| Table of Contents | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
| title | Information for PTL |
|---|
This template is to be filled out for any project wishing to move to the "Mature" phase of the ONAP project lifecycle.
Once completed, remove this info box and the send the link for this page to onap-tsc@lists.onap.org to initiate the maturity review.
Per the ONAP Technical Community Document, the metrics for maturity review are:
›Successful participation in releases: The project demonstrates stable output (code base, documents) within its history of releases in accordance with the release policy.
›Architecture has been reviewed by the Architecture Committee
...
›Mature artifacts produced: The project demonstrates that the artifacts produced by the project are deployable (where applicable) and have been successfully deployed, configured and used by end users (typically, service providers).
Review Submission Date:
Project Description:
...
[clamp] Team meetings and minutes
Leadership Resources :
...
Role | Name | Linux Foundation Login (LFID) | Email Address |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTL | osgn422w | ||
| Committers | Sebastien Determe | sebdet | |
| Xue Gao | xuegao | ||
| ChrisC | |||
| Eddy HAUTOT | ehautot | eddy.hautot@intl.att.com |
Project & Release History
- How long the project has been an active: At launch of ONAP the date is 5th of November 22017
- Release Participation: All ONAP Releases (Amsterdam Release through Frankfurt Release)
- Engagement levels for past releases (up to 3):
- Commits per Release: see Release table below
- Contributors per Release: see Release table below
- Companies per release: see Release table below
Statistics taken from Bitergia : https://onap.biterg.io/app/kibana#/dashboard/Overview
Release name and timeframe commits contributors companies Amsterdam ( 1/1/2017 to 11/16/2017 ) 191 13 4 Beijing ( 11/17/2017 to 6/7/2018 ) 275 11 5 Cassablanca ( 6/8/2018 to 11/30/2018 ) 118 9 4 Dublin ( 12/1/2018 to 7/9/2019 ) 263 18 6 El Alto ( 7/10/2019 to 10/24/2019 ) 130 5 2 Frankfurt ( 10/25/2019 to 6/18/2020 ) 273 14 2
- Use Cases:
- Scale Out Use Case
- Self Serve Control Loop
...
- CLAMP hosted a booth and made a demo during 2018 Amsterdam ONS: https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/events/open-networking-summit-europe-2018/program/schedule/
- CLAMP had topic (unconference topic) during the 2019 Antwerpen DDF: https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/events/onap-ddf-opnfv-plugfest/
- CLAMP team has received kudos from the security subcommittee(Paweł Pawlak ), for the El Alto and Frankfurt releases, for the Effort put in reaching compliance with S3P recommendations in both of those releases.
- Current, as of today, ccode coverage is 73% see screenshot:
Control Loop Sub Committee:
The CLAMP Project has been active in the Control Loop subcommittee from its inception. Working very closely with Policy Framework and DCAE to support the automation and enhancement of Control Loops in ONAP.
The project shares weekly meetings with the Policy Framework Project.