Draft
The following items are expected to be completed for the project to Pass the M3 API Freeze Milestone.
M3 Release Architecture Milestone overview is available in wiki.
...
title | Usage |
---|
...
...
...
Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Security | Has the Release Security/Vulnerability table been updated in the protected Security Vulnerabilities wiki space? | Yes | Table in in the protected Security Vulnerabilities wiki space corresponds to the latest NexusIQ scan | PTL reviews the NexusIQ scans for their project repos and fills out the vulnerability review table |
Has the project committed to enabling transport level encryption on all interfaces and the option to turn it off? | Partial | Requirements and test cases for transport layer encryption have been created for all interfaces not currently supporting encryption. DMaaP MR and BC expose HTTP ports DMaaP DR needs more investigation. | ||
Has the project documented all open port information? | Yes | Update OOM NodePort List | ||
Has the project provided the communication policy to OOM and Integration? | Yes | Recommended Protocols | ||
Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical and High vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? | Yes |
| ||
Architecture | Has the Project team reviewed the APIs with the Architecture Committee (ARC)? | Yes | DMaaP Dublin M3 Architecture Review | Architecture walk through to understand how each project contributes on Release Use Case. ARC to organize the walk through. |
Is there a plan to address the findings the API review? | N/A | Link to plan | The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the implementation of findings or a documented plan within the wiki. | |
Does the team clearly understand that no changes in the API definition is allowed without formal TSC review and approval? | Yes | In the case some changes are necessary, bring the request to the TSC for review and approval. | ||
Is there any changes in the scope, functionalities, deliverable, dependency, resources, API, repositories since M1 milestone? | No | If Yes, please a link to the evidence of these changes. | Critical point to understand is that change is inevitable, and that right timing and clear communication to the community will ease the process of accepting changes. | |
Provide link to the API Documentation. | ||||
Release Management | Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira board? |
Yes | https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=51&projectKey=DMAAP&view=planning.nodetail | |||
Are all tasks associated with Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira? | Yes | |||
Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | N/A | Provide link to JIRA findings | ||
Development | Is there any pending commit request older than 36 Business hours in Gerrit? | Yes | working with the developer of the commit on one commit if its acceptable | Gerrit Query: status:open label:verified -is:draft -label:Code-Review=-1 AND -label:Code-Review=-2 AND is:mergeable age:1week |
Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Partial | Goal: 55% for Incubation project in the current release Couple projects are close but not at the 55% mark. Efforts in progress to get to 55% on those. | Guidance on Code Coverage and Static Code Analysis Tools: Sonar | |
Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed ( Merge-Jobs)? |
Yes | https://nexus.onap.org/#nexus-search;quick~dmaap | ||
Integration and Testing | Have 50% of System Integration Testing Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? It should include at least 1 CSIT that will be run on Lab-xxx-OOM-Daily Jenkins Job |
Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/job/dmaap-master-csit-mrpubsub/ | |||
Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/dmaap/ | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build | |
Has the project passed the Integration Sanity Tests? | Yes | Integration sanity tests in Dublin Release cover:
No test failure reported on http://onapci.org/grafana/d/8cGRqBOmz/daily-summary?orgId=1 No Integration Blocking Issue with no workaround: Dublin Release Integration Test Blocking Issues | ||
Modeling | Has the Project team provided links to Data Models (e.g, JSON, YANG, Swagger, etc.) for all Shared Information (e.g., APIs, API Payload, Shared Design Model)? | No | waiting on modeling team. | It is a non-blocking item for M3 - The Modeling team is gathering information |