Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Jira No
SummaryDescriptionStatusSolution

ONAP 's evolution

Magnus's presentation invokes discussions in Archcom and in SECCOM.

SECCOM does not identify specific value in moving from subcommittee to Special Interest Group. We value fast decitsion making and execution on time.

ORAN defined ONAP core functions from their perspective. It cvould be a good baseline for us.

startedONAP security review questionnaire

In October the first application finished filling out our We went through first iteration of ONAP security review questionnaire, DCAE - ONAP Security Review Questionnaire Template

-3 x 1 hour sessions needed to go through the process.

-To be further discussed on how we should proceed with reviewing it.

Grade system usefullness to be discussed. Actions to follow up are valuableDL-Admin - name of DCAE repository.

General comment: answers are resonable.

ongoing

We

book the slot

are to provide feedback proposal in the

agenda for next week to collect feedback on Vijay's answers and questionnaire itself.

questionnaire by next SECCOM -December 13th.

Tony to open a ticket to LF IT on license expiration for Toggle Cloack and Cloack plugins (used for an additional description under "+" mark. - done IT-24912 - SOLVED


SECCOM Dashboard

Weekly scans re-enabled with Michal’s support:

-https://logs.onap.org/onap-integration/weekly/onap-weekly-dt-oom-kohn/2022-11/18_17-45/security/versions/versions.html




ONES NA summary

Multiple interesting presentations, SECCOM included. It was great to meet some of you in person!

Waivers policy was presented and discussed. We can not accept never ending waivers.




TSC meeting

TSC Chair voting process started – Pawel candidates

Discussion on supercommitter rights




SCA analysis

Automated NEXUS-IQ scans and recommendations for packages upgrades for London release. Work in progress.




SECCOM MEETING CALL WILL BE HELD ON 13th OF
December'22. 






...