Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

 | 9am PST |  noon EST | 17:00 UTC | 18:00 CET | 21:30 IST |

Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/436210993

Attendees


Informed

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
00:00Admin

Next meetings: 

2020-11-18 Martin Skorupski

2020-11-25: Martin Skorupski

2020-12-02John Keeney (Ericsson EST)

2020-12-08: Martin Skorupski

2020-12-15: ???

00:05O-RAN-SCO-RAN-SC PTLs

Status reports:

  • SMO:
  • Non-RT-RIC:
    • ?
  • SIM:
    • ?
  • OAM:
    • Preparation for demo videos
00:16
    • focus - R3 (Cherry) - code freeze - documentation in ONAP ongoing ...
    • http proxy and rest config the function 
      • Non-RT-RIC - bundle function into the same controller as OAM as deployment option
    • ONAP pull to O-RAN-SC (code is hosted in ONAP)
    • Deployment based on OOM
    • policy enrichment functions
    • end-to-end testing
      • heath check
      • Traffic steering
  • SIM:
  • OAM:
    • documentation!!! (dont forget (wink)
    • Preparation for demo videos for C-Release
      • Basic Fault 
        • VES for O1
        • NetConf notification for O-RAN Fronthaul
      • Basic PM
        • VES file ready from O1-Sim
        • FTPes to O1-Sim
        • PM-mapper
        • using a REST client for VES-PM on DMaaP
      • Basic Config
        • alarm-list
        • inventory
        • visualization and modification of O-RAN-FH parameters
00:22Use Case
00:3725
@Mahesh

Application Package Structure

  • TOSCA 

Info from Michela Bevilacqua

  • ONAP enhanced TOSCA 
  • API schema definition for YANG and VES

On the agenda for next week - thanks!!! (wink)

Zu Qiang presenting ONAP on-boarding package


--

CNF packaging and App packaging - seems there is some overlap?!?!?

00:5530


Questions and Answers

  • data model - from Bitbucket DM with 3GPP and O-RAN (draft - November train)
  • closed loop use case with A1 and O1 
      O1 preparation on O-DU → code review 
        • E2 sim functions may needed

      Use Case 

        • O-RAN-FH node (VES triggers O1 change)
          • VES-fault-event
          • you see it on DMaaP
          • fault to DMaaP
          • SMO app via OAM config change (see POSTMAN scripts)
        • O1 - Near-RT-RIC  (VES triggers A1 change)
          • VES-fault-event
          • you see it on DMaaP
          • Non-RT-RIC rApp reads from DMaaP
          • update A1 policy in Near-RT-RIC/xApp


      APP package implementation

      • once the package spec is available - what would be the next steps?

    END


    Backup




    00:10
    Mahesh

    Postman scripts to interface with the SMO and in turn test O1 interface between the SMO and different parts of O-RAN instances of O-CU, O-DU, O-RU and RIC using these models. 

    • yang modules
    • framework for test and validate CM 

    share content in in SMO gerrit and create wiki linking to the same source

    • Working on a framework for vendors for OAM/YANG tests
    • O-RAN-SC to host the framework
    • Postman and vsCode as RestClients
    • Alex about to setup a SIM in OSC lab - involve Rittwik in a O-RAN private lab
    • OpenFronthaul
    • 3GPP models are considered.

    Feedback from Rittwik

    • SMO in T-Labs
    • how to run Netopeer server - req to Felix (O-RAN-SC INT PTL)
    • Alex asked for VMs 

    Init script (Postman) for O-RAN OAM FH M-Plane (o-ran-interface.yang augmenting ) interface demoed

    RFC8040 (RestConf by IETF) support supported by ODL

    00:25

    Konrad is absent this week. The presentation will be made when Konrad is available.

    O-RAN Component deployment

    The question is: How to deploy the red colored CNFs/VNFs of the O-RAN-Architecture?

    • CNF for O-RAN-components 
      • model of CNF - how to be configured, how many components, blueprints
      • CDS model needs to be created
      • Network-service based on several CNFs
        • CNF types
          • Near-RT-RIC
          • O-CU-UP
          • O-CU-CP
          • O-DU

    For detailed discussion the following page was created:


    Package

    • for Network Functions (priority)
    • for Network Service (second step)

    CNFs or VNFs

    • both should be considered 
      • let's start with CNFs first
      • VNF is considered as additional option


    • no CNFs and VNFs combined in a single package
      • maybe not for rApps → 
      • VNF should take care about internal CNFs


    Action items

    •