General Information:
- Date and Time: 2021, Oct 18, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
- Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/97595070639?pwd=ajFTZGdlTmRVNjU5MSt1YVpycmlrdz09
- Meeting Recording:
- Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
- Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
- Model Proposals
- ETSI CNF support - ? minutes
- PNF instance model - ? minutes
- CPS model - 0 minutes
- Topology model - ? minutes
- Modeling Documentation - 0 minutes
...
- Model proposals:
- Modeling requirements:
- Related information:
- Clean/Approved models:
- Model Specification:
...
- Agenda bashing
- Model Proposals
- ETSI support for CNF model
- R9 DM proposal: https://wikilf-onap.onapatlassian.orgnet/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=9301177216463007
- aligned with SOL001 v4.2.1, package format is still under discussion
- will ask for approval after SOL001 v4.2.1 is stable
- a proposal of updating the information model documentation is planned in R9
- Updates:
- Fred presents the latest progress: a wiki page on IFA011 v4.2.1 changes, ETSI IFA011 v4.2.1 Changes to ONAP Resource Model.
- intention: update from v4.1.1 to v4.2.1
- adding of VipCpdProfile, VipCpLevel, LcmCoordinationActionMapping classes, and related changes
- introducing vnfdExtInvariantId at the vnfd
- add two attributes in VipCpd: intVirtualLinkDesc, dedicatedIpAddress
- name change of volumeTemplate → perVnfcInstance (in virtualStorageDesc)
- papyrus changes already submitted by Fred
- R9 DM proposal: https://wikilf-onap.onapatlassian.orgnet/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=9301177216463007
- 5G service / CPS model
- PNF instance model
- reverse engineering
- feedback to A&AI team:
- some relationship lack description, and the existing description may not be meaningful enough
- current status: AAI Schema Reverse-Engineering to Papyrus
- feedback to A&AI team:
- reverse engineering
- Topology model
- Proposal: https://wikilf-onap.onapatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/DW/Abstract+Topology+Model
- Martin will update the models with the IM sketch
- Model Sketch: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposed+Topology+IM+Sketch
- inspired by TAPI model to add "link", "connection" classes
- looking at ORAN use cases and see if the models can fulfill the requirements
- TAPI presentation may be found here: otcc2019.KS.002_TAPI_Concepts_Topology_Connectivity.pptx
- Latest updates:
- Tony provides some comments on the model sketch:
- simplify the "service" models
- relationship between the topology model and ONAP IM / root model
- currently working on high level concepts, discussing whether we need to have certain objects in the ONAP IM, and maybe part of the topology model
- e.g., Connectivity, EndPoint
- from developer's perspective, suggest to avoid too many hops to access the models/info
- intent part needs further discussion, and suggest to focus on aspects first
- Model discussed during the meeting (for the abstract models)
- will continue discussion next week
- updated proposal from Andy:
- Tony has updated the "ownership" section of the model adding ManagementPurpose attribute to the resource class (composed of ManagementReferenceRole and ManagementPurpose parts)
- Andy commented that management aspects should be discussed seperately and keep simple
- LayerParameter session
- Andy commented to add 0..N association to the diagram
- Topology grouping session
- Andy suggested to add examples
- Tony provides some comments on the model sketch:
- Proposal: https://wikilf-onap.onapatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/DW/Abstract+Topology+Model
- ETSI support for CNF model
- Modeling Documentation
- gendoc template discussion:
- whether the description only applies for a navigatable end of an association
- add relationship documentation to the UML guideline:
Jira Legacy server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key ONAPMODEL-28 - UML principle wiki page:
- Principle and Guideline for Information Model Proposal Using Papyrus (Draft)
- review the updates to the Gendoc requirements part
- Michela suggest whether it's possible to add information of associations into the class definitions
- Xu will investigate it offline
- Michela suggest whether it's possible to add information of associations into the class definitions
- Using Papyrus for Modeling updates
- gendoc template discussion: