Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Committer diversity - prefer 3 or more companies represented; if only 2, then need diversity in companies contributing
  • S3P requirements not considered as gating for "mature" phase
  • "Mature" phase criteria are more about projects being "active" 


Presentation shared at  TSC meeting.  

View file
nameONAP Proj Maturity Review 23July2020.pptx
height150

Recordings of the working group meetings: 

maturity_rvw_working_group_20200721.mp4

maturity_rvw_working_group_20200722.mp4

maturity_rvw_working_group_20200812.mp4


Project Name

Recommended Disposition

on moving from incubation to mature

(approve, decline, revert)

Comments

(for approve: improvements that could be made,

for decline: steps needed to get to approve,

for revert: information needed for recommendation)

AAIapprove

recommend improving committer diversity where possible

4/16/2021 The sub project ESR is now unmaintained - Project State: Unmaintained

CCSDKapprovecontinue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc.

CLAMP

TBDdecline

strong project, but need to improve company diversity in both committers and contributors

4/16/2021 The functionalities of this project are now merged with the Policy project -

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
keyREQ-684

CLIdeclineneed participation in the most recent release; need to document architecture review
DCAEapprovecontinue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc.
DMaaPapproverecommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review
External API Frameworkapprove

improve wiki documentation on release content; continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc.


Holmesdeclineneed participation in the most recent release; need to increase contributor and committer diversity; need recent architecture review
Modelingapprove
MSBrevertplease add information on contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of MSB by operators or others
MultiCloudrevertrevert  approve (updated Aug 12, 2020)please add information on contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of MultiCloud by operators or others
ONAP PortalTBD or revertdecline

need to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee; please add information on deployment/use of ONAP Portal by operators or others

4/16/2021 The Portal project is now unmaintained - Project State: Unmaintained

OOFapproverecommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review for any components not already reviewed (CMSO?)
Policy Frameworkapprove
SDCapproveconduct a more current architecture review with a focus on overlap of DCAE-D with DCAE-MOD.
SDNCrevert  approve (updated Aug 12, 2020)please update the wiki page with the new committers, add information on test coverage and contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of SDNC by operators or others
SOapproveplease add information on test coverage; please add information on deployment/use of SO by operators or others
Usecase UIapproverecommend improving committer diversity where possible
VFCrevert  approve (updated Aug 12, 2020)recommendation for future is to avoid bulk commits and & focus on steady contributions and commits.  please address all questions in the comments; also ensure that all committers are active
VNFSDKrevertplease document the review with the architecture subcommittee; please ensure that all committers are active
VVPdeclineneed to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee;