Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user David McBride

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Kenny Paul

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Agenda

START RECORDING

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested byNotes / Links
1 hour

Cross-project discussions

Pamela Dragosh

Morgan Richomme  and Integration Team - can you please update the status of the generation of the JDK 11 Alpine images? The policy project is ready to finish migration and need that base image to proceed.

request to get repositories pending since end of November: issue tracked by https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-18325, mail resent to infra coordinator to get the repositories

Note: it will probably not be alpine + java11 as java11 is not officially supported by alpine yet (it would mean possible vulnerabilities associated with this non official support). The goal is to rely on the best openjdk11 solution, it means a maintained (vulnerabilities fixes), multi-arch, official distribution. So for me the best option is an official light java11 image + user onap.

E2E Network Slicing update (

Jira Legacy
showSummaryfalse
serverSystem Jira
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
keyREQ-158
) - LIN MENG/ Swaminathan Seetharaman

Portal SDK 2.6 migration status (David McBride/ Manoop Talasila)

  • Manoop says that supporting v2.6 back-end jar file is sufficient

LF IT Support

Sylvain Desbureaux

Gerrit Instability: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-18656

Testing EnvironmentDavid McBride

Windriver Lab Move status Yipan Deng / Stephen Gooch

  • Still on schedule (Jan 6 - 10)?
  • Do we need a backup plan for the project teams? 
  • Any issues?

Testing Improvement



CSIT Review



ToolChain Improvement



Documentation

Sofia Wallin

Submodule removal

  • Sofia to create execution plan, including timeline for each project to migrate. Present plan to PTL meeting, then seek approval from TSC.
  • Will be discussed further during documentation session at DDF in Prague

Other Improvement suggestion

David McBrideCompletion of El-Alto Retrospective ?

Subcommittee Updates for PTLs

Amy Zwarico

TSC approved known vulnerability remediation plan for El Alto: Remediating Known Vulnerabilities in Third Party Packages

Sharing Best Practices



IF TIME ALLOWS ....
15 minsRelease status

David McBride

Paweł Pawlak djhunt

Alla.Goldner

Stephen terrill

Hui Deng  Andy Mayer

Pamela Dragosh

5 minsUpcoming Events

Kenny Paul

Developer and Testing Forum, Prague, Jan 13 - 16

10 minsRemaining Action Items

David McBride

PTL Weekly ONAP12, Mon UTC 13:00


Zoom Chat Log 
Anchor
chat
chat


Action Items 
Anchor
action
action

  •  Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  •  Kenny Paul find slot at DDF for PTL meeting  
  •  Kenny Paul or Jessica Gonzalez - ensure that infra coordinator has access to IT JIRA
  •  David McBride and Manoop Talasila - clarify Portal SDK 2.6 migration requirements for M2/M3 vs M4
  •  Kenny Paul Jessica Gonzalez research gerrit http access requirtement history  
  •   Kenny Paul - add topic to TSC call to check status of Windriver lab move  
  •  Sofia Wallin - create proposal and timeline for migrating projects through submodule removal process.  Seek TSC approval for plan.