...
- Logging Frankfurt Scope
- Draft Frankfurt spec ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.3 (Frankfurt)
- What is the difference between the rows that are in green vs yellow? Green represents required field where as yellow represents optional field. Prudence to add a legend to the table
- Can we remove the following columns in the spec? It was agreed to remove the following columns from the table.
- Applicable (per log file)
- Marker Associations
- Moved MDC to standard attribute
- Removed (was in the older spec)
- Derived
- Historical
- Acumos ref
- Use Cases
- Would like to add a new column named Notes to note the changes from the Casablanca specspec Agreed by all
- Do we need to update RequestID to TransactionID as per LOG-232 (discussed back in 20180426)? Keep it as "RequestID" and close LOG-232
- Dave Williamson , was the discussion on August 6 - 14, 2018 regarding "Message", "Thread ID" and "Logger Name/class name" completed? See Dave's comment below and this is considered complete.
- Dave Williamson Is the description of InstanceID already updated with the discussion on August 7, 2018? Action: Prudence to update the description
Updated to:
An unique ID to differentiate between multiple instances of the same (named) log writing service/application. For example, either the Kubernetes pod ID or UUID can be used for this field. - Is there any components still write log to /var/log/ONAP_EELF?
- ---------------------------------------------------------
The following items will be moved to the next meeting: - We owe Steve Smokowski an answer for his question on August 30, 2018 (Response Code and Response Description) and September 4, 2018 (Invoke and Invoke-return).
- What is needed for Michael's TODO on November 21, 2018 regarding X-FromAppId?
- Still need to address the issue with 2 test environments and only 1 log instance? Dave Williamson reported it on December 6, 2018
- The description for p_message should be updated to "standard attribute - defined in logback.xml - Message - used for %msg%" as suggested by Lorraine A. Welch on July 3, 2019?
- Removing "VirtualServerName" as mentioned by Dave Williamsonon July 23, 2019?
- Still need a description for ServiceInstanceID, any taker?
- Any feedback on Kevin Smokowski's comment on August 6, 2019 regarding the use of User-Agent as PartnerName?
- Any feedback on Kevin Smokowski's comment on August 5, 2019 regarding the value of ServerIPAddress in the case of docker & kubernetes deployment?
- Any updates needed for TargetEntity and PartnerName? Mentioned on August 15, 2019 (a conversation between Dave and Kevin)
- Any feedback on composite RequestID or NOT composite RequestID (from October 2, 2019)?
Attendees
- Dave Williamson
- Luke Parker
- Sanjay Agraharam
- Prudence Au
Notes
- Next meeting October 2922, 2019