Create 'bulk' version for org.onap.cps.ncmp.rest.controller.NetworkCmProxyController#getResourceDataForCmHandle to support multiple cm-handles (~ multiple anchors in in CPS-Core)
Table of Contents |
---|
References
- CPS-1515 - Spike: Support multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation
- CPS-NCMP ↔ DMI-Plugin Interface Details Jakarta-R10
- CPS Events Structure
Requirements
Functional
...
Error Handling
...
Capabilities
...
- Async response available on client topic
- No delay in DMI PLugin (tested/measured using stub DMI Plugin)
...
Expand |
---|
2. Postgres
|
...
Out-of-scope
- Support for multiple resource identifiers in one batch operation
- Support cached data batch requests: only passthrough datastores will be supported (see decision #2)
- NCMP does NOT keep track of request status to see if it is completed, amalgamate responses or anything like that. It wil simply forward responses from the internal topic to the client topic.
- Access control
Assumptions
...
#
...
Assumption
...
Notes
...
Proprietary options or not in the scope of this analysis.
...
agreed with kieran mccarthy ; these are optional parameters (name-value pairs) not interpreted by NCMP but can be interpreted by proprietary plugins
In the future "scope" might become standardized instead of proprietary but that wil be achieved through a separate requirement
...
same xpath (resourceIdentifierInQuery) for all cm handles or different for each cm handle
...
agreed with kieran mccarthy ; if different resources are required on the same cm-handle the client wil send another (batch) request
...
- options, resourceIdentifier is optional for bulk operations.
- operation, datastore and cmhandleIds are mandatory fields
...
agreed with CPS team.
...
agreed
...
Get batch operation does not support includeDescendants as it is impl. for
pass through datastore only
ncmp-datastore:passthrough-running and
ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational
...
agreed on
Issues & Decisions
...
#
...
Issue
...
Notes
...
Decision
...
- Get
- Create
- Update (Put)
- Patch
- Delete
if many what is the priority?
...
agreed with kieran mccarthy
Only Get (read)
(in future other operations might be support batch option too)
...
Which datasources should be supported?
...
Do we need to support passthrough-only no-cached() data only ?
(maybe just start with that, support cached data bulk request later)
...
agreed with kieran mccarthy :
all passthrough datastores will be supported
Not implemented (yet) response, for non passthrough datastores
...
Existing : /v1/ch/{cm-handle}/data/ds/{datastore-name}
CPS Proposed : /v1/batch/data/ds/{datastore-name}
( include cm handles into payload / body and leave datastore into url)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meeting : kafka message schema & batch interface extension
POST http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/batch/data&topic=my-topic-name
{
operations: [
{
operation: read,
datastore: "...",
options: "...",
resourceIdentifier: "...",
cmhandleIds: [4, 6]
},
{
operation: read,
datastore: "...",
options: "...",
resourceIdentifier: "...",
cmhandleIds: [1, 2, 3]
}
]
}
POST http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/data&topic=my-topic-name
agreed with kieran mccarthy : Follow the existing interfaces as much as possible for consistency and efficiency
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We had an internal review with some of our rApp colleagues around some of the recent proposed NCMP batch interface and they came back with some valid comment.
The proposal is that we should not distinguish batch from bulk or other flavours of read/write.
The aim is to only have a single flavour of interface for read or write for clients. Therefore the proposal is to drop “batch” from the interface URL and just act toward “data” (reads/writes/actions)
Before | After |
---|---|
| POST http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/data&topic=my-topic-name |
...
CPS prefers keep interface similar as single cm handle interface (consistency and cost)
Existing : ...&topic=topicParamInQuery
...
agreed with kieran mccarthy : Follow the existing interfaces as much as possible for consistency and efficiency
...
support in ONAP DMI-plugin
...
agreed with Toine Siebelink : ONAP plugin can respond with not implemented yet code,
...
Response always Async ie. topic is compulsory ?
...
Agreed with kieran mccarthy :
Topic is optional but system will respond with 'Not implemented (yet when not specified or blank
...
Agreed with kieran mccarthy : NCMP wil only forward to client topic no handling tracking or any responses or status of request
...
Agreed with kieran mccarthy :
No response for 4b then send an error response to the topic given by client
...
Agreed with kieran mccarthy :
NCMP can log error when forward to 'client topic' Security not in scope (yet)
...
Suggestions
- Silently ignore
- (initial) error response
- should we combine all errors in one message?
...
Agreed with kieran mccarthy :
Additional error (messages) response with all cm-handles that cannot be resolved, also a separate error message wil be sent for each failed DMI
...
Overlap/clash with Deutsche Telekom user story:
Jira Legacy | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
discussed in weekly ONAP meeting the DT user story is affect CPS-Core interface (not NCMP) and the requirement is to execute a query over ALL cm-handles (cached only?!) instead of a given list of cm-handles (~anchors)
...
Schema of bulk response
Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1) Agreement required on the structure of the response. Please see response structure below.
2) Does 'eventTime' field which holds the timestamp of the bulk response event, required or can it be dropped?
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema",
"$id": "urn:cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async:batch-event-schema:1.0.0",
"$ref": "#/definitions/BatchDataResponseEvent",
"definitions": {
"BatchDataResponseEvent": {
"description": "The payload of batch event.",
"type": "object",
"javaType" : "org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async.v1.BatchEvent",
"properties": {
"event": {
"description": "The content of Batch event.",
"type": "object",
"existingJavaType": "java.lang.Object",
"additionalProperties": false
}
},
"required": [
"event"
],
"additionalProperties": false
}
}
} |
...
title | Sample Batch Event Payload |
---|---|
collapse | true |
...
Create 'bulk' version for org.onap.cps.ncmp.rest.controller.NetworkCmProxyController#getResourceDataForCmHandle to support multiple cm-handles (~ multiple anchors in in CPS-Core)
Table of Contents |
---|
References
- CPS-1515 - Spike: Support multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation
- CPS-NCMP ↔ DMI-Plugin Interface Details Jakarta-R10
- CPS Events Structure
Requirements
Functional
# | Interface | Requirement | Additional Information |
---|---|---|---|
1 | REST CPS(-NCMP)-E-05 | Support batch read operation (new) using an asynchronous response on a client specified topic | payload includes list of cm handle ids |
2 | REST DMI-I-01 | Support batch read operation (new) using an asynchronous response to an internal topic | payload includes list of (associated for this plugin) cm handles ids with their private (additional) properties |
Error Handling
# | Error Scenario | Expected behavior |
---|---|---|
1 | DMI Not respond to initial synchronous request with normal HTTP timeout | Special Error message (Kafka event) including affected, and reason for all the handles in the message cm handles send to client topic detailing cm-handles (per dmi plugin) |
2 | Topic not supplied on CPS-E-05 | Return HTTP 501 (not implemented) |
3 | Client specided Topic is not configured | Log error message only |
4 | Non-existing cm-handle id | Similar message but different reason as specified #1 above |
Capabilities
Excerpt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Out-of-scope
- Support for multiple resource identifiers in one batch operation
- Support cached data batch requests: only passthrough datastores will be supported (see decision #2)
- NCMP does NOT keep track of request status to see if it is completed, amalgamate responses or anything like that. It wil simply forward responses from the internal topic to the client topic.
- Access control
Assumptions
# | Assumption | Notes |
---|---|---|
1 | Proprietary options or not in the scope of this analysis. | agreed with kieran mccarthy ; these are optional parameters (name-value pairs) not interpreted by NCMP but can be interpreted by proprietary plugins |
2 | same xpath (resourceIdentifierInQuery) for all cm handles or different for each cm handle | agreed with kieran mccarthy ; if different resources are required on the same cm-handle the client wil send another (batch) request |
3 |
| agreed with CPS team. |
4 | We are not merging any duplicate cm handles while sending request to dmi-plugin | agreed |
5 | Get batch operation does not support includeDescendants as it is impl. for pass through datastore only ncmp-datastore:passthrough-running and ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational | agreed on |
Issues & Decisions
# | Issue | Notes | Decision | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Which operation(s) need support for multiple cm handles? |
if many what is the priority? | agreed with kieran mccarthy Only Get (read) (in future other operations might be support batch option too) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Which datasources should be supported? | Do we need to support passthrough-only no-cached() data only ? | agreed with kieran mccarthy : all passthrough datastores will be supported Not implemented (yet) response, for non passthrough datastores | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | URL pattern for NCMP bulk endpoints | We had an internal review with some of our rApp colleagues around some of the recent proposed NCMP batch interface and they came back with some valid comment. The proposal is that we should not distinguish batch from bulk or other flavors of read/write. The aim is to only have a single flavor of interface for read or write for clients. Therefore the proposal is to drop “batch” from the interface URL and just act toward “data” | Agreed with team kieran mccarthy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | keep datastore, topic and optional parameters in the URL itself instead into body. | CPS prefers keep interface similar as single cm handle interface (consistency and cost) Existing : ...&topic=topicParamInQuery | agreed with kieran mccarthy : Follow the existing interfaces as much as possible for consistency and efficiency | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | support in ONAP DMI-plugin | agreed with Toine Siebelink : ONAP plugin can respond with not implemented yet code, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | Response always Async ie. topic is compulsory ? | Assume topic is compulsory (defined in OPenApi) → Response therefore wil be 400 if not supplied | Agreed with kieran mccarthy : Topic is optional but system will respond with 'Not implemented (yet when not specified or blank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | Should NCMP Amalgamate Async responses from DMI-Plugin before forwarding ? | step 6 in flow diagram | Agreed with kieran mccarthy : NCMP wil only forward to client topic no handling tracking or any responses or status of request | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Handle non responding dmi-plugin | Agreed with kieran mccarthy : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | Should (can) NCMP check if 'MyTopic' specified by client exist | Consider Access Control too. For now NCMP can log error. Client is responsible for topic setup | Agreed with kieran mccarthy : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | How to handle non-existing CM-Handles (id) | Suggestions
| Agreed with kieran mccarthy : Additional error (messages) response with all cm-handles that cannot be resolved, also a separate error message wil be sent for each failed DMI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Overlap/clash with Deutsche Telekom user story:
| discussed in weekly ONAP meeting the DT user story is affect CPS-Core interface (not NCMP) and the requirement is to execute a query over ALL cm-handles (cached only?!) instead of a given list of cm-handles (~anchors) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | Schema of bulk response
| 1) Agreement required on the structure of the response. Please see response structure below. | Need to follow schema structure there in #15 under Issues & Decisions section and it is agreed on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 |
CPS-1557 - NCMP : forward bulk response messages to client topic |
| Agreed on to keep one schema for both events (DMI → NCMP) and (NCMP → ClientApps) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | How NCMP would forward response? (Response data : ref. message flow #6)
| 1. Do we need to send only one response containing all the requested cm handles ? | This could lead to to much data in the event for large batch requests. Csaba Kocsis , Sourabh Sourabh and Toine Siebelink proposed to us single event for each cm handle | Just is a list of IDS should be OK. | kieran mccarthy Confirmed in meeting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Message format for the batch interface | some non-standard headers wil need to be implemented as 'extensions' and names to be confirmedcorrelationid target | We have had some internal discussions including with some O-RAN standards representatives and one of the outcomes is that it would be good if we aligned with the some community standards for event header definitions. IT is proposed (initially from AT&T) that we should follow Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) specification as defined in their cloudevents incubator project. More details see CPS Events Structure#CNCFCloudEventalignment Some non-standard headers wil need to be implemented as 'extensions' and names to be confirmed
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | NCMP | wilwill send only one request to each DMI | Code Block |
NCMP batch endpoint : http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/data?&topic=my-topic-name ' \ --header 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --header 'Authorization: Basic Y3BzdXNlcjpjcHNyMGNrcyE=' \ --data '{ "operations": [ { "operation": "read", "operationId": "12", "datastore":DMI-Plugin batch endpoint : http://172.26.202.25:8783/dmi/v1/data?topic=my-topic-name&requestId=e6fa4d26-4dc1-4877-aa3c-45e99f840708
Code Block |
| Agreed with Csaba Kocsis and kieran mccarthy | |||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | Feature Name (events) | event type proposal : from DataOperationEvent For example : DataOperationResponseEvent 'eventType' value as below 'org.onap.cps.ncmp.events. proposed Operation like : 'org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.DataOperationEvent' 'batch' was the keyword use in the URL for this feature (now gone) but much code (classnames, variable names) etc uses this name still... | kieran mccarthy and Team agreed on and some cost (1-2 days) is acceptable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 | What would be the field name of response data? | data .responses[0].data | kieran mccarthy please confirm : we are using 'responseContent' as name of this field as 'data' is already used for cloud event standard payload. Now it is like : Sourabh Sourabh Suggest to use "result". This is after all where the actual result output. the other tags in responses[x] are status related to the request : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | Exact format of timestamp of cloud events. | CloudEvent documentation (https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/blob/v1.0.2/cloudevents/spec.md#time) refers on ISO8601 standard (see org.onap.cps.ncmp.api.impl.utils.EventDateTimeFormatter ) | Toine Siebelink Although not clearly communicated before ISO8601 is the standard to be used and it seems the current implementation in NCMP conforms to this standard |
Event Format Definitions
Event Headers
Insert excerpt | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Event Body (data)
- The current proposal is to use the CNFC Event structure and library as detail in CPS Events Structure#CNCFCloudEventalignment
- To prevent problems with large data request multiple response event will be sent for a successful read for each cm handle (id)
- Error messages can contain information about single cm handle ids
Field | Type | Description | Mandatory? | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | The payload of an event | Mandatory | Cloud event standard (data ) | ||||||||
| Array | contains an array or batch response that includes both success and failure. | Mandatory | |||||||||
| String | specified to distinguish multiple operations using same cmhandleId | Mandatory | |||||||||
| String | cmhandle-ids | Mandatory | Example : ["0df4d39af6514d99b816758148389cfd"] | ||||||||
| String | Mandatory | Common NCMP defined error codes:
| |||||||||
| String | Mandatory | Examples for code & message :
| |||||||||
data .responses[0].data | Object | Optional |
|
Implementation
Bulk Request Message Flow
Gliffy | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Message Flow details
Flow Step | Short description | Message Details | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulk Get Request |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Define new get operation "getResourceDataForCmHandles" into ncmp.yml | ||||||||||
2 | Ack client Request |
|
|
| |||||||||||
3 | DMI Bulk Request |
|
|
|
|
Agreed with Csaba Kocsis and kieran mccarthy
requestId would be send as a path param from NCMP to DMI-plugin.
Example
NCMP batch endpoint : http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/data?&topic=my-topic-name
DMI-Plugin batch endpoint : http://172.26.202.25:8783/dmi/v1/data?topic=my-topic-name&requestId=e6fa4d26-4dc1-4877-aa3c-45e99f840708
- Mandatory Fileds :
- "operation": "read"
- "operationId": "12"
"datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational" - "targetIds": [ "0df4d39af6514d99b816758148389cfd", "ec2e9495679a43c58659c07d87025e72" ]
- Optional Fields :
- "options": "(fields=schemas/schema)"
- "resourceIdentifier": "parent/child"
event type proposal : from BatchDataXXXEvent to
DataOperationXXXEvent
For example : DataOperationResponseEvent
'eventType' value as below 'org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.BatchDataXXXEvent'
proposed Operation like :
'org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.DataOperationXXXEvent'
'batch' was the keyword use in the URL for this feature (now gone) but much code (classnames, variable names) etc uses this name still...
Event Format Definitions
Event Headers
...
Event Body (data)
- The current proposal is to use the CNFC Event structure and library as detail in CPS Events Structure#CNCFCloudEventalignment
- To prevent problems with large data request a single response event will be sent for a successful read for each cm handle (id)
- Error message can contain information about multiple cm handle ids
...
Field
...
Type
...
Description
...
Mandatory?
...
Notes
...
event
...
Mandatory
...
event.responses[0, 1, 2, ...]
...
Mandatory
...
event.responses[0].operationId
...
Mandatory
...
event.responses[0].ids
...
Mandatory
...
Example : ["0df4d39af6514d99b816758148389cfd"]
Note: Ids array should contain only a single element in the array in case of success messages and In case of error it can have any number of elements.
...
event.responses[0].statusCode
...
Mandatory
...
Common NCMP defined error codes:
- status-code 0-99 is reserved for any success response
- status-code from 100 to 199 is reserved for any failed response.
...
event.responses[0].statusMessage
...
Mandatory
Examples for code & message :
statusCode | statusMessage |
---|---|
1 | "Successfully applied changes" |
101 | "cmHandle(s) do not exist" |
...
Optional
...
- In case of success :
- Optional, for write operations then no need to return configurations
application/yang-patch+json | application/yang-data+json
- Optional, for write operations then no need to return configurations
- In case of failure :
- Optional, any supplementary error data matching the error status-code
Implementation
Bulk Request Message Flow
Gliffy | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Message Flow details
Flow Step | Short description | Message Details | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulk Get Request |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
body:
["cm-1",...,"cm-n"] |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
'http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/batch/data/ds/ncmp-datastore:passthrough-running?resourceIdentifier=parent/child%26options=(a=1,b=2)&topic=my-topic-name&options=(fields=schemas/schema)' \
--header 'Authorization: Basic Y3BzdXNlcjpjcHNyMGNrcyE=' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '[ "40137a9771f84459affa795fa1d633ab", "f5a92ec7a7db4d6fbb0e0ce2803a86cc" ]' |
Define new get operation "getResourceDataForCmHandles" into ncmp.yml
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{"requestId":"123"} |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
body: {"Cmhandles":["cm-1",...,"cm-n"],"requestId":123} |
The DMI Plugin should be told (included in request) the client topic so that NCMP does not have to 'remember' to relation between request id and client topic!
title | Response 202 |
---|---|
collapse | true |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{ "eventId": "datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-running", "cmHandles": [ { "id": "ec2e9495679a43c58659c07d87025e72", "cmHandleProperties": { "neType": "RadioNode" } }, { "id": "0df4d39af6514d99b816758148389cfd", "cmHandleProperties": { "neType": "RadioNode" } } ] } ] DMI Service 2 (POST) : http://172.26.202.26:8783/dmi/v1/data?topic=my-topic-name&requestId=4753fc1f-7de2-449a-b306-a6204b5370b3 -> [ { "operationType": "read", "operationId": "12", "datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational", "options": "some option", "resourceIdentifier": "parent/child", "cmHandles": [ { "id": "836bb62201f34a7aa056a47bd95a81ed", "cmHandleProperties": { "neType": "RadioNode" } }, { "id": "202acb75b4a54e43bb1ff8c0c17a8e08", "cmHandleProperties": { "neType": "RadioNode" } } ] } ] |
New JIRA
Jira Legacy | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Discussed with Csaba Kocsis and agreed to send identical data request body as NCMP where data operation requat body is as follows:
Client App→ NCMP | NCMP→ DMI | Agreed |
---|---|---|
operation | operationType | operation |
operation details are wrapped into parent attribute "operations" like "operations": [ ... | operation details ar not wrapped | wrap operation details into parent attribute "operations" |
NCMP→ DMI | Current NCMP→ DMI | Proposed NCMP→ DMI |
---|---|---|
{ | [ | { |
Code Block | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{ "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema", "$id": "urn:cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async:batch-event-schema:1.0.0", "$ref": "#/definitions/BatchDataResponseEvent", "definitions": { "BatchDataResponseEvent": { "description": "The payload of batch event.", "type": "object", "javaType" : "org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async.v1.BatchEvent", "properties": { "4cb32729-85e3-44d1-aa6e-c923b9b059a5", "eventCorrelationId": "68f15800-8ed4-4bae-9e53-27a9e03e1911", "eventTime":event": { "description": "The content of "2023-03-28T14:29:23.876+0000Batch event.", "eventTarget": "client-topic"type": "object", "eventSource": "existingJavaType"dmi-plugin:enm-1"(dmi service name): "java.lang.Object", "eventType": "additionalProperties": false "org.onap.cps.ncmp.event.model.BulkResponseEvent", "eventSchema": } "urn:cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async:batch-event-schema:1.0.0", "schemaVersion": }, "1.0.0", } |
title | Batch Event Payload |
---|---|
collapse | true |
required": [ "event" |
], " |
additionalProperties": false |
|
|
|
|
} } } |
Table
|
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{ "eventId": "4cb32729-85e3-44d1-aa6e-c923b9b059a5", "eventCorrelationId": "68f15800-8ed4-4bae-9e53-27a9e03e1911", "eventTimeevent": { "2023-03-28T14:29:23.876+0000", "eventSource": "dmi-plugin:enm-1"(dmi service name) "eventType": "org.onap.cps.ncmp.event.model.BulkResponseEvent", "eventSchema": "urn:cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async:batch-event-schema:1.0.0", "schemaVersion": "1.0.0", } |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{
"event": {
"payload": "response of batch cm handles"
}
} |
Response message structure ? (Flow no. 5)
Non responding DMI-plugin
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{
"timestamp":"2023-03-01T23:00:00.345-0400",
"requestId":123,
"error": "DMI Service Unavailable, {service-name}",
"Cmhandles":["cm-1",...,"cm-n"]
} |
Response message structure ? (Flow no. 5)
Non existing cm handles
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{
"timestamp":"2023-03-01T23:00:00.345-0400",
"requestId":123,
"error":"Cm-Handle not found",
"Cmhandles":["cm-1",...,"cm-n"]
} |
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
{
"timestamp":"2023-03-01T23:00:00.345-0400",
"requestId":123,
"error":"Cm-Handle not in READY state.",
"Cmhandles":["cm-1",...,"cm-n"]
} |
Existing DMI endpoints are :
/v1/ch/{cmHandle}/data/ds/{datastore-name}
datastore-name:
- ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational
- ncmp-datastore:passthrough-running
...&topic=topicParamInQuery
CPS Proposed :
/v1/ch/batch/data/ds/{datastore-name}
...&topic=topicParamInQuery
cm handle ids and requestid into body
Proposed JIRAs :
| ||||||||||
6 | Kafka Message(s) from NCMP to Client Table |
| Single response format for all scenarios bot positive and error, just using optional fields instead | |||||||
7 | Error for 4/5 → Non responding DMI, non existing CM Handles or any other error. NCMP will have to create error message detailing all cm-handle ids affect by that error. |
| Single response format for all scenarios bot positive and error, just using optional fields instead See decision # 8 |
Proposed JIRAs :
Priority | Component | Description | JIRAs | Estimate | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DMI, NCMP | Data operation response event (DMI → NCMP) to Comply with Cloud Events |
| 5 Days (M) | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | NCMP | Data operation response event (NCMP → Client App) |
| TBD | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | DMI-Plugin | Accept datastore name as param into URL |
| 5 Days | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | NCMP | Expose REST endpoint to accept collection of cm handles for GET operation (Passthrough only) |
| 15 Days | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | DMI-Plugin | Expose endpoint for ONAP not impl. and Stub impl. for testing/demo |
| 5 Days | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | NCMP | NCMP: Update existing REST endpoint that accepts data operation request for GET operation |
| 5 Days (M) | New Requirement. | 2 | NCMP | Batch Response Event (NCMP → Client App) | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7 | DMI-Plugin | DMI-Plugin : Update endpoint to accept data operation request |
| TBD | New Requirement. | 3 | DMI-Plugin | Accept datastore name as param into URL |
| 5
| 3 Days | Done | 4 | NCMP | Expose REST endpoint to accept collection of cm handles for GET operation (Passthrough only)||||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Stubbed DMI-Plugin | Include code to send response messages to internal kafka topic with delay |
| 15 10 Days | Code is merged and Delivered, Pending task id RTD document only | 5 | DMI-Plugin | Expose endpoint for ONAP not impl. and Stub impl. for testing/demo Done | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | NCMP | Forward response messages to client given kafka topic |
| 5 Days | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
610 | NCMP | NCMP: Update existing REST endpoint that accepts bulk request for GET operationNCMP | Handle non-existing cm handles |
| 5 Days | new because Requirements changed +5 days | 7 | DMI-Plugin | DMI-Plugin : Update endpoint to accept bulk request |
server | System Jira | columnIds | issuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution | columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolutionDone | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | NCMP | Error handling for non-ready cm handle state |
| 3 5 Days | Submitted (In code review state) | 8 | StubbedDone | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | NCMP | Handle non responding DMI-Plugin | Include code to send response messages to internal kafka topic with delay |
| 10 5 Days | In progress Done | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | NCMP | Forward response messages to client given kafka topic | 13 | CSIT test for demo |
| 1557
| 5 Days | Re-opened | 10 | NCMP | Handle non-existing cm handles |
| 5 Days | |||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | NCMP | Error handling for non-ready cm handle state |
| 5 Days | In progress | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | NCMP | Handle non responding DMI-Plugin | Done | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 | Update RTD |
| 4 Daya | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | Test performance | Capabilities |
| 1558
| 5 3 Days | 13 | CSIT test for demo Done (NCMP: Read data operation resource API Performance for multiple cm-handles) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | NCMP | Modify DMI data operation request body. |
| 5 2 Days | Done |
Planning :
- Allow for 2 more user stories each may take 1 weeks
- Based on 2 resource working parallelly may take approx..
8 weeks from 29 March 2023 - (updated after additional items where added) The estimated date for completion is ) The estimated date for completion is
The release for cps-and-ncmp 3.3.3 version is completed on Friday,
Release tag : https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=cps.git;a=tag;h=refs%2Ftags%2F3.3.3
- Demo recording can be referred here : https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/CPS+User+Story+Demos