Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Info
titleLegend

Color code:

  • Red: below maturity level
  • Yellow: same maturity.
  • Green: improved maturity level.

M1 Actual represents the assessment before M1. M1 Target represents, at M1 date, what the team plans to implement. M4 result represents what has been really implemented at M4 date . All these fields are self-assessed by the team.



AREA

Design / Run-Time

Performance

(min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others)

Stability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Resiliency

(min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others)

Security

(min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver)

Scalability

(min: level 1 for runtime projects)

Manageability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Usability

(min: level 2 all projects)

Min TSC Recommendations
M1 Actual

M1 Target

M4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 result
Project Name





















A&AIR111111222111+ (75% toward silver)111

1

(see note #10)

11111
Application Authorization FrameworkR111222222222222

1+ (see Note #11)

2 * (See Note # 26)21+2 * (See Note # 26)2
APPCR111111222222111111111
CLAMPD00011111111+1+111111111
Common Controller SDKR000NANANA2221+ (75% towards silver)1+ (75% towards silver)1+ (75% towards silver)NANANA222222
DCAED & R1112222221+ (76% Silver)1+ (76% Silver)1+ (76% Silver)11111+ (see Note#14)1+

1+

(see Note#13)

1+1+
DMaaPR111222222

1+

(see note #16)

1+1+1111+ (see note #17)1+1+111
External API FrameworkR22222222211+1+111111222
HolmesR22
12
1+2
1+1+ 
11
11
1+2
Logging Enhancements ProjectR2* (unable to test/verify)

2

0

(See note #24)



1




1

1 (see note #8)

1

POMBA (under but separate pod from Logging)R2* (unable to test/verify)

    2

     0

(See note #25)






   1

     1

      1

Microservices BusR222222222111222222222
ModelingD/R111111222111111111122
Multi VIM/CloudR111222222222111222222
MUSICR111111222111222111111
ONAP CLID & R111112222111.5 Note #28111112 Note #28222 Note #28
ONAP Optimization FrameworkR1111112221+ (75% towards silver)1+1+111111111
ONAP Usecase UI ProjectR111111222111111111111
Policy Framework Project ProposalD & R

D: 1

R: 2

D: 1

R: 2

D: 1

R: 2

2

22

D: 2

R: 2

D: 2

R: 2

D: 2

R: 2

2 (silver)2 (silver)

2 (silver)

1

11

2

22222
Portal Platform Project ProposalD & R12 (Note #27)21

2

(Note #27)

22221+

2

(Note #27)

21111

2

(Note #27)

22+2+2+
SDN-CR0001112221+ (75% towards silver)1+ (75% towards silver)1+ (75% towards silver)111222222
Service Design & CreationD000

2

(Note #2)

2

(Note #2)

2

(Note #2)

1

11

1

(Note #12)

1

(Note #12)

1

(Note #12)

1111

1

(Note #10)

1

(Note #10)

111
Service OrchestratorR11111122211

1

(89% towards Silver)

111111111
VFCR111111222111111111111
VIDR000

2

22222222111

1

(Note #8)

22222
VNF SDKD000111111

1+

(Note #18)

1+

1.5

111111

2

(Note #19)

22


Note 1: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team;

...

Note 13: Level2 - Swagger definition completed; new component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy and some existing component (VESCollector) updated

...

Note 23: OOF lost passing badge as recommended by sec team late into Dublin release, due to hard coded credentials in OOM (please see PTL 2019-05-13 more details.)

Note 24: the logging project reads logs from other components and displays to Kibana.

...