Flexible designer and orchestrator
Traffic migration
https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/submodules/integration.git/docs/docs_vFWDT.html
5G RAN PNF In-place software upgrade
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/docs/docs_5G_PNF_Software_Upgrade.rst?h=casablanca
5G - PNF Software Update
5G - PNF Software Update Test Status
Change schedule optimizer
https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/submodules/optf/cmso.git/docs/index.html
M4 is GREEN for all Change Management Functionalities.
For Casablanca release, we propose the following functionalities.
...
SDC | SO | SDNC | APPC | CCSDK [Ansible playbooks] | OOF | A&AI | Policy | DCAE | Test Case | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flexible designer/orchestrator | Amdocs | AT&T
Lead: Elena Kuleshov ( ) | vGW in-place software upgrade |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traffic management | AT&T
Lead: Ruchira Agarwal | Orange
Lead: Lukasz Rajewski | Orange, Intel
Lead: Lukasz Rajewski
Lead: Eric Multanen | vFW migrate traffic and vGW quiesce/resume traffic |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5G PNF in-place software upgrade | AT&T
Lead: Ruchira Agarwal | China Mobile, Huawei
Lead: Yaoguang Wang | 5G PNF in-place software upgrade (emulator)
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change schedule optimization | AT&T
Lead: Jerry Flood | trigger vGW in-place software upgrade at scheduled time |
|
...
1) Flexible workflow designer and orchestrator
Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Impacted components: SDC, SO, and VID (nice-to-have)
- Contributors: AT&T, Amdocs, Huawei (?)
- Functionalities
...
2) Traffic migration building block
Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Impacted components: SDNC, APPC
- Contributors: AT&T, Orange, Intel
- Functionalities
- Traffic to one or multiple (V)NFs is distributed by a Traffic Distribution/Balancing Entity
- For Casablanca, we will focus on the LCM action necessary for traffic migration. For Dublin and beyond, we will create a workflow within SO for traffic migration.MigrateTraffic traffic migration
- New LCM action to control traffic distribution (to achieve traffic migration) - will also have to update CDT Design tool
- DistributeTraffic LCM action (Alternative is ConfigModify LCM action is if PTLs recommend to push MigrateTraffic DistributeTraffic LCM to Dublin)
- Source, destination nodes - pool
- Flow distribution policy - equal distribution for e.g.
- Anchor points - e.g., DNS for layer-4+ VNFs
- Fine-grained flow filter
- Failure handler
- Anchor point ID (VNF ID in action identifier)
- Traffic distribution weights for all nodes covered by the anchor point that require changes - this will be in the payload section in the form of "ConfigFileName" The config file (json) would be stored in the Ansible docker.
- The playbook would read a Traffic Distribution Configuration file associated with the DistribConfigName value sent by the Controller
- If we want to test/try various traffic distributions (many tests), we could have many Traffic Distribution Configuration files, each with it own DistribConfigName.
The Playbook could also include a step to take a backup of the Traffic Distribution/Balancing Entity current traffic distrib/configuration and save it locally at some dir path. If the new traffic distribution action is rejected/failed then the playbook can restore previous traffic distribution/config. The Playbook can offer lots of flexibility and it is up to the entity SME to decide what he/she wants to do upon a DistributeTraffic action request.
- Mechanisms for traffic migration - implemented by controller
- Assessment report on commonalities/differences across VNF types – e.g., IP based redirection, DNS based or load balancer
- Integration/testing
- For Casablanca, we will demonstrate traffic migration across 2 vFWs using traffic source as the anchor point
- Ansible playbook for adjusting the traffic weight on the traffic source (anchor point)
- Traffic weight before migration: 100,0 and traffic weight after migration: to 0,100
- Second test case would be traffic migration (quiesece / resume) on vGW/vCPE
Execution flow:
Gliffy | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
User → DMAAP → SDNC/APPC → Ansible → VNF(s)
...
View file | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
View file | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
For the LCM action :
If the payload contains pnf-flag and it is set to true then that indicates request for PNF.
If it is set to false, then the request is for VNF, and we will use vnf-id in input and nf-naming-code in payload.
nf-naming-code = vgw for example.
SDNC will look up nf-naming-code in AAI if not passed in payload.
For PNF, we will use the following in payload: pnf-name and ipaddress-v4-oam
3) 5G RAN PNF Software upgradeupgrade
Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Impacted components: SDNC, Ansible (CCSDK)
- Contributors: AT&T, China Mobile, Huawei
- Functionalities
Leverage in-place software upgrade Beijing use case (minor changes) to demonstrate application to 5G RAN PNFs
Complete generic building blocks for flexible upgrade workflow design
Enhance precheck and postcheck steps with vendor specific rules
Integrate the external controller into ONAP controller, and the EC will handle temporary states retrieval/storage/analysis of PNFsExternal controller would receive instructions from Ansible SDNC
PNF ID, Expected Software Version, Controller Type, EC type, Rule Name and corresponding parameters can be specified at run time
Update A&AI entry with new PNF software version, as ‘active version’
Support Batch software upgrade operations (stretch goal)
- More details: 5G - PNF Software Update
4) Change Management Scheduler
Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Impacted components: OOF
- Contributors: AT&T
- Functionalities
- Discover schedule based on the change management constraints
- Constraints
- Time-based - e.g., execute the change activity during the maintenance window and weekdays
- Concurrency of how many NF instances to change at a time - this is concurrency within a single user request
- NF conflicts (if time permits) - avoid work scheduled at the same time on the same NF instance
- Input
- List of NF instances - request details as depicted in the Beijing script
- Start/end times
- Expected duration
- Constraint/policy
- Type of change (workflow name)
- Concurrency value
- Output
- Schedule - time and instance at which the workflow would be executed
Integration/Testing plan
Use Beijing vGW in-place software upgrade to demo execution based on the schedule output by OOF
...