DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS
The following items are expected to be completed for the project to Pass the M2 Functionality Freeze Milestone.
M2 Release Functionality Freeze Milestone definition.
...
| title | Usage |
|---|
...
...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidence - Comment | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Are all provisional APIs interface (stub) been defined (at beta-quality level)? | no | no new API were identified | |
| Is there a final list of externally consumable APIs available? | no | will be provided | ||
For all completed Sprints, have Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | n/a | 1st sprint not yet complete | Difference between a Product and Sprint Backlog | |
Are all tasks associated with the completed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | n/a | 1st sprint not yet complete | ||
| Release Management | Have all source code files been updated with License Apache 2 header? | Yes | Specific rules and instruction are available in ONAP wiki. | |
| Has the year format in copyright header of all source code files been updated? (Rules for new files created in 2017 and existing files modified in 2017 are different) | yes | Guidance on year format | ||
| In case source code can't be edited, has a "License.txt" file been placed at the root directory for which the license is applicable? | yes | Guidance for source code file that can't be edited | ||
| Has the project FOSS Table been updated with latest third party code? | yes | Virtual Infrastructure Deployment | Your project FOSS table is located under Project FOSS master page | |
| Do you have a plan to address any issue raised by Fossology? | yes | No issues are identified | If any issues arise with Fossology, they will be addressed | |
Have all API projects dependencies been captured? | yes | no new dependencies have been identified | The source of information for the API dependency is the "API Incoming Dependency" of the M1 Release Planning deliverable. Please update the source accordingly, and let The Release Manager aware of the changes. | |
| Development | For new projects approved for this release, have all defined repositories source code been placed into Gerrit? | N/A | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | |
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | No, this is work in progress | Goal: 30-50% for Incubation project | ||
| Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | Yes | no binaries are currently in the repo | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | |
| Could you ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, company name, etc. have been removed? All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols. | No | This item is currently under discussion between AT&T Legal & LF Legal | ||
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 business hours in Gerrit? | No | |||
| Have all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/vid/ | ||
| Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | https://nexus.onap.org/#nexus-search;quick~org.openecomp.vid | ||
| Integration and Testing | Have functional test cases been documented in wiki? | Yes | VID R1 Amsterdam - M2 Functional Test Cases | |
| Have you implemented in Jenkins at least 1 functional test case for each of the project repository? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/vid/job/vid-master-verify-csit-healthCheck/ (the other repository is library, not dockerized) | As an example (provided by Integration Team) | |
| Has the project code successfully passed the Build process? | yes | Goal is to ensure your project latest commits have not broken the build. | ||
| Documentation | Has the team identified and outlined the set of documentations to be delivered in this Release? | Yes | Documentation Epic |