Page Comparison

28 Nov 2022 

Ahila P arne.chrestin Lena Peuker Toine Siebelink Andras Zoltan Kiss Joe K Levente Csanyi Luke Gleeson (Unlicensed) Seán Beirne Tony Finnerty 

• Ahila P demonstrated her current solution based on storing prefix (module-name) upfront i.e as part of data in fragment table.
• Pros
  • seems to work for all output use-cases including edge cases such as leaves etc.
  • module name prefix gets inserted in the first level of the output which might not be the top level element in a module. 
  • compatible with SDNC behavior (arne.chrestin confirmed too)
• Cons
  • Client needs to specify prefix when using xPath requests
  • Backward incompatible
  • cpsPath (search) capabilities broken
  • Impacts on performance (unclear)
  • modulename prefix not per Yang RFX(see decision #5) above (TBC)
• Actions
  • Toine Siebelink to check prefix v. modulename RFC guideline
  • Ahila P store 'xPath-with-prefixes' in a  new field in fragment table  to maintain backward compatibility
  • Ahila P break down required functionality in smaller user stories including
    • make xPath queries check both possible paths (with and with prefixes) if needed
    • use of prefixes with cpsPatrh functionality 
    • performance impact of new solution