...
Threads | Time (s) | Speedup | Comments |
1 | 140.4 | 1.0 | |
2 | 71.6 | 2.0 | 2 threads is 2x faster than 1 thread |
3 | 48.5 | 2.9 | |
4 | 37.2 | 3.8 | |
5 | 31.0 | 4.5 | |
6 | 26.6 | 5.3 | |
7 | 23.8 | 5.9 | |
8 | 21.6 | 6.5 | |
9 | 20.0 | 7.0 | |
10 | 18.7 | 7.5 | 10 threads is 7.5x faster than 1 thread |
11 | 17.7 | 7.9 | |
12 | 16.8 | 8.4 | There are exactly 12 CPU cores (logical) on test machine |
13 | 16.7 | 8.4 | |
14 | 16.7 | 8.4 | |
15 | 16.8 | 8.4 | |
20 | 16.8 | 8.4 | |
30 | 16.7 | 8.4 | |
40 | 16.8 | 8.4 | |
50 | 16.7 | 8.4 |
Graphs
Observations
- There were no failures during the tests (e.g. timeouts or refused connections).
- Performance increases nearly linearly with increasing thread count, up to the number of CPU cores.
- Performance stops increasing when the number of threads equals the number of CPU cores (expected).
- Verbose statistics show that each individual request takes around 0.14 seconds, regardless of thread count (but with multiple CPU cores, requests are really done in parallel).
...