...
This section describes Business Drivers needs. These business drivers are presented on the Requirements Sub-committee and should also be put into the release requirements sub-committee page.
Executive Summary - (Give a short description of your Use Case, the "Executive 2 min elevator pitch", this describes the "WHAT")
Business Impact - (This is the Business Impact which describes why this use case is important from a business perspective, this describes the "WHY").
Business Markets - (This is the marketing analysis, which can include but not limited to applicable markets, domains, marketing projections, this can describe the "WHERE").
Funding/Financial Impacts - (The Funding requirements and Financial impacts can describe the financial savings, or CAPEX, OPEX impacts for a Use Case)The CMPv2 work in R8 will develop (1) Integration with Cert-Manager (certificate enrollment solution recommended by OOM) and (2) DCAE further integration (expected to be completed by R7 bug fixes). This requirement improves ONAP Security with CMPv2. CMP is used by multiple operations including Plug and Play, and NetConf operation. In R6 CMPv2 Certificate Service and basic development was implemented. Integration with server & client to the certificate service was completed. There are also two ONAP bordering component that were integrated with the certificate service with interfaces to SDN-C and DCAE. See the REQ-431: https://jira.onap.org/browse/REQ-431?src=confmacro
Business Impact - The enhancement to CMPv2 operation will improve security management within ONAP and affects multiple ONAP functions and use cases, including Plug and Play (PNF registration) and NetConf. As with all security functionality within ONAP, Security is a fundamental aspect of FCAPS, being the "S" for security management.
Business Markets - This project applies to any domain (wireless, transport, optical, and wireline) that ONAP may manage.
Funding/Financial Impacts - Potential OPEX savings with enhanced security to prevent breaches and prevent security compromises.
Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies - (It is suggested that you use the following wording): There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this use case outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider. (This would typically describe the "WHO", but because use cases are all deployed with ONAP itself, these two areas come with the actual ONAP deployment and uses the organizational management and sales strategies of a particular service provider's ONAP deployment)
Development Status
PROJECT | PTL | User Story / Epic | Requirement |
A&AI | |||
AAF | |||
APPC | |||
CLAMP | |||
CC-SDK | |||
DCAE | |||
DMaaP | |||
External API | |||
HOLMES | |||
MODELING | |||
Multi-VIM / Cloud | |||
OOF | |||
OOM | |||
POLICY | |||
PORTAL | |||
SDN-C | |||
SDC | |||
SO | |||
VID | |||
VF-C | |||
VNFRQTS | |||
VNF-SDK | |||
CDS |
List of PTLs:Approved Projects
*Each Requirement should be tracked by its own User Story in JIRA
USE CASE DIAGRAM
...