geographic scaling, independent of other components
    • Level 3: support scaling (interoperability) across multiple ONAP instances

    Minimum Levels (Dublin)

    • Runtime Projects: Level 1 
      • NOTE: For Dublin, the building blocks will be put in place for Level 2 geographic scaling, and a few projects will pilot it
    • All other Projects: Level 0 

    see Scalability levels 

    Manageability1

    1

    (2, if CLAMP can get more resource from the community)


    • Level 1:
      • All ONAP components will use a single logging system.
      • Instantiation of a simple ONAP system should be accomplished in <1 hour with a minimal footprint
    • Level 2:
      • A component can be independently upgraded without impacting operation interacting components
      • Component configuration to be externalized in a common fashion across ONAP projects
      • All application logging to adhere to ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2
      • Implement guidelines for a minimal container footprint
    • Level 3
      • Transaction tracing across components

    Minimum Levels (Dublin)

    • All Projects: Level 2
      • New projects should adhere to v1.2
      • Existing projects have stretch goal for v1.2
    • Stretch Goal: Level 3 
    • Note: some work will be done in Dublin to test/prep for a release upgrade strategy

    see Manageability Levels 

    Usability1

    1

    (2,  if if CLAMP can get more resource from the community)

    • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
    • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
      ; All application logging to adhere to
      ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2

    • 3 - Transaction tracing across components

    Usability1

    1

    (2, if CLAMP can get more resource from the community)

    CLAMP is not anticipating new API at this point, so we are technically compliant with API CVS at this point

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – API documentation; usability testing; tutorial documentation;All new API’s

    CLAMP is not anticipating new API at this point, so we are technically compliant with API CVS at this point

    • Level 1:

        • User guide created
        • Deployment documentation
        • API documentation
        • Adherence to coding guidelines
    • Level 2:
    • Level 3
        • Consistent UI across ONAP projects
        • Usability testing conducted
        • API Documentation
    • Level 4
      and
          •  and Documentation Guidelines
      ; All existing APIs must be documented in Swagger 2.0
    • 3 - UI consistency; usability testing; API Documentation

      (changed and external APIs follow policy)

    • 4 - API Documentation (all follow policy)

       

      Minimum Levels (Dublin)

      • All Projects: Level 2
      • Stretch Goal: External APIs also follow the Versioning Strategy


    • see Usability Levels


    API Incoming Dependencies

    List the API this release is expecting from other ONAP component(s) releases.
    Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

    Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

    ...

    Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
    new policy api(and contents) for CRUD operations on policies not defined yet use old policy API

    create config. policy the old("R3 release") way

    blueprint generated by DCAE-D (SDC) might not be compatible with DCAEkeep current manual blueprint onboarding in SDC (as VFI).manually created blueprint with correct format manually on boarded in SDC and distributed to CLAMP and DCAE. 
    new DCAE API to get status of µS not yet defined    use current DCAE api monitor only µS created by CLAMP

    Resources

    Link toward the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

    Release Milestone

    ...

    Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS

    Charter Compliance

    The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

    Release Key Facts

    Fill out and provide a link toward the centralized Release Artifacts.