Proposed meeting logistics:

...

• Bruno:
  • 1) in ETSI-NFV alignment, does the implementation imply no Helm Charts are included? A: no implementation yet
  • 2) how to support cluster selection among several compute resources? A: the helm charts can support them
• Shitao:
  • a lot of commonalities between ASD and ETSI models, info shared at Comments to ASD proposal
• Thinh:
  • clarify if the analysis is individual contribution? A: yes
• Cristina:
  • it's good to have the discussion on the merge, but in principle the 2 approaches are different
• Bruno:
  • merge of the models and merge of the orchestration methods are seperate topics
  • it would be good if we can have single model and orchestration methods in the industry
  • ask why Thinh is negative on having single model/orchestration method?
    • Marian: philosophy are different for ASD and VNFD
  • whether the info captured in ASD should be added into the VNFD
• Hui:
  • agree with Bruno that we could have another session to further discuss the proposals, involving more ETSI delegates
  • there are many commonalities between the two models, not suggesting ONAP to copy the models while just changing the names
• Kuno:
  • Because network information as Virtual Link is very important for telecom application, how to describe these network information by ASD and how/who can connect VNF to operator network which had several issue in past in ETSI-NFV? What is different concept between ASD and VNFD when consider these network aspects ?
  • What/How ASD can ensure backward comapatibility concept or mechanism?
• Bruno:
  • suggest to use the gotomeeting bridge for another session
  • 4. Is the ASD really technology independent? there are several references to K8S in the IM
  • 5. You said ASD will support the CNF direct model. Can you elaborate on this?
  • 6. Will the changes made to SOL004 be proposed to ETSI? Will the new 5G non-MANO-artifact be registered?