General Information:
- Date and Time: 2020, June 29th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
- Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/97595070639
- Meeting Recording:
- Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
- Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
- Model Proposals - 50 minutes
- allotted resource - 20 minutes
- ETSI alignment - 20 minutes ?
- 5G RAN service - 0 minutes
- CNF - 0 minutes
- Geolocation - 10 minutes ?
- PNF instance model - 0 minutes
- Modeling Documentation & Glossary - 5 minutes
- Modeling Process discussion - 0 minutes
...
- Allotted Resource Revised
- Allotted Resource Model Review Comments
- Allotted Resource for Network Slicing
- 5G RAN SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION in R6 Frankfurt
- Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling
- ONAP R7 Modeling High Level Requirements
...
- Agenda bashing
- vacation plan:
- Jacqueline: July 6th~19th
- others: no plan or not decided
- vacation plan:
- Model Proposals
- CPS model driven PoC (from Jacqueline)
- background: many models, ONAP may not need to understand them, but needs to access them
- PoC:
- create/read operations using YANG fragments
- parse models from YANG fragments
- runtime behavior based on YANG fragments
- proposal:
- to have xNF instance/schema models, to enable YANG parsing, model mapping, etc.
- preliminary plan:
- in root model:
- next step:
- Jacqueline will create a wiki page and upload the slides and related material for people to have further thoughts and comments
- geolocation model
- quick report on DDF presentation and progress
- latest SOL001 spec would include geolocation attribute
- next step:
- propose details of the "place" class
- plan for ETSI alignment & CNF model
- intended scope of ETSI alignment: enhancement of current VNF and NS models
- Fred is analyzing the differences between v2.7.1/v2.8.1 and v.2.5.1, will present later
- Thinh will help contact spec rapporteurs to provide more information
- plan for CNF model
- for CNF model, would prefer to wait for more progress in ETSI spec (IFA011, etc.)
- R7 approach (as suggested by arc team) could be different from ETSI, may be helpful if define some models related to the actual solution
- collaboration/feedback to ETSI is welcomed
- CPS model driven PoC (from Jacqueline)
- Modeling Documentation
- no discuss
- R6 readthedocs review: https://onap-doc.readthedocs.io/projects/onap-modeling-modelspec/en/latest/index.html
- AP1: exchange Mult. - Type and Description - Stereotypes columns for the associations (Xu)
- AP2: simplify the sterotypes for the associations (Jacqueline and Xu)
- add relationship documentation to the UML guideline:
Jira Legacy server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key ONAPMODEL-28 - UML principle wiki page:
...