Table of Contents |
---|
...
Table of Contents |
---|
Overview
Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- This page gives a description of CPS events including their fields
- Events will be split into events and Headers
Issues & Decisions
- This page gives a description of CPS events including their fields
- Events will be split into events and Kafka headers
Issues & Decisions
Priyank Maheshwari will need to specify and agreed event structure for DMI AVC Event with stakeholders ie. provide Jira ticket
Event Body should be compatible with RFC8641
kieran mccarthy has confirmed.
Priyank Maheshwari created JIRA to create the event body schema.
Sourabh Sourabh to provide Jira tickets
Jira Legacy | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
kieran mccarthy Possibly Common (base) set of headers but mandatory aspect might differ. In practice we might need a separate headers (schema?) for each event
v1 or 1.0
EX: 1.0.0 (without 'v')
kieran mccarthy to check ORAN preference
kieran mccarthy confirms through email on to use semantic versioning which ORAN follows https://semver.org.
kieran mccarthy if DMI produce additional headers NCMP will discard those i.e. not included in forwarded events
- Add V2 file
- Deprecate V1
- Support both versions for a while
- Delete the V1 version (after some time )
CPS Team Create a V2 of the schema and rename eventContent as event data
. Do it as part of the schema addition.
ForwardedEvent is not wrapped inside Event but question now is if we need 2 events at all?!
Sourabh Sourabh and RAVITEJA KARUMURI (EST) can check how it is actually working and then we decide ( create a JIRA ticket )
Wiki for the Study on NCMPAsyncRequestResponse event schema
Conclusion: events not designed as proposed, very inconsistent. Never go a bug because these async events aren't used at all (confirmed by Csaba Koscis) Instead bulk request wil be used for topology use cases.
kieran mccarthy and team agreed to:
- Temporary disable the legacy async request feature (task created:
)Jira Legacy server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key CPS-1694 - As part of a lower priority work items (but during Montreal) fix related events with learnings from the new batch-usecase. (task created
)Jira Legacy server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key CPS-1693
Priyank Maheshwari wanted to store 'datastore' in this field but kieran mccarthy explained it to use for different purposes
kieran mccarthy Clients can use this field as per their requirements.
# | Description | Notes | Decision | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No Event properties defined for DMI AVC Event | Priyank Maheshwari will need to specify and agreed event structure for DMI AVC Event with stakeholders ie. provide Jira ticket | Event Body should be compatible with RFC8641 kieran mccarthy has confirmed. Priyank Maheshwari created JIRA to create the event body schema. | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Bulk Operation events details have not yet be defined (just headers) | Sourabh Sourabh to provide Jira tickets |
| ||||||||||||||||
3 | Should all the events have same Headers | kieran mccarthy Possibly Common (base) set of headers but mandatory aspect might differ. In practice we might need a separate headers (schema?) for each event | |||||||||||||||||
4 | Clarify the format of the version eventSchemaVersion |
ex: 1.0.0 (without 'v') | kieran mccarthy to check ORAN preference kieran mccarthy confirms through email on to use semantic versioning which ORAN follows https://semver.org. | ||||||||||||||||
5 | What to do with additional event headers (from DMI Plugins) | kieran mccarthy if DMI produce additional headers NCMP will discard those i.e. not included in forwarded events | |||||||||||||||||
6 | Event(Content) field in DMI Async Request Response Event has inconsistent name (compared with other schemas) |
| CPS Team Create a V2 of the schema and rename eventContent as | ||||||||||||||||
7 | NCMP Async Request Response Event (#5) contains both an Event and ForwardedEvent | ForwardedEvent is not wrapped inside Event but question now is if we need 2 events at all?! Sourabh Sourabh and RAVITEJA KARUMURI (EST) can check how it is actually working and then we decide (create a JIRA ticket) Wiki for the Study on NCMPAsyncRequestResponse event schema Conclusion: events not designed as proposed, very inconsistent. Never go a bug because these async events aren't used at all (confirmed by Csaba Koscis) Instead bulk request wil be used for topology use cases. | kieran mccarthy and team agreed to:
| ||||||||||||||||
8 | Dmi Data AVC Event, use of eventSource field | Priyank Maheshwari wanted to store 'datastore' in this field but kieran mccarthy explained it to use for different purposes | kieran mccarthy Clients can use this field as per their requirements. | ||||||||||||||||
9 |
|
...
|
| ||||||||||
10 | Depending #10 can schema inherit/extend a common schema for common headers | Commonly define them and then define what are mandatory(required) or optional as per the schema extending it. If a field is not used in the extended schema then it should be able to handle it. extend the POC (on #9) to cover this. Priyank Maheshwari did the POC and the conclusion of that was that :-
| Toine Siebelink agrees to go ahead with separate schema/headers per event. There will be some duplication but it will have its advantage when versioning. | ||||||||
11 | Is anyone using Async Request feature? | See
| Csaba Kocsis confirmed this is not used by Ericsson currently. No plans to use soon for single-cmhandle requests either (TBC). Need to decide priority (Csaba Kocsis to find out of fiXing the legacy schema(s) | ||||||||
12 | Do we need additionalProperties for DMI ASync Data Request respondes (events #4, #5) | The original code populates a framework defined 'additionalProperties' field with a singel key-value pair: "response-data",{<json data>}. No other (private) properties are added either in DMI PLugin or NCMP code. The name is just coincidence and misleading. In fact this 'additionalProperties' field should NOT have been used at all! | No, the new schema should NOT add 'additionalProperties' field at all use 'additionalProperties:no' in the schema | ||||||||
13 | AVC Subscription Event (DMI → NCMP) (events #3) |
| kieran mccarthy this issue is now no longer relevant as the decision was to use CNCF Cloud Events instead as per decision #14 | ||||||||
14 | Align headers with CNCF Cloud Events | Using standard headers as defined by Cloud Events and possibly common header extension See Table below, CNFC Cloud Event alignment CPS will use Cloud Events 3PP for all current and legacy events to ensure common format | kieran mccarthyand Toine Siebelink agreed on general idea but exact list of common headers need to be agreed
|
Defining header schema.
Integration of header with kafka.
Naming and versioning convention for the header schemas. 'id'
Does the headers schema have a version too?!
Priyank Maheshwari confirmed headers can be described with a separate schema.
Both header schema's and event schemas will be published on https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-cps/en/latest/cps-events.html
Header schema name and version will be maintained in the 'id' metadata field of header's schema .
Commonly define them and then define what are mandatory(required) or optional as per the schema extending it.
If a field is not used in the extended schema then it should be able to handle it.
Extend the POC ( on #9 ) to cover this.
Priyank Maheshwari did the POC and the conclusion of that was that :-
- One schema can extend the other schema.
- We cannot override the mandatory/optional parameter from the Parent schema.
Toine Siebelink agrees to go ahead with separate schema/headers per event. There will be some duplication but it will have its advantage when versioning.
See
Jira Legacy | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Csaba Kocsis confirmed this is not used by Ericsson currently. No plans to use soon for single-cmhandle requests either (TBC). Need to decide priority (Csaba Kocsis to find out of fixing the legacy schema(s)
See decision on issue #7
- Want to understand what 'data' is datatype referring to under Subscription Event?
- What value comes under 'schemaName' & 'SchemaVersion' of Datatype definition under AVC Subscription Event?
- Reconfirmation needed on 'schemaName' & 'SchemaVersion' should be in the payload?
In meeting kieran mccarthy updated #3 is ON HOLD to analyse further.
Agreed with Toine Siebelink on that Priyank Maheshwari will look into this from now as they are working on something related to this.
CPS will use Cloud Events 3PP for all current and legacy events to ensure common format
kieran mccarthyand Toine Siebelink agreed on general idea but exact list of common headers need to be agreed
Jira (first impl.) to be added!
Jira Legacy | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
During the meeting we saw that the Kafka header fields were prefixed with "ce_ " so need to check if we are ok with that.
correlationid
?refer to CNFC doc and add list extension in RTD documentation. (key and value constraints)
Event Overview
...
cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:avc-subscription-event:v1
...
cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:dmi-async-request-response-event-schema:v1
...
cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:ncmp-async-request-response-event-schema:v1
...
...
#1 LCM Event (NCMP → Client Apps)
Description
LCM (Life Cycle Management) Event. Sent by NCMP when the state of a CM Handle changes. For diagram see CM-Handle State Changes and Notifications Overview#Notificationhandlingincode
...
title | LCM Event Details |
---|
Current LCM Event Object
...
Mandatory
E.g. cps:org.onap.ncmp.cmhandle.lcm-event:1.0.0
...
The version of the schema that this event adheres to
...
Mandatory
e.g v1.0
...
standard ( specversion )
Type:Event (cps:org.onap.ncmp.cmhandle.lcm-event:v1)
...
Values that represents the state of a cmHandle
...
Type:Values
...
State of cmHandle
...
["ADVISED", "READY", "LOCKED", "DELETING", "DELETED"]
...
#2 DMI Data AVC Event (ONAP DMI → NCMP)
Description
A normalized AVC Event that ONAP DMI Plugin will send to NCMP. NCMP can process the event and update cached data if needed. See 5 in CPS Data Notifications Overview#ComponentDiagram
Other DMI Plugin might snet similar events, using same headers but different payload and value for 'eventSchema' Depending on the AVC subscription details those events might or might not be forwarded to the Client Apps.
...
title | DMI Data AVC Event |
---|
AVC Event Object
...
The version of the schema that this event adheres to
...
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:avc-event-schema:v1)
...
No Properties defined (entire event treated as single object) See open issue #1
Priyank Maheshwari This is how the event will look like.
#3 AVC Subscription Event (DME → NCMP)
Description
AVC Subscription Event (External Clients Apps → NCMP) : ON HOLD - kieran mccarthy to analyze further
Priyank Maheshwari We need to revisit this schema and include the cloud events fields. ( At the moment this doesn't have proper fields )
...
title | AVC Subscription Event |
---|
Subscription Event Object
...
The event type
...
ekiemcc : This is now covered by the header? Is this needed any longer in the body?
Enum:
["CREATE"]
...
Event Object (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:avc-subscription-event:v1)
...
The datatype content
...
Additional values to be added into the subscription
...
Type: Subscription
...
The client ID
...
The name of the subscription
...
optional parameter, default is false
...
Type: DataType
...
The dataspace name
...
The category type of the data
...
The provider name of the data
...
The name of the schema
...
The version of the schema
...
Type: Predicates
...
CM Handles to be targeted by the subscription
...
datastore which is to be used by the subscription
...
filter to be applied to the CM Handles through this event
...
#4 DMI Async Request Response Event (DMI → NCMP)
Description
...
| |||
15 | During the meeting we saw that the Header fields were prefiXed with "ce_" so we need to check if we are ok with that. | assume "ce_" can be used as all user of the CNCF lib will get this behavior, will check if it can be replaced with no prefix at all. CPS Team recommend to accept this prefix and simply document that this prefer is required when filtering on kafka headers defined by CloudEvenst standard. | team agreed with kieran mccarthy to accept "ce_" prefix on serialzied CE defined headers. |
16 | Do will still need/ can we still use schemas for header details with CNCF library ?! | How to publish info about non-standard headers like correlationid ? | Meeting on Team agreed refer to CNFC doc. and add list of extensions in RTD documentation. (key and value constraints) |
17 | Inconsistent casing convention for header fields v. json data fields | Just observing. All header ion CNCF are lowercase whereas json field are camelCase. Don't want to change but want to make sure agree... | Meeting on Team agreed this is the way it is and Toine Siebelink will update to CPS Style section: Contribution and Development#CommonStyleConventions |
18 | Confirm 'source'. is to be added to ALL events (declared mandatory for CNFC events) | kieran mccarthy confirm is is compulsory and a value will need to be set for all event definition. in NCMP a default value of 'ncmp' can be used if no other source is applicable. Toine Siebelink will update this page were needed to add this field and default value |
Event Overview
# | Short Name | Source | Destination | Impl. Status | Notes | Full Schema Name | Diagram Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LCM Event | NCMP | Client Apps | In Use | Life Cycle Management Events, when cmHandles are added or removed | cps:org.onap.ncmp.cmhandle.lcm-event:v1 | CM-Handle State Changes and Notifications Overview#Notificationhandlingincode |
2 | DMI Data AVC Event | DMI | NCMP | Implemented, Not in use | Attribute Value Change in configuration management (CM) data. | cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:avc-event-schema:v1 | 5 in CPS Data Notifications Overview#ComponentDiagram |
3 | AVC Subscription Create Event | Client | NCMP & DMIs | Implemented, Not in use | Create Event Only | cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:avc-subscription-event:v1 | 7 in CPS Data Notifications Overview#ComponentDiagram |
4 | DMI Async Request Response Event | DMI | NCMP | In Use | DMI passes response onto Kafka topic specified by client. | cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:dmi-async-request-response-event-schema:v1 | 3b → 4a in CPS-821 Spike: Support Async read-write operations on CPS-NCMP interface#ProposedDesign |
5 | NCMP Async Request Response Event | NCMP | Client Apps | In Use | Forward No.4 to client specified topic | cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:ncmp-async-request-response-event-schema:v1 | 4b → 5 in CPS-821 Spike: Support Async read-write operations on CPS-NCMP interface#ProposedDesign |
6 | Bulk Response Event (Internal) | DMI | NCMP | In Progress | Internal Kafka topic | cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.event:dmi-async-bulk-response-event-schema:v1 | 5 in CPS-1515: Spike: Support Multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation (Data operations)#BulkRequestMessageFlow |
7 | NCMP | Client Apps | In Progress | Forwarding the DMI responses to the client topic | cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.event:ncmp-async-bulk-response-event-schema:v1 | 6 in CPS-1515: Spike: Support Multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation (Data operations)#BulkRequestMessageFlow |
#1 LCM Event (NCMP → Client Apps)
Description
LCM (Life Cycle Management) Event. Sent by NCMP when the state of a CM Handle changes. For diagram see CM-Handle State Changes and Notifications Overview#Notificationhandlingincode
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current LCM Event Object
Type:Event (cps:org.onap.ncmp.cmhandle.lcm-event:v1)
Type:Values
|
#2 DMI Data AVC Event (ONAP DMI → NCMP)
Description
A normalized AVC Event that ONAP DMI Plugin will send to NCMP. NCMP can process the event and update cached data if needed. See 5 in CPS Data Notifications Overview#ComponentDiagram
Other DMI Plugin might snet similar events, using same headers but different payload and value for 'eventSchema' Depending on the AVC subscription details those events might or might not be forwarded to the Client Apps.
Expand | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AVC Event Object
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:avc-event-schema:v1)
|
#3 AVC Subscription Event (DME → NCMP)
Description
AVC Subscription Event (external Clients Apps → NCMP)
Priyank Maheshwari We need to revisit this schema and include the cloud events fields. (At the moment this doesn't have proper fields)
Excerpt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
#4 DMI Async Request Response Event (DMI → NCMP)
Description
This event is for the asynchronous responses from DMI to NCMP following (synchronous) requests (from NCMP) specifying a (response) topic. See 3b → 4a in CPS-821 Spike: Support Async read-write operations on CPS-NCMP interface#ProposedDesign
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DmiAsyncRequestResponse Event Object
Type: EventContent (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:dmi-async-request-response-event-schema:v1)
|
#5 NCMP Async Request Response Event (NCMP → Client App)
Description
This event is for the asynchronous responses from NCMP to Client Apps following (synchronous) requests (from client) specifying a (response) topic. See 4b → 5 in CPS-821 Spike: Support Async read-write operations on CPS-NCMP interface#ProposedDesign
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DmiAsyncRequestResponseNcmpAsyncRequestResponse Event ObjectField | Type | Description | Kafka Header | Event Payload
Notes | CloudEvents Mapping | eventID | string | The unique id identifying the event generated by DMI | x | standard ( id ) | eventCorrelationId | string | The request id passed by NCMP x | extensions ( correlationid ) | eventTime | string | The timestamp when original event occurred | x | standard ( time) | eventTarget | string | The target of the event | x | extensions ( target) | eventType | string | The type of the event | x | standard ( type ) | eventSchema | string | The event schema for async request response events x | standard ( dataschema ) |
eventSource | string | The source of the event | x | standard ( source ) | eventContent | EventContent | The payload of an event | The name of this fields is inconsistent with all other event schemas, see issue #6 standard ( data ) | Type: EventContent (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:dmi-async-request-response-event-schema:v1) | |||||||||
Field | Type | Description | Kafka Header | Event Payload Field | Notes | repsonse-data-schema | string | The schema of response data | x | response-status | string | The status of the response | x | response-code | string | The code of the response | x | response-data | object | The data payload | x | contains payload of type object |
#5 NCMP Async Request Response Event (NCMP → Client App)
Description
This event is for the asynchronous responses from NCMP to Client Apps following (synchronous) requests (from client) specifying a (response) topic. See 4b → 5 in CPS-821 Spike: Support Async read-write operations on CPS-NCMP interface#ProposedDesign
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NcmpAsyncRequestResponse Event Object Field | Type | Description | Kafka Header | Event Payload Field | Notes | CloudEvents Mapping | eventID | string | The unique id identifying the event generated by DMI | x | standard ( id )
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:ncmp-async-request-response-event-schema:v1)
x | extensions ( correlationid )
x | standard ( time)
x | extensions ( target)
x | standard ( type )
x | standard ( dataschema ) | eventSchemaVersion
x | event | Event | The payload of an event | Defined by event object below | standard ( source ) | forwardedEvent | ForwardedEvent | The payload of a forwarded event | Relation to Event field unclear, do we need 2 events at all see issue #7 standard ( data ) |
Type: forwardedEvent (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:ncmp-async-request-response-event-schema:v1)
Type: forwardedEvent (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:ncmp-async-request-response-event-schema:v1)
Proposed New Schema:see
Jira Legacy | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
server | System Jira | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
serverId | 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 | key | CPS-1660
Field | Type | Description | Header | Payload | Notes | CloudEvents Mapping |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eventID | string | The unique id identifying the event generated by DMI | X | standard (id ) | ||
eventCorrelationId | string | The request id passed by NCMP | X | extensions(correlationid ) | ||
eventTime | string | The timestamp when original event occurred | X | standard (time ) | ||
eventSource | string | The source of the event | X |
The received schema of response data
What value should contain in this? Needs clarification, see issue #8 | standard (source ) | |
eventType | string | The |
type of the |
event | X | standard (type ) | ||
eventSchema | string | The |
The data payload
event schema for async request response events | X | standard (dataschema ) | ||||
| X | dataschema ' | ||||
event | Event | The payload of an event | X | Defined by event object below | standard (data ) |
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:ncmp-async-request-response-event-schema:v1)
Field | Type | Description |
---|
Header |
---|
Payload |
---|
Notes | ||
---|---|---|
eventCorrelationId | string | The request id passed by NCMP |
X | as above @Toine asked to add this property. | ||
responseStatus | string | The |
received status of the response | X | ||
responseCode | string | The |
received code of the |
The event schema for async request response events
The event schema version for async request response events
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events:ncmp-async-request-response-event-schema:v1)
response | X | ||||
responseData | object | The data payload | X | contains payload of type object |
#6 Data Operation (response) Event (DMI → NCMP)
Description
Batch (data) request will always result in asynchronous events (responses) sent to the client. This event is the response from DMI to NCMP. See 5 in CPS-1515: Spike: Support Multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation (bulk / batch operations)#BulkRequestMessageFlow
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DmiDataOperationEvent Object
| as above @Toine asked to add this property. | responseStatus
|
|
The data payload
#6 Batch Response Event (DMI → NCMP)
Description
Batch (data) request will always result in asynchronous events (responses) sent to the client. This event is the response from DMI to NCMP. See 5 in CPS-1515: Spike: Support Multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation (bulk / batch operations)#BulkRequestMessageFlow
...
title | DMI Async Batch Response Event |
---|
BatchResponseEvent Object
...
Mandatory
...
The request id passed by NCMP
...
Optional. The timestamp should follow that on https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339#section-5. This follows ISO 8601 and is what is used/referenced in 3GPP standards
Example: 1985-04-12T23:20:50.52Z this represents 20 minutes and 50.52 seconds after the 23rd hour of April 12th, 1985 in UTC.
...
The event schema for async request response events
...
The event schema version for async request response events
...
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.event.async:dmi-async-batch-response-event-schema:v1)
...
#7 Batch Response Event (NCMP → Client App)
Description
Batch (data) request will always result in asynchronous events (responses) sent to the client. This event is the response from DMI to NCMP. See 6 in CPS-1515: Spike: Support Multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation (bulk / batch operations)#BulkRequestMessageFlow
...
title | NCMP Async Batch Response Event - Client Topic |
---|
BatchResponseEvent Object
...
The request id passed by NCMP
...
The event schema for async request response events
...
The event schema version for async request response events
...
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.event.async:ncmp-async-batch-response-event-schema:v1)
...
CNCF Cloud Event alignment
Introduction
CNCF CloudEvents is a specification for describing event data in common formats to provide interoperability across services, platforms and systems.
- These cloud events will be applied to all the internal and external events we have in CPS , NCMP and DMI Plugin.
- Cloud events will be taking care of the fields which are part of kafka headers or part of the actual payload ( fields other than "data" are sent as kafka headers )
- These CNCF cloud events will be applied to all the events listed in above sections ( LCM , DMI Data AVC etc. )
Library References
- https://github.com/cloudevents/sdk-java
- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.cloudevents
- Examples : https://github.com/cloudevents/sdk-java/tree/main/examples/kafka/src/main/java/io/cloudevents/examples/kafka
Common Header Mapping
The table below shows how previously proposed headers should be mapped to pre-defined CNFC headers.
...
Before
...
After
...
eventId
...
id
...
eventSource
...
source
...
N/A
...
specversion (default 1.0)
...
eventType
...
type
...
eventTime
...
time
...
eventSchema
...
dataschema
...
Optional includes the version of the schema
...
withDataContentType()
...
Optional This will be part of the extensions field in the cloud events and all the restrictions of the attribute field naming applies to it.
i.e these fields will be in the small case.
This is marked as optional as it only applies to some events.
...
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.event.async:dmi-data-operation-event-schema:v1)
|
#7 Data Operation (response) Event (NCMP → Client App)
Description
Batch (data) request will always result in asynchronous events (responses) sent to the client. This event is the response from DMI to NCMP. See 6 in CPS-1515: Spike: Support Multiple CM-Handles for NCMP Get Operation (bulk / batch operations)#BulkRequestMessageFlow
Expand | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NcmpDataOperationEvent Object
Type: Event (cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.event.async:ncmp-data-operation-event-schema:v1)
|
CNCF Cloud Event alignment
Introduction
CNCF CloudEvents is a specification for describing event data in common formats to provide interoperability across services, platforms and systems.
- These cloud events will be applied to all the internal and external events we have in CPS , NCMP and DMI Plugin.
- Cloud events will be taking care of the fields which are part of Headers or part of the actual payload (fields other than "data" are sent as Headers)
- These CNCF cloud events will be applied to all the events listed in above sections (LCM , DMI Data AVC etc.)
Library References
- https://github.com/cloudevents/sdk-java
- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.cloudevents
- examples : https://github.com/cloudevents/sdk-java/tree/main/Examples/kafka/src/main/java/io/cloudevents/Examples/kafka
Common Header Mapping
The table below shows how previously proposed headers should be mapped to pre-defined CNFC headers.
Before | After1 | CloudeEvent builder method | Example Value | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
eventId | (ce_)id | .withId() | Mandatory | |
eventSource | (ce_)source | .withSource() | Mandatory | |
N/A | (ce_)specversion (default 1.0) | .v1() | 1.0 | Mandatory - This is the version of the cloud events |
eventType | (ce_)type | .withType() | Mandatory | |
eventTime | (ce_)time | .withTime() | Optional (could be Mandatory for | |
eventSchema | (ce_)dataschema | .withDataSchema() | Optional includes the version of the schema | |
content-type2 | withDataContentType() | application/json | Optional | |
eventCorrelationId | (ce_)correlationid | .withExtension() | Optional This will be part of the extensions field in the cloud events and all the restrictions of the attribute field naming applies to it. i.e these fields will be in the small case. This is marked as optional as it only applies to some events. | |
event | (ce_)data | .withData(json TBC) | Mandatory actual event/payload now would be under "data" field. |
- Note 1 all cloud-event headers will be prefixed during serialization with 'ce_' (this means when filtering on serialized Kafka-headers this prefix need to be applied)
- Note 2 content-type is a a 'default' header name no 'wrapped' by CloudEvents and hence the inconsistency in names and that is does NOT have the 'ce_' prefix.
Common NCMP response staus code & message :
- Status-code 0-99 is reserved for any success response
- Status-code from 100 to 199 is reserved for any failed response.
Status Code | Status Message |
---|---|
0 | Successfully applied changes |
100 | cm handle id(s) is(are) not found |
101 | cm handle id(s) is(are) in non ready state |
102 | dmi plugin service is not responding |
103 | dmi plugin service is not able to read resource data |