Page Comparison

Table of Contents

Jira Legacy

server	System Jira
columnIds	issuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
columns	key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId	4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176
key	CPS-731

...

Issue

Notes

Decision

1

Does request body need to declare "publicCmHandleProperties"?

Do we need to explicitly declare "publicCmHandleProperties"?

Will there be another possible variation to this in the future?

Code Block

language	yml

{
  "publicCmHandleProperties" : {
          "Colour": "red",
          "Size": "large"
   }
}

Yes

2

Are public properties always stored (in postgress) in the format of "name" : x, "value": y?

(does NOT affect implementation)

In the fragment table there are example that follow this format

Code Block

language	yml

{
	"name": "Colour",
	"value": "red"
},
{
	"name": "Size",
	"value": "large"
}

Yes. But all this is hidden when using CpsPath type query

3

Will there only ever be 1 kv pairs in public properties (in the DB)?

Yes, as each property is stored in a separate list-item Fragment
But all this is hidden when using CpsPath type query

4

Does the order matter?

Does

Code Block

language	yml

{
  "publicCmHandleProperties" : {
          "Colour" : "green",
          "Size" : "small"
   }
}

==

Code Block

language	yml

{
  "publicCmHandleProperties" : {
          "Size" : "small"
          "Colour" : "green",
     }
}

No
But all this is hidden when using CpsPath type query

5

Should search be case sensitive?

depend on CPSPath functionality - may be case-sensitive

https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-cps/en/latest/cps-path.html

Yes, that is the currently implement as such CpsPath type query. Given it is mostly machine-to-machine type queries this is good enough and performs better

6

What format should the response take?

We have two options currently:

Return List<String>

Code Block

language	yml

[
    "cmHandle1",
    "cmHandle2",
    ...,
    "cmHandleN"
]

2. Return CM Handle Objects

1. Already defined in CPS
2. <Example Pending>

Contact Tony Finnerty & kieran mccarthy regarding this.
Tony Finnerty Has no opinion on this matter

7

what if we have valid entries and one entry is empty?

We would return all cm handles and others that match would be included in this list anyway.

→ To avoid this should we first check the entries int map for empty entries as further processing is unnecessary in this case.

Discussed with Toine Siebelink and implementation changes are required for handling edges cases. we will handle empty and unknown properties separately.

8

Regarding empty/missing property in request

e.g.

{

    "publicCmHandleProperties": {
        "": "doesnt matter "
    }
}

Do we want to throw an exception if there is an empty property?

Do we silently ignore them and move on?

should we send two lists back... one with matching cm handles and one with those that failed processing?

...

#

URI

Design Notes

Comment(s)

1

POST /ncmp/v1/data/ch/searches

Scenario : Request received to return all cm handles matching properties given
Method : POST
URI : {ncmpRoot}/ncmp/v1/data/ch/searches
Header : Content-Type: application/json

Request Body

Code Block

language	yml

{
  "publicCmHandleProperties" : {
     "Colour" : "green",
     "Size" : "small"
   }
}

Response Body Example 1

Code Block

language	yml

[
	"cmHandle1",
	"cmHandle2",
	...,
	"cmHandleN"
]

...

Code Block

language	sql
title	insert sql
collapse	true

INSERT INTO public.fragment (xpath, "attributes") VALUES('/dmi-registry/cm-handles[@id=''PNFDemo'']/public-properties[@name=''Contact'']', '{"name": "Contact", "value": "newemailforstore@bookstore.com"}');
INSERT INTO public.fragment (xpath, "attributes") VALUES('/dmi-registry/cm-handles[@id=''Bookstore4'']/public-properties[@name=''color'']', '{"name": "color", "value": ""}');
INSERT INTO public.fragment (xpath, "attributes") VALUES('/dmi-registry/cm-handles[@id=''Bookstore3'']/public-properties[@name=''color'']', '{"name": "color", "value": "red"}');
INSERT INTO public.fragment (xpath, "attributes") VALUES('/dmi-registry/cm-handles[@id=''Bookstore2'']/public-properties[@name=''Contact'']', '{"name": "Contact", "value": "newemailforstore2@bookstore.com"}');
INSERT INTO public.fragment (xpath, "attributes") VALUES('/dmi-registry/cm-handles[@id=''Bookstore1'']/public-properties[@name=''Contact'']', '{"name": "Contact", "value": "newemailforstore@bookstore.com"}');

URL

http://localhost:8883/ncmp/v1/data/ch/searches

Results - Happy Path

#

Scenario

Request

Response

1

Both properties match

(Return CM Handles that Match)

{
    "publicCmHandleProperties": {
        "Contact": "newemailforstore@bookstore.com"
    }
}

[
"Bookstore1",
"PNFDemo"
]

2

No properties given

(Return CM Handles that Match which contain public properties)

{

"publicCmHandleProperties": {
}
}

[
    "Bookstore4",
    "Bookstore1",
    "Bookstore2",
    "Bookstore3",
    "PNFDemo"
]

Results - Edge Cases

#	Scenario	Request	Response
1	Value doesn't match (Nothing Returned)	{ "publicCmHandleProperties": { "Contact": "notAValidValuewont match" } }	[ ]
2	Unknown properties given (Return Empty Response)	{ "publicCmHandleProperties": { "UnknwnProperty": "doesnt matter" } }	[ ]
3	Empty property (invalid) (BAD_REQUEST)	{ "publicCmHandleProperties": { "": "doesnt matter " } }	{ "status": "400 BAD_REQUEST", "message": "Invalid data", "details": "Missing property - please supply a valid property" }
4	Empty value (valid) (Return CM Handles Returned that Match)	{ "publicCmHandleProperties": { "color": "" } }	[ "Bookstore4" ]

Future Example (Out-of-scope)

...

Versions Compared

Old Version 53

New Version 54

Key

Results - Happy Path

Results - Edge Cases

Future Example (Out-of-scope)