Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
  • Zoom bridge: https://zoom.us/j/283628617?pwd=aWM3WjliUkFtcGFPUEdEMStIRll1UT09  passcode: 248130 
  • PTL Recordings
  • Antitrust Policy Notice

We start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

Agenda

START RECORDING

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested byNotes / Links
1 hour

Cross-project discussions





Andreas Geißler 

Branching is still needed for documentation.  This is not ideal, but we would need to develop an alternative structure for the documentation to change it.  Conclusion is to keep this task for now.


Follow up from lasts week:  Create Jira tickets for each affected project to clean up Helm charts as part of AAF deprecation.

In progress - work being split among Fiachra, Andreas, and PTLs.  Not release dependent.

LF IT Support



Testing EnvironmentAndreas Geißler 

Update on status of daily tests after disabling MSB

Tests are working 100%.  Some small issues in gating.

Testing Improvement



CSIT Review



ToolChain Improvement



DocumentationNew Jenkins job

Other Improvement suggestion



Subcommittee Updates for PTLs

Project architectural reviews will now include a review of unresolved unmaintained repo Jira issues assigned to projects.

Sharing Best Practices



IF TIME ALLOWS ....
15 minsRelease status
  • Schedule
    • M3 is scheduled for March 23.
  • Milestone Status
  • Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
    keyREQ-1350
    • Confusion about status of MSBNo architectural review
    • Some consider MSB deprecated, but REQ-1350 describes it as "optional"
    • MSB PTL is working on a London release
    • Do we have the capacity to do daily testing of the MSB optional configuration?Is this a good idea?  Is it a good use of resources?
    • Recommend that the arch SC review and provide a recommendation

Andreas attending the arch subcommittee meeting to discuss MSB tomorrow (Mar 21)

5 minsUpcoming Events



10 minsRemaining Action Items



Zoom Chat Log 

07:49:21 From Andreas GEISSLER (DT) to Everyone:
    I will have to drop off now
08:00:00 From Liam Fallon to Everyone:
    I need to drop now.