...
| Jira No | Summary | Description | Status | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SBOM global implementation in ONAP | -Ticket was opened by Muddasar to LF IT - Signed SBOM implementation for all ONAP project at Global level (IT-25341) -TSC conditionally approved -PTL no objections | ongoing | Muddasar will check with Jess if she completed the work on SBOM signing. | |
| Security Questionnaire for CPS | CPS made some updates but we will check if this activity is completed. | ongoing | Pawel to chec kwith Lee Anjella. | |
Wrapping up the unmaintained repo task force – Amy: link | We wait till M4 for TSC presentation | |||
PTL meeting (April 3rd) | SBOM global implementation – go decision | |||
| Security test cases review | https://logs.onap.org/onap-integration/weekly/onap-weekly-dt-oom-kohn/2023-02/25_04-42/ -CI/CD pipeline aspects - infrastructure ans security test cases to be further elaborated -Objective is to identify opportunity for improvement to reduce risk of unwanted behavior and software build pipeline. -Improve automated test coverage for Security tests at integration stage. | We move this topic to next week agenda. | ||
PTL meeting (March 27th) | -New dates (1 week delay) for M3 (March 30th) and M4 (April 20th) | |||
TSC meeting (March 30th) | -China Telecom takeaways – why not using ONAP commercially -Dashboard could be the reason of CT customization | |||
| New ONAP contribution for Integration | Marek from DT might propose his candidature to become Integration PTL. | |||
ONAP model changes | -Follow more CNCF approach – independent projects driven by use cases -Integration assures network connectivity -Complementary to Nephio which seems to be more infra focus while ONAP is application -Minimum security and logging guidance is required | |||
SECCOM MEETING CALL WILL BE HELD ON 11th April 2023. | CPS Security updated questionnaire review by SECCOM - final round with CPS team. Muddasar will share deck for supply chain security via seccom distribution list. |
Recordings:
...