...
b. A structured wiki, with designated spaces for brainstorming, feature description, architecture, guides, etc.
5. What approach do you think might work best for the ONAP wiki?
a. An automated "agent" that would constantly scan wiki content, flag incompatible pages and , if possible, automatically fix them.
b. A group of community members that will be tasked with constantly improving the wiki content.
6. Tell us about yourself - which best describes you?
a. I am a PTL/Committer/Contributor to one or more ONAP Project
...
d. I am a consultant/architect helping others use ONAP
e. I am not a non-ONAP Community member wishing to learn more about ONAP, but I found its Wiki too intimidating.