Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Xu Yang

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Xu Yang

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Agenda:

  • Backlog
  • PNFD update
  • Comparison with latest IFA011
  • New requirement for the VNFD
  • Root classes

Material:

Minutes:

  • Backlog:
  • PNFD update:
    • swVersionList's cardinality should be 1 instead of 1..N, because the data type supports describing multiple versions already
    • the use case (expected behaviour for handling these attributes) is still requested to be provided
    • suggest the extensions to the existing SDO specs to be marked (Kevin suggest to have a stereotype for this)
    • suggest to align the attribute names in VNFD/PNFD to have the same understanding, e.g., make the "version"/"softwareVersion" attributes have the same name.
      • this is related to the root class proposal
    • with no consensus on the "swVersionList", it's suggested not to put in R4
    • the other attributes/data types would be asked for agreement in subcommittee call
  • Comparison with IFA011:
    • the page is updated with 3 different colors: red - changes needed in R4 to align with IFA011 v2.5.1; blue - candidates for feedback to ETSI spec; purple - HPA attributes/data types to be deprecated
    • recommend people to review the page and give comments
    • discuss next week about the contribution plan for Feb ETSI F2F meeting
      • call for volunteers
  • Requirement for VNFD
    • no comments online
    • have 1 week's time for review
  • Root class draft
    • still under working
    • RootEntity→Descriptor/Entity
    • BusinessInteraction→ServiceOrder/...
    • Do we need to have a single root? Kevin prefer to root classes for those which make sense. (TMF way)
    • suggest ETSI to have root classes defined