Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

This template must be filled out for every Release Candidate Milestone (RC0, 1, 2, x)

RC Release Candidate Milestone overview is available in wiki.


Info
titleUsage
  1. Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
  2. Fill out the Yes/No column
  3. Provide link to evidence (when necessary)
Practice AreaCheckpointYes/NoEvidencesHow to?
Product ManagementAre all tasks associated with the release been marked as "Done" in Jira?noTwo HPA tasks which were in progress are not done due to late publication of the models. They will be included in an interim release.

Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed?yesNo previous JIRA findings
DevelopmentHave all Defects of priority Highest and High been in status "Done" in Jira?yeshttp://project = VNFSDK AND type = Bug and priority in (High,Highest) and status != Done
Are all JIRA issues used as a reference in a commit in status "Done" in Jira?noVNFSDK-246267 and VNFSDK-260 have been referenced in a commit, but are not closed because the fixes are under review. VNFSDK-246 is waiting on resolution of Ticket 54851, and VNFSDK-260 is waiting on final review-268 are still open. They are both awaiting final review. We expect them to close by 5/16.Very often, some JIRA issue remains in status "Todo" in JIRA while the commit they are referenced to is successful.
Is there any pending commit related to Highest and High priority issues older than 36 hours in Gerrit? In case there are messages going back and forth between authors and reviewers, it is acceptable to be above 36 hours.yeshttps://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/41595/. Merge postponed until Casablanca release, since this introduces new API changes after the code freeze.no

Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (verify + merge jobs)?yeshttps://jenkins.onap.org/view/vnfsdk/job/vnfsdk-refrepo-master-merge-java/

Has the team delivered all their release artifacts in Nexus Release or Nexus Staging repo?

There should be at least ONE version of each artifacts available in Nexus Release or Nexus Staging repo.

yeshttps://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/staging/org/onap/vnfsdk/Refer to Independent Versioning and Release Process for procedure
Integration and TestingHave all CSIT Use Cases (created by each project team) passed?yeshttps://jenkins.onap.org/view/CSIT/
Is there a Docker images available for each repository?yeshttps://nexus3.onap.org/#browse/search=keyword%3Dvnfsdk
Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process?yes


Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build 
Has the OOM deployment passed?WIPAwaiting reviews on 44985 and 45329yesHealth Check passing
Has the Heat deployment passed?yesEnsure in Jenkins External Labs all Health Check pass.
Documentation

For RC0, for project delivering binaries, has the team populated and validated all the sections of either the Platform Component or SDK template?


yes

See http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/amsterdam/submodules/vnfsdk/model.git/docs/index.html


Note that VNFSDK fits neither the Platform nor the SDK templates. We have filled out the relevant sections.

Most teams have already created the high level file structures in readthedocs, and populated some actual documentation. However, the remaining sections of the appropriate teamplate must be completed.

Platform: A&AI, APP-C, CLAMP, CLI, DCAE, DMaaP, Holmes, MSB, OOM, Policy, Portal, SDN-C SDC, SO, UseCase UI, VFC, VID

SDKs: AAF, CCSDK, External API Framework, Multi VIM/Cloud, VNFSDK

For RC1, has the team addressed any issue (recorded in JIRA) provided by the Documentation team?

N/ANo JIRA tickets from Documentation team

For RC2, for project delivering binaries, has the team populated and validated all the sections of the Release Notestemplate?

yes

For RC2, has the Documentation Team provided the final approval for your project documentation?TBD