Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Meeting Minutes

Membership

Alla Goldner alla.goldner@amdocs.com

Anatoly Andrianov anatoly.andrianov@nokia.com

Andrei Kojukhov andreik@amdocs.com

Avi Chapnick avich@amdocs.com

Brian Freeman bf1936@att.com

Chengli Wang wangchengli@chinamobile.com

Damon Li damonl@vmware.com

Eric Debeau eric.debeau@orange.com

Ethan Lynn ethanlynnl@vmware.com

Yuangxing Feng feng.yuanxing@zte.com.cn

George Lapiotis george.lapiotis@ericsson.com

Gil BULLARD wb5674@att.com

Helen Chen helen.chen@huawei.com

Hui Deng denghui12@huawei.com

Jianguo Zeng zengjianguo@huawei.com

Jimmy Forsyth James Forsyth

Jinhua Fu fu.jinhua@zte.com.cn

Joe Zhang zhang.zhou1@zte.com.cn

Jon Taylor jon.taylor@amdocs.com

John Zannos jaazannos@gmail.com

Kang Xi kang.xi@huawei.com

Lingli Deng denglingli@chinamobile.com

Liron Shtraichman lironsh@amdocs.com

Li zi li.zi30@zte.com.cn

Lv Bo lv.bo163@zte.com.cn

Maopeng Zhang zhang.maopeng1@zte.com.cn

Mark Pond mpond@amdocs.com 

Mazin Gilbert mazin@research.att.com

Nagesha Subramanya nagesha.subramanya@nokia.com

Nir Rapaport Nir.Rapaport@amdocs.com

Oleg Kaplan oleg.kaplan@amdocs.com

Oliver Spatscheck spatsch@research.att.com

Sumit Verdi sverdi@vmware.com

Timo Perala timo.perala@nokia.com

Tomer Oster tomer.oster@amdocs.com

Vimal Begwani Begwani@att.com

Vivien Yang vivien.yang@intel.com

Xinhui Li lxinhui@vmware.com

Yoav Kluger yoav.kluger@amdocs.com

Yang Xu yang.xu3@huawei.com

Yan Yang  yangyanyj@chinamobile.com

Yunlong Ying ying.yunlong@zte.com.cn

Yosi Ben-Tsur yosi.bentsur@amdocs.com

Zhaoxing Meng meng.zhaoxing1@zte.com.cn

Wenyao Guan guanwenyao@chinamobile.com

Yuan Liu liuyuanyjy@chinamobile.com

Tao Shen shentao@chinamobile.com

Victor Gao victor.gao@huawei.com

Xin Jin saw.jin@huawei.com

Seshu Kumar seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com

Guirong Wang wangguirong@boco.com.cn

Xiaodong Ning ningxiaodong2017@boco.com.cn

Hu Dong donghu@raisecom.com

Yannan Han hanyanan@raisecom.com

jamil chawki jamil.chawki@orange.com

Michal Pawlowski michal.pawlowski1@orange.com

Jacopo Pianigiani jpianigiani@juniper.net

Luman Wang  wanglm.bri@chinatelecom.cn

Sujing Zhang    zhang.sujing@zte.com.cn

Catherine Lefevre cl664y@att.com

Christophe Closset ChrisC

Gervais-Martial Ngueko Gervais-Martial Ngueko

Pamela Dragosh Pamela Dragosh

Randa Maher rx196w@att.com

Dan Timoney dtimoney@att.com

Amir Levy amir@gigaspaces.com

DeWayne Filppi DeWayne@gigaspaces.com

Arthur Berezin arthur@gigaspaces.com

Nati Shalom natis@gigaspaces.com

Heliu Zhong zhognheliu@boco.com.cn

Yuanwei Yang yangyuanwei@boco.com.cn

Jingbo Liu liujingbo@boco.com.cn

zhangxiong Zhou zhouzhangxiong@boco.com.cn

Michael O'Brien frank.obrien@amdocs.com

Meeting logistics:

Kickoff meeting: Monday, June 19, 1500 UTC

Meeting Information:

Every other Monday - 7:00am PDT, 10:00am EDT, 10:00pm China Time

IRC: 

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/655429955

Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +16465588656,655429955# or +14086380968,655429955#

Or Telephone:
Dial: +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll) or +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll)
Meeting ID: 655 429 955
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=CqsAwHx4CSyRanCfPHKBvf6Vslgcsn86

Use case subcommittee mailing list

 onap-usecasesub@lists.onap.org 

Participating in UC meetings

  • Use case subcommittee is contribution-driven

    • People can sign up for slots on the agenda

    • We will request people to develop proposals/presentations to discuss during meetings and via email

TSC subcommittee purpose:

Requirements Subcommittee Members

The use case subcommittee is responsible for developing use cases required for ONAP releases. This includes basic flows, VNFs and requirements, including alignment with use cases focused on VNF Requirements, along with a set of required guidelines for ONAP. It will be used as an input for developing functional architecture and detailed software architecture per release.

...

The use case subcommittee will not make decisions regarding Release’s functional architecture or internal functioning of projects. It is a support group for the TSC Chair and the TSC

...

. The use case subcommittee is advisory by nature, and not authoritative. It may provide advice to projects and to the TSC and TSC’s Architecture subcommittee.

...

The use case subcommittee operates on a rough consensus basis.  If the subcommittee is unable to reach consensus on what use case to offer, the subcommittee will refer the matter to the TSC.

...


Participation

The use case subcommittee is open to all interested participants, and all meetings are open. Use case subcommittee is contribution-driven.

  • People can sign up for slots on the agenda
  • We will request people to develop proposals/presentations to discuss during meetings and via email

Deliverables

The use case subcommittee will develop and maintain use case descriptions and any related explanatory material for ONAP releases.

Midway through a release, the use case subcommittee will provide its proposal for the use cases to be supported for the next release.

TSC subcommittee starting participants:

The use case subcommittee is open to all interested participants, and meetings are open.

Use case subcommittee flow:

1.            Use case subcommittee discuses new use cases

2.            Use case subcommittee produces use case flow diagrams, provides its view on the foreseen modules introductions/modifications and suggests potential PNFs / VNFs

3.            Use case subcommittee gets feedback from the potentially effected projects including integration team on feasibility

4.            Iterate back to 2

5.            TSC approves the use case

6.            In case a new modules or a new functionality to existing modules or a new APIs introduction is foreseen, architecture subcommittee defines the new/modified ONAP flows and the interfaces principles, based on the approved use cases

7.            Projects define their extended functionality and their external APIs, following those principles.

8.            Detailed per-component flows are defined by the projects and projects write their user stories / implement them; Integration team continuously works with Use case subcommittee to accompany the use case development, review epics/user stories, answer questions, etc. Use case subcommittee behaves as system engineers for the use case through test start date

9.            Integration team defines the gating use case based on step 8 and finalizes the PNFs / VNFs selection, with the help of use case subcommittee, architecture subcommittee, PTLs of a different ONAP projects

10.          TSC approves the gating use case

...

Definition

Functional requirement - ONAP platform functional enrichment, enabling to build a different e2e use cases.

e2e use case - a new e2e functionality enriching ONAP platform, comprising of a different functional requirements. It can be tested e2e.

Process


Meeting logistics

Mailing List

 onap-usecasesub@lists.onap.org 

Meeting Information

Every Monday - 7:00am PDT, 10:00am EDT, 10:00pm China Time

Topics for discussion:

  1. M[x]-GATES, Score Cards, PJM, Status on Milestones
  2. Architecture , Requirements – TSC Bridging
  3. Steering Key Topics for discussion & investigation
  4. Testing – Evolution – Integration/Regression Dev-Test
  5. PTL cameos
  6. Release Content & Next Release Content
  7. Conferences Preparation, Reports, Review & Discussion
  8. Use Case Reports & Status
  9. Cross-U/C Interactions Steering topics

This would be done under assumption that different use cases/functional requirements tracks for covering their detailed work continue.

 While:

  1. M-GATES – Discussion about the M1-2-3-4 gates. Where we are on Score Cards, PJM type discussion and topics, Status on Milestones. Bringing people together related to Use Case and where we are on the Use Cases.
  2. BRIDGING – tie together Architecture , Requirements, and TSC calls. Identifying those key things that come from those other calls back to what is relevant for Use Cases.
  3. STEERING –Steering Key Topics for discussion & investigation. Identifying what we need to be investigating.
  4. TESTING - Testing and Integration/Regression Dev-Test are key topics that span U/Cs. Tying in integration status, and discussion about where testing and integration needs to evolve. For example a discussion of regression testing and how that will be done, or what developments in automation of integration team means to the U/Cs.
  5. PTL CAMEOS – have a “schedule” of PTLs to make cameo appearances at the U/C (Monday) call and then reach out to the U/C owners to ask what they need to discuss w/ the PTLs and reserve 30min (or the whole meeting) to meet with that PTL discussion U/C topics.
  6. RELEASE CONTENT – the Release and Next Release Content, USE CASES/FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS WISE. What potential new U/Cs are we thinking about for R5 El Alto for example.
  7. CONFERENCES – Discussion about Preparation and review of topics and presentations and logistics. Then after the conference discussion of Reports, Readouts, Review, and Retrospectives.
  8. U/C STATUS – Use Case Reports & Status
  9. Cross U/C INTERACTIONS and INTERDEPENDENCIES – share the Cross-U/C Interactions finding, and create Steering topics for further investigation by the U/C teams or U/C realization calls.

Use Case Subcommittee Meeting Minutes

IRC

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/655429955

Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +16465588656,655429955# or +14086380968,655429955#

Or Telephone:
Dial: +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll) or +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll)
Meeting ID: 655 429 955

International Numbers

 https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=CqsAwHx4CSyRanCfPHKBvf6Vslgcsn86