Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attending

Eric Debeau Andreas Geißler Thomas Kulik Ken KANISHIMA Sofia Wallin Timo Perala Andrea Visnyei Sofia Wallin Ken KANISHIMA Ramakrishna GP

Topics, Notes, Status and Follow-Up Tasks

...

TopicNotes / Status / Follow-up
  •  Upcoming milestones and release planning for docs

Tasks reading up to RC2/Sign-off (19/11) Note: Wait for new date to be confirmed Release date/sign-off December 3rd 

Reviews:

Status on reviews? Guilin Documentation 

To be continued. 

Templates:

Projects not using the new release notes template: create a Jira ticket asking the project to update their template. If not for Guilin Release then can move it to Honolulu. 

Jira:

Walkthrough of remaining Jira tickets. 4 tickets remaining. All assigned except one related to architecture documentation. To be solved with Catherine how to proceed. Reminder to everyone to fill in the tracking page

Branching:

Potential problem: when projects creates a guilin branch for their documentation a build is not triggered. An actual change needs to be started on order for the documentation to build. 

Would an automated Jenkins trigger be possible? To be discussed for future releases. For the Guilin Release this will be done manually on a regular basisCurrent status: Issues since not all projects have branched yet. The team are supporting projects and reviewing RTD to ensure we are on track. 

Many broken links appears, tool available for checking this. Eric suggest to run a test right after the release to start working on fixing this. Also to check with Jessica and Aric if this could be implemented with the build

  •  Architecture documentation 

Status on the architecture documentation 

The landing page created by the architecture team is still being used after decision in the TSC that this should be removed. What to do? Sofia Wallinto reach out to Catherine. 

Why do the template refer to Gerrit?

Example: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=doc.git;a=blob;f=docs/templates/sections/release-notes.rst

 

Email sent to Catherine 20/11

Need to clarify with Chaker contents included in the "Navigator" => I propose to add interactive figure in RTD.

Eric is working with Chaker to update all figurs for Guilin

Issues with stable branch creating in RTD. 

New feature added by RTD which is causing issues. Jessica Gonzalezis aware of the issue and will investigate further. 

Conversation with Jessica:

Hi Thomas Kulik. The issue was due to the feature 2020-resolver that readthedocs was randomly testing on some of the ONAP projects. I was able to reach out to them to disable it in all onap projects. However, they mentioned that the new feature will be enabled by default sometime Nov. Hopefully the new feature won't break our builds. Check out my conversation with them in: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/projects/IT/queues/custom/17/IT-21014

Bring discussion to the PTL call early Honolulu release cycle.  

David McBride will join to discuss this further. 

Active projects vs maintenance projects. 

Problem statement:

The conf.py with the intersphinx mapping has different settings/configurations. Some projects refer to the latest branch and some stable/Frankfurt. 

After migrating we did see that some projects refers to latest even when choosing Frankfurt on RTD. Could this be because of the configuration or is the configuration based on whether the projects have created a release branch or not?

Sofia Wallin  From what I learned from Aric, we do not need to change the branch in each repo whenever a project creates their branch. The branch= foo in the conf.py only applies to the default rtd theme, it doesn't do anything for the theme ONAP is using. 

All projects need to have build the stable branch before we can switch the main doc to be the next release branch. 

  •  Update "Documentation improvements for end to end usage of ONAP"

@Aarna Networks

How to handle pending patches? There are currently 7 and 4 of them are in the doc repo

Select and compile links from RTD

Eric Debeau and Andreas Geißler to look at this and make an assessment for further work

Eric Debeau presented local documentation testing. We will document a basic for version for local RST rendering. Further extensions will be available if needed/wanted (such as spell checker + Linter) but this requires a more extensive set of tools. To be presented in the PTL call for feedback.

 ************************************************************************************

Local environment to write RST files and detect

Visual Studio Code IDE + Extensions (Spell Checker + Linter)

Automatic preview aligned with ONAP documentation schemes

Status Notes: Eric has all information and will put it to Wiki, when he finds the proposed location

Sofia Wallin to create a wiki page and send to Eric

DOC Local environment to write and test RST files

Eric requests the team to try the instruction before brining bringing it to the community.

Many links ara managed in RTD

  • local links within a repo
  • inter-project links using inter-links from sphinx
  • links to code repo
  • external links to web sites

There is a problem when a documentation linkes to a repo => the branc is not indicated. As result, the link points to the latest release

Propostion to provide guidelines to be then presented for PTL


Many links are broken => need to include a test in JJB and provide information about broken links

Feedback has been given, positive output. Next step, bring to PTL 

Sill required from the project to test