...
The following items are expected to be completed for the project to Pass the M2 Functionality Freeze Milestone.
M2 Release Functionality Freeze Milestone definition.
| Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
|
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidence - Comment | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Are all provisional APIs interface (stub) been defined (at beta-quality level)? | Yes | API Guide | APIs needed for support of vCPE and regression of vFW are available; Additional APIs will be contributed in Sprint 2, but no one has dependencies on these and API Guide will be updated accordingly. Currently details can be found here: APPC_OAM_Overview - ONAP.pdf |
| Is there a final list of externally consumable APIs available? | Yes | API Guide | What is needed to support vCPE use case and regression of vFW use case, which is what APPC committed for R1, are available. | |
For all completed Sprints, have Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | APPC Project backlog | Difference between a Product and Sprint Backlog First sprint kicked off on 8/1, however some items were completed outside of sprint and are correctly marked in Jira. | |
Are all tasks associated with the completed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | First sprint kicked off on 8/1, however some items were completed outside of sprint and are correctly marked in Jira. | ||
| If applicable to your project, has your team been able to clear the project' blockers? If not provide status on the plan to close the blocker(s). |
Yes |
9/10/17: ODL provided by CCSDK.
9/10/17: Integration testing planning in progress | ||
| Release Management | Have all source code files been updated with License Apache 2 header? | Yes | Specific rules and instruction are available in ONAP wiki. | |
| Has the year format in copyright header of all source code files been updated? (Rules for new files created in 2017 and existing files modified in 2017 are different) | Yes | This was done for ONAP Launch | ||
| In case source code can't be edited, has a "License.txt" file been placed at the root directory for which the license is applicable? | Yes | Guidance for source code file that can't be edited | ||
| Has the project FOSS Table been updated with latest third party code? | Yes | Provide link to evidence | Your project FOSS table is located under Project FOSS master page | |
| Do you have a plan to address any issue raised by Fossology? | N/A | If any issues arise with Fossology, they will be addressed | ||
Have all API projects dependencies been captured? | Yes | Provide link to the "API Incoming Dependency" section within your project M1 Release Planning deliverable. | The source of information for the API dependency is the "API Incoming Dependency" of the M1 Release Planning deliverable. Please update the source accordingly, and let The Release Manager aware of the changes. | |
| Development | For new projects approved for this release, have all defined repositories source code been placed into Gerrit? | N/A |
No new repo | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | ||
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Work in progress | Goal: 30-50% for Incubation project | Guidance on Code Coverage and Static Code Analysis Note that trouble tickets was submitted to LF Helpdesk because Sonar is inconsistent in reporting Unit Test/Code Coverage. |
| Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | No | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | |
| Could you ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, company name, etc. have been removed? All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols. | No | As discussed between AT&T Legal & LF council, the removal of trademark and company name is not applicable to AT&T. | |
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 business hours in Gerrit? | No | ||
| Have all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | APPC Jenkins | |
| Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | APPC Snapshots | https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ |
| Integration and Testing | Have functional test cases been documented in wiki? |
| Yes | APPC Functional Test Cases | |
| Have you implemented in Jenkins at least 1 functional test case for each of the project repository? |
| Yes | As an evidence, provide a link to Jenkins (CSIT Jobs) that shows a sample test case implemented (1 job for each repo). | As an example (provided by Integration Team) | ||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Build process? | Yes | Goal is to ensure your project latest commits have not broken the build. | ||
| Documentation | Has the team identified and outlined the set of documentations to be delivered in this Release? | Yes | Documentation Epic |