General Information:
- Date and Time: 2020, March 9th, 10pm~11pm Beijing Time, 10am~11am US Eastern
- Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
- Meeting Recording: zoom_0.mp4
- Meeting Chat Log:
View file name meeting_saved_chat.txt height 150
Agenda:
- Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
- Meeting time change? (DST)
- ETSI NFV R3 feedback
- Modeling glossary
- Modeling Documentation - 0 minutes
- Model Proposals - 40 minutes
- PNF instance model
- license management
- allotted resource
- 5G RAN service
- Modeling Process discussion - 10 minutes
Material:
- License Management (Moved to Clean)
- License Model Review Comments
- Allotted Resource Revised
- Allotted Resource Model Review Comments
- 5G RAN SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION in R6 Frankfurt
- Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling
Minutes:
- Agenda bashing:
- Meeting time change
- check if people would like to move the meeting time 1 hour earlier since the DST has begun in US
- feedback:
- both: Andy
- prefer not to shift: Michela (overlap with ETSI-alignment call)
- prefer to shift: Ben (to avoid overlapping with the requirement call)
- AP:
- Ben to check the requiremnt call will change the meeting time
- Alla will not change for now (the requirement call will work by UTC time)
- Michela to check the ETSI-alignment call will change the meeting time
- Ben to check the requiremnt call will change the meeting time
- ETSI NFV R3 feedback
- ONAP R7 Modeling High Level Requirements has been created, would plan to discuss in the near future
- Ben could share the wiki page to use case team for feedback
- Modeling glossary
- Xu is working on a review wiki page
- Meeting time change
- Modeling Documentation
- suggestion from Michela: to add relationship documentation in the model (not only in the diagrams), and create Jira for it
- Q: how to document the relationship classes in the papyrus?
- will discuss later
- AP:
- add diagrams to readthedocs
- create "index" wiki page for approved models
- under ONAP Modeling specification?
- suggestion from Michela: to add relationship documentation in the model (not only in the diagrams), and create Jira for it
- Model Proposals
- PNF instance model
- Jacqueline has generated PNF instance model from A&AI input
- the problem is the model still doesn't have attribute descriptions
- Jacqueline suggests to ask Jimmy to re-start the reverse engineering call to solve this problem
- Andy suggests to reverse engineering from the swagger documents (instead of UMLs)
- AP: Jacqueline will talk with Jimmy about this issue, Andy will help create a long-term call if needed
- license management
- License Model Review Comments
- #1: discuss how to document relationship classes
- Xu will create a Jira and update the wiki page
- #2: add a label to the diagram explaining why the model is refered to only VNFD now
- will update
- #3: SPPoolLimit and VendorPoolLimit are not found in the "resource onboarding" page, i.e., no evidence for including them in the model
- Andy will double check
- #4: question on how to deal with EntitlementInstance and LicenseKeyInstance in the approval? (suggest to keep "experimental", i.e., not requesting approval, for the current proposal)
- Xu will create a Jira to discuss how to deal with the experimental classes in the readthedocs
- #5: there is an attribute marked using "Future" stereotype, suggest not to use the "Future" stereotype
- is "Future" stereotype needed compared with the "Experimental" stereotype?
- no "Future" stereotype is defined in the "lifecycle stereotype proposal"
- Andy will check and remove "Future" if it exists
- is "Future" stereotype needed compared with the "Experimental" stereotype?
- #1: discuss how to document relationship classes
- License Model Review Comments
- allotted resource
- 5G RAN service model
- presentation of the A&AI discussion on this topic
- PNF instance model
- Modeling Process Discussion
- discuss the current status of the modeling process discussion
- focus on modeling generation and approval process
- during the process, modeling subcom needs to negotiate with arc, use case and other communities for modeling design
- suggest to add checklist to M3
- for use case team and also projects like A&AI, etc. to check the model impacts
- see Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling