Versions Compared
compared with
Key
- This line was added.
- This line was removed.
- Formatting was changed.
Drawio | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Key
Event 1 | Event 2 | |
---|---|---|
Owner | DMI ? | NCMP |
Repo & location | cps-events/src/main/resources/schemas/cps-async-request-response-event-schema.json * * this may change once ownership is established | cps-events/src/main/resources/schemas/cps-async-request-response-event-with-origin-schema.json |
Type | T1 = org.onap.???:async-request-response-event:v1 | T2 = org.onap.ncmp:async-request-response-event:v1 |
Schema | S1 = org.onap.???.async-request-response-event | S2 = org.onap.ncmp:async-request-response-event:v1 |
Producer | DMI | NCMP |
Consumer | NCMP | Client |
Questions
# | Issue | Answer |
---|---|---|
1 | Which application owns which schemas? | |
2 | Can different plugins use different schemas for event 1?! Alternatively maybe agree a base event which can be extended?! | |
3 | Where does the schemas reside exactly (related to #1) | |
4 | Does NCMP or DMI need to interpret the schema in any way?
| No |
5 | Should the eventSchema and eventType be the same in both events? (e.g. S1 & T1) | |
6 | What data exactly goes in the "event": { ... } blocks? |
Notes
# | Note |
---|---|
1 | Event ids are different between ncmp-dmi and dmi-ncmp |
2 | Correlation event id remains the same for auditing |
Overview
View file | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|