Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

This page captures a draft of the recommendations of the working group on the project maturity reviews in July 2020.

Guidelines used by the working group (above and beyond criteria in the technical community document):

  • Committer diversity - prefer 3 or more companies represented; if only 2, then need diversity in companies contributing
  • S3P requirements not considered as gating for "mature" phase
  • "Mature" phase criteria are more about projects being "active" 


Presentation shared at  TSC meeting.  

View file
nameONAP Proj Maturity Review 23July2020.pptx
height150

Recordings of the working group meetings: 

maturity_rvw_working_group_20200721.mp4

maturity_rvw_working_group_20200722.mp4

maturity_rvw_working_group_20200812.mp4


Project Name

Recommended Disposition

on moving from incubation to mature

(approve, decline,

defer

revert)

Comments

(for approve: improvements that could be made,

for decline: steps needed to get to approve,

for

defer

revert: information needed for recommendation)

AAIapprove

recommend improving committer diversity where possible

4/16/2021 The sub project ESR is now unmaintained - Project State: Unmaintained

CCSDKapprovecontinue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc.

CLAMP

decline

strong project, but need to improve company diversity in both committers and contributors

4/16/2021 The functionalities of this project are now merged with the Policy project -

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
keyREQ-684

CLIdeclineneed participation in the most recent release; need to document architecture review
DCAEapprovecontinue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc.
DMaaPapproverecommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review
External API Frameworkapprove

improve wiki documentation on release content; continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc.


Holmesdeclineneed participation in the most recent release; need to increase contributor and committer diversity; need recent architecture review
Modelingapprove
MSBrevertplease add information on contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of MSB by operators or others
MultiCloudrevert  approve (updated Aug 12, 2020)please add information on contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of MultiCloud by operators or others
ONAP Portaldecline

need to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee; please add information on deployment/use of ONAP Portal by operators or others

4/16/2021 The Portal project is now unmaintained - Project State: Unmaintained

OOFapproverecommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review for any components not already reviewed (CMSO?)
Policy Frameworkapprove
SDCapproveconduct a more current architecture review with a focus on overlap of DCAE-D with DCAE-MOD.
SDNCrevert  approve (updated Aug 12, 2020)please update the wiki page with the new committers, add information on test coverage and contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of SDNC by operators or others
SOapproveplease add information on test coverage; please add information on deployment/use of SO by operators or others
Usecase UIapproverecommend improving committer diversity where possible
VFCrevert  approve (updated Aug 12, 2020)recommendation for future is to avoid bulk commits and & focus on steady contributions and commits.  please address all questions in the comments; also ensure that all committers are active
VNFSDKrevertplease document the review with the architecture subcommittee; please ensure that all committers are active
VVPdeclineneed to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee;