...
| Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Color code:
M1 Actual represents the assessment before M1. M1 Target represents, at M1 date, what the team plans to implement. M4 result represents what has been really implemented at M4 date . All these fields are self-assessed by the team. |
| AREA | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Design / Run-Time | (min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others) | (min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver) | (min: level 1 for runtime projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min TSC Recommendations | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | |
| Project Name | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| A&AI | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1+ (75% toward silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (see note #10) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Application Authorization Framework | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (see Note #11) | 2 * (See Note # 26) | 2 | 1+ | 2 * (See Note # 26) | 2 |
| APPC | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CLAMP | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Common Controller SDK | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| DCAE | D & R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (76% Silver) | 1+ (76% Silver) | 1+ (76% Silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ (see Note#14) | 1+ | 1+ (see Note#13) | 1+ | 1+ |
| DMaaP | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (see note #16) | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ (see note #17) | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| External API Framework | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 2 | 2 |
| Holmes | R | 2 |
| 2 |
| 1 | 2 | 1+ |
| 2 |
| 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Logging Enhancements Project | R | 2* (unable to test/verify) | 2 | 0 (See note #24) | 1 | 1 | 1 (see note #8) | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| POMBA (under but separate pod from Logging) | R | 2* (unable to test/verify) | 2 | 0 (See note #25) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Microservices Bus | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Modeling | D/R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Multi VIM/Cloud | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| MUSIC | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ONAP CLI | D & R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 Note #28 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 Note #28 | 2 | 2 | 2 Note #28 |
| ONAP Optimization Framework | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ONAP Usecase UI Project |
| R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Policy Framework Project Proposal | D & R | D: 1 R: 2 | D: 1 R: 2 | D: 1 R: 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | D: 2 R: 2 | 2 (silver) | 2 (silver) | 2 (silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Portal Platform Project Proposal | D & R | 1 | 2 (Note #27) | 2 | 1 | 2 (Note #27) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ | 2 (Note #27) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 (Note #27) | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ |
| SDN-C | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1+ (75% towards silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Service Design & Creation | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (Note #2) | 2 (Note #2) | 2 (Note #2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #12) | 1 (Note #12) | 1 (Note #12) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #10) | 1 (Note #10) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Service Orchestrator | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 (89% towards Silver) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| VFC | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| VID | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #8) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| VNF SDK | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ (Note #18) | 1+ | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 (Note #19) | 2 | 2 |
Note 1: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team;
...
Note 13: Level2 - Swagger definition completed; new component API's standardized with ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy and some existing component (VESCollector) updated
...
Note 18: VNFSDK Already support to expose API via Https, blocked http. oom updated.
Note 19: VNFSDK integrate OPNFV Dovetail and ONAP CLI to run the xNF Test cases and VNFSDK also have a portal to trigger the tests.Note 22: Integration doesn't deliver code to ONAP platform. Integration team will run ONAP platform stability and resiliency test after RC2 when release candidate is available. 2+ means that until frankfurt 72 hour stability was performed only on windriver lab. The goial would be to run it at least on 2 labs (windriver + E///, Orange, DT, ..)
Note 23: OOF lost passing badge as recommended by sec team late into Dublin release, due to hard coded credentials in OOM (please see PTL 2019-05-13 more details.)
Note 24: the logging project reads logs from other components and displays to Kibana.
...
Note 26: Assuming AAF Resource needs are met.
Note 27: Angular upgrade, Springboot upgrade and security updates planned in Frankfurt release for Portal.
Note 28: CLI https enabled, direct vaulnerability cleared with avaiable new 3rd party versions, but silver badge is not applied yet. so given with 1.5. increased manageability by providing additional commands already. usability increased with provided web console, linux console and direct mode