...
| Jira No | Summary | Description | Status | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONAP's evolution | Magnus's presentation invokes discussions in Archcom and in SECCOM. SECCOM does not identify specific value in moving from subcommittee to Special Interest Group. We value fast decitsion making and execution on time. ORAN defined ONAP core functions from their perspective. It cvould be a good baseline for us. | started | ||
| ONAP security review questionnaire | In October the first application finished filling out our ONAP security review questionnaire, DCAE - ONAP Security Review Questionnaire Template -3 x 1 hour sessions needed to go through the process. -To be further discussed on how we should proceed with reviewing it. Grade system usefullness to be discussed. Actions to follow up are valuable. | ongoing | We book the slot in the agenda for next week to collect feedback on Vijay's answers and questionnaire itself. | |
| SECCOM Dashboard | Weekly scans re-enabled with Michal’s support: | |||
| ONES NA summary | Multiple interesting presentations, SECCOM included. It was great to meet some of you in person! Waivers policy was presented and discussed. We can not accept never ending waivers. | |||
TSC meeting | TSC Chair voting process started – Pawel candidates Discussion on supercommitter rights | |||
| SCA analysis | Automated NEXUS-IQ scans and recommendations for packages upgrades for London release. Work in progress. | |||
SECCOM MEETING CALL WILL BE HELD ON 13th OF |
Recordings:
SECCOM presentation: