...
In the figure above, five participants are shown. A Configuration Perisistence Participant manages Control Loop Elements that interact with the ONAP Configuration Persistence Service to store common data. The DCAE Participant runs Control Loop Elements that manage DCAE microservices. The Kubernetes Participant hosts the Control Loop Elements that are managing the life cycle of microservices in control loops that are in a Kubernetes ecosystem. The Policy Participant handles the Control Loop Elements that interact with the Policy Framework to manage policies for control loops. A Controller Participant such as the CDS Participant runs Control Loop Elements that load metadata and configure controllers so that they can partake in control loops. Any third party Existing System Participant can be developed to run Control Loop Elements that interact with any existing system (such as an operator's analytic, machine learning, or artificial intelligence system) so that those systems can partake in control loops.
4.
...
Concepts and Relationships on CLAMP Control Loops
...
Zu Qiang Section for us to work ont he TOSCA in here.
5. Concepts and Relationships on CLAMP Control Loops
6. REST interfaces
...
5. Design and Implementation
The design and implementation of TOSCA Control Loops in CLAMP is described in the following pages
- Defining Control Loops in TOSCA for CLAMP
- REST APIs for CLAMP Control Loops
- The CLAMP Control Loop Participant Protocol
| Warning |
|---|
This page is updated for Istanbul to this point, the information below this point may or may not be correct for Istanbul. |
1.1: Class Diagrams
1.1.1 Design Time
| Drawio | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.1.2 Runtime
Comment
| Drawio | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.2: ERD
| Drawio | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2: Control Loop Modelling
Joseph O'Leary to pad out this section
node_templates which makes up the loop itself.
Applications can be a DCAE microservice, an operational policy, or any other application as long as it can be modeled, and the targeted ecosystem to has a participant client waiting for the event distributions from CLAMP via DMaaP Message Router.
2.1: Control Loop TOSCA file definition
2.1.1 Control Loop Component Definition
A Control Loop Component that can be part of a control loop, it defines the components that partake in a control loop, and are implemented at run time by participants. The control loop component definition is truly dynamic and, as long as the participant that the control loop component definition relates to understands its definition, it can be anything. However, we have designed a base control loop component attribute that's generic and that can act as a good starting point.
| Code Block | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
node_types:
org.onap.CL_Component:
properties:
component_name:
type: string
description: Human readable name for the component.
required: true
provider:
type: string
description: Provider of the component and of the descriptor.
required: true
component_version:
type: string
description: Software version of the component.
required: true
resource_id:
type: string
description: >The ID of the resource,
should be provided if the resource was uploaded to the entity's inventory already.
required: false
resource_content:
type: string
description: the contents of the component resource, to be uploaded during commssioning phase of loop.
required: false
monitoring_policy:
type: string
description: A reference to the monitoring policy if applicable.
required: false
version: 0.0.1
derived_from: tosca.nodes.Root |
2.1.2 Loop Definition
The loop definition is explicit in the node_templates within the topology_template, a Control Loop node template is specified and any node tempalte specified in the Control Loop node tepolcate is part of the control loop managed by CLAMP.
| Warning |
|---|
The below example doesn't explicitly include any order, ordering of control loop execution is to be considered in the future which likely would lead to changes to this |
| Code Block | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
tosca_definitions_version: tosca_simple_yaml_1_3
data_types:
onap.datatypes.ToscaConceptIdentifier:
derived_from: tosca.datatypes.Root
properties:
name:
type: string
required: true
version:
type: string
required: true
node_types:
org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.Participant:
version: 1.0.1
derived_from: tosca.nodetypes.Root
properties:
provider:
type: string
requred: false
org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.ControlLoopElement:
version: 1.0.1
derived_from: tosca.nodetypes.Root
properties:
provider:
type: string
requred: false
participant_id:
type: onap.datatypes.ToscaConceptIdentifier
requred: true
org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.ControlLoop:
version: 1.0.1
derived_from: tosca.nodetypes.Root
properties:
provider:
type: string
requred: false
elements:
type: list
required: true
entry_schema:
type: onap.datatypes.ToscaConceptIdentifier
org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.DCAEMicroserviceControlLoopElement:
version: 1.0.1
derived_from: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.ControlLoopElement
properties:
dcae_blueprint_id:
type: onap.datatypes.ToscaConceptIdentifier
requred: true
org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.PolicyTypeControlLoopElement:
version: 1.0.1
derived_from: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.ControlLoopElement
properties:
policy_type_id:
type: onap.datatypes.ToscaConceptIdentifier
requred: true
org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.CDSControlLoopElement:
version: 1.0.1
derived_from: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.ControlLoopElement
properties:
cds_blueprint_id:
type: onap.datatypes.ToscaConceptIdentifier
requred: true
topology_template:
node_templates:
org.onap.dcae.controlloop.DCAEMicroserviceControlLoopParticipant:
version: 2.3.4
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.Participant
type_version: 1.0.1
description: Participant for DCAE microservices
properties:
provider: ONAP
org.onap.policy.controlloop.MonitoringPolicyControlLoopParticipant:
version: 2.3.1
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.Participant
type_version: 1.0.1
description: Participant for DCAE microservices
properties:
provider: ONAP
org.onap.policy.controlloop.OperationalPolicyControlLoopParticipant:
version: 3.2.1
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.Participant
type_version: 1.0.1
description: Participant for DCAE microservices
properties:
provider: ONAP
org.onap.ccsdk.cds.controlloop.CdsControlLoopParticipant:
version: 2.2.1
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.Participant
type_version: 1.0.1
description: Participant for DCAE microservices
properties:
provider: ONAP
org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_DCAEMicroservice:
version: 1.2.3
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.DCAEMicroserviceControlLoopElement
type_version: 1.0.0
description: Control loop element for the DCAE microservice for Performance Management Subscription Handling
properties:
provider: Ericsson
participant_id:
name: org.onap.dcae.controlloop.DCAEMicroserviceControlLoopParticipant
version: 2.3.4
dcae_blueprint_id:
name: org.onap.dcae.blueprints.PMSHBlueprint
version: 1.0.0
org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_MonitoringPolicyControlLoopElement:
version: 1.2.3
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.PolicyTypeControlLoopElement
type_version: 1.0.0
description: Control loop element for the monitoring policy for Performance Management Subscription Handling
properties:
provider: Ericsson
participant_id:
name: org.onap.policy.controlloop.PolicyControlLoopParticipant
version: 2.3.1
policy_type_id:
name: onap.policies.monitoring.pm-subscription-handler
version: 1.0.0
org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_OperationalPolicyControlLoopElement:
version: 1.2.3
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.PolicyTypeControlLoopElement
type_version: 1.0.0
description: Control loop element for the operational policy for Performance Management Subscription Handling
properties:
provider: Ericsson
participant_id:
name: org.onap.policy.controlloop.PolicyControlLoopParticipant
version: 2.3.1
policy_type_id:
name: onap.policies.operational.pm-subscription-handler
version: 1.0.0
org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_CDS_ControlLoopElement:
version: 1.2.3
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.ControlLoopElement
type_version: 1.0.0
description: Control loop element for CDS for Performance Management Subscription Handling
properties:
provider: Ericsson
participant_Id:
name: org.onap.ccsdk.cds.controlloop.CdsControlLoopParticipant
version: 3.2.1
cds_blueprint_id:
name: org.onap.ccsdk.cds.PMSHCdsBlueprint
version: 1.0.0
org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSHControlLoopDefinition:
version: 1.2.3
type: org.onap.policy.clamp.controlloop.ControlLoop
type_version: 1.0.0
description: Control loop for Performance Management Subscription Handling
properties:
provider: Ericsson
elements:
- name: org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_DCAEMicroservice
version: 1.2.3
- name: org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_MonitoringPolicyControlLoopElement
version: 1.2.3
- name: org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_OperationalPolicyControlLoopElement
version: 1.2.3
- name: org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_CDS_ControlLoopElement
version: 1.2.3
|
2.1.3 Example of two Control Loop instances
| Code Block | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
{
"controlLoops": [
{
"name": "PMSHInstance0",
"version": "1.0.1",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSHControlLoopDefinition",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "PMSH control loop instance 0",
"elements": [
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-d21eb79c6c20",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_DCAEMicroservice",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "DCAEParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "DCAE Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 0 control loop"
},
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-d21eb79c6c21",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_MonitoringPolicyControlLoopElement",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "PolicyParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "Monitoring Policy Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 0 control loop"
},
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-d21eb79c6c22",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_OperationalPolicyControlLoopElement",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "PolicyParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "Operational Policy Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 0 control loop"
},
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-d21eb79c6c23",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_CDS_ControlLoopElement",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "CDSParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "CDS Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 0 control loop"
}
]
},
{
"name": "PMSHInstance1",
"version": "1.0.1",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSHControlLoopDefinition",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "PMSH control loop instance 1",
"elements": [
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-e21eb79c6c24",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_DCAEMicroservice",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "DCAEParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "DCAE Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 1 control loop"
},
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-e21eb79c6c25",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_MonitoringPolicyControlLoopElement",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "PolicyParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "Monitoring Policy Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 1 control loop"
},
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-e21eb79c6c26",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_OperationalPolicyControlLoopElement",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "PolicyParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "Operational Policy Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 1 control loop"
},
{
"id": "709c62b3-8918-41b9-a747-e21eb79c6c27",
"definition": {
"name": "org.onap.domain.pmsh.PMSH_CDS_ControlLoopElement",
"version": "1.2.3"
},
"participantId": {
"name": "CDSParticipant0",
"version": "1.0.0"
},
"state": "UNINITIALISED",
"orderedState": "UNINITIALISED",
"description": "CDS Control Loop Element for the PMSH instance 1 control loop"
}
]
}
]
}
|
2.2: Modelling from TOSCA to Commissioned Data in Run Time Inventory
| Drawio | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.3: Modelling from TOSCA to Instance Data Run Time Inventory
2.4: Swagger REST APIs for Control Loop
ControlLoop Runtime Swagger REST APIs:
ControlLoop_Runtime_Swagger_API.yml
Participant Swagger REST APIs:
3: APIs and Sequence Diagrams
3.1: Commissioning
Ajay Deep Singh to pad out this section
This section defines Commissioning/CRUD Operations that can be performed on ControlLoops.
A Client, in this case CLAMP, can perform CRUD operations or can commission ControlLoops from DesignTime to RunTime Inventory Database.
DesignTime/RunTime Catalogue/Inventory Database stores ControlLoop definitions, CRUD operations on database supported by REST Endpoints like Get, Delete, Create allowing selection of a particular ControlLoop to be addressed, below sequence diagram will help you understand flow how a client(Clamp) application can initiate Rest call for performing different operations on Database.
API_Gateway Service is for interacting to different database DesignTime/RunTime and should be responsible for responding success or failure status on different operations.
The commissioning of ControlLoops definition from DesignTime Catalogue to RunTime Inventory Database can we achived using the commissioning Rest Endpoint, in this process when a rest request is initiated from a client(Clamp) the API_Gateway Service take cares of fetching ControlLoops metadata from DesignTime and creates in RunTime Inventory Database, Commissioning API ControlLoop Sequence diagram will help you understand the flow.
| Warning |
|---|
In future commissioning Rest Endpoint might be updated to push ControlLoops not only in RunTime Database but to the participants involved in ControlLoop. |
3.1.1: Commissioning REST API
| Code Block | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
openapi: 3.0.3
info:
description: >-
The ControlLoop Commissioning API allows users to search and perform
CRUD action on Controlloop Tosca exported data sets.
version: 1.0.0
title: Control Loop Commissioning API
license:
name: Apache 2.0
url: 'http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0'
contact:
email: lego@est.tech
servers:
- url: '{scheme}://onap/controlloop/v2/'
variables:
scheme:
description: 'The Data Set API is accessible via https and http'
enum:
- 'https'
- 'http'
default: 'http'
tags:
- name: Control Loop
description: Commissioning API
- name: design-catalogue
description: CRUD actions on an designtime Control Loop data sets.
- name: runtime-inventory
description: CRUD actions on an runtime Control Loop data sets.
paths:
/design-catalogue/loops:
get:
tags:
- design-catalogue
operationId: getAllLoopsUsingGET
summary: Returns a list of all available Control Loops.
responses:
'200':
description: OK
content:
application/yaml:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
/design-catalogue/loop/{controlLoopId}:
get:
tags:
- design-catalogue
summary: >-
Returns a specific control loop.
description: >-
This GET API returns a specific control loop.
operationId: getLoopByIdUsingGET
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: 'Id of the control loop.'
required: true
example: "org.onap.PM_CDS_Blueprint"
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
content:
application/yaml:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
delete:
tags:
- design-catalogue
summary: Delete a specific Control Loop by ID.
operationId: deleteLoopByIdUsingDELETE
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: Identity for the control loop
required: true
style: simple
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
'404':
description: Control Loop not present
post:
tags:
- design-catalogue
summary: >-
Accepts a Tosca Service Template representing a Control Loop.
description: >-
This API Create a Control Loop.
operationId: createLoopWithIDUsingPOST
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: Identity for the control loop
required: true
style: simple
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
'409':
description: Control Loop already exist.
put:
tags:
- design-catalogue
summary: Updates a Control Loop.
operationId: updateLoopWithIDUsingPUT
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: Identity for the control loop
required: true
style: simple
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
'404':
description: Control Loop not found
/runtime-inventory/commission:
post:
tags:
- runtime-inventory
summary: >-
Commissions Tosca Service Template in RunTime Inventory.
description: >-
This API commissions Tosca Service Template in RunTime Inventory DB.
operationId: commissionLoopWithPOST
responses:
'200':
description: OK
'404':
description: No matching record found for the given criteria.
/runtime-inventory/loop/{controlLoopId}:
get:
tags:
- runtime-inventory
summary: >-
Returns a specific control loop.
description: >-
This GET API returns a specific control loop.
operationId: getLoopByIdUsing
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: 'Id of the control loop.'
required: true
example: "org.onap.PM_CDS_Blueprint"
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
content:
application/yaml:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
delete:
tags:
- runtime-inventory
summary: Delete a specific Control Loop by ID.
operationId: deleteLoopByIdUsing
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: Identity for the control loop
required: true
style: simple
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
'404':
description: Control Loop not present
post:
tags:
- runtime-inventory
summary: >-
Accepts a Tosca Service Template representing a Control Loop.
description: >-
This API Create a Control Loop.
operationId: createLoopWithIDUsing
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: Identity for the control loop
required: true
style: simple
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
'409':
description: Control Loop already exist.
put:
tags:
- runtime-inventory
summary: Updates a Control Loop.
operationId: updateLoopWithIDUsing
parameters:
- name: controlLoopId
in: path
description: Identity for the control loop
required: true
style: simple
schema:
type: string
responses:
'200':
description: OK
'404':
description: Control Loop not found
components:
schemas:
ControlLoop:
title: ControlLoop
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
ControlLoop:
type: string
|
3.1.2: Commissioning Sequence Diagrams
GET, DELETE, CREATE API ControlLoop Sequence Diagram
Commission API ControlLoop Sequence Diagram
3.2: Instantiation
Robertas Rimkus to pad out this section
This section refers to Instantiation of a Commissioned control loop. A client, in this case CLAMP (potentially DCAEMOD, etc in the future) will render the commissioned control loops allowing selection of a particular control loop to be instantiated. User will then provide the configurations needed to instantiate the selected control loop which will be sent onto the CL_Instance_Control Service. The service will then distribute the configurations to DMaaP topic. Participants (agents) will pull the event containing the config and pick out their control loop components to be instantiated and start/set up those particular components. CL_Instance_Control Service will be waiting for a response back from all participants involved in the instantiation of the control loop, in regards to the state of instantiation. In successful response case the service will store the CL Instance LCM (Life Cycle management) data into the runtime DB as well as providing a message back to the client of the successful instantiation. In failure to receive the response case, a timeout will be called, which will result in a teardown event being sent to DMaaP. The participants will then receive the event and proceed to teardown the components that were instantiated or check that they have failed to instantiate in the first place and send a Teardown ACK back to the CL_Instance_Control Service. No CL Instance LCM data will be stored and a message indicating failure to instantiate the CL along side with the error will be sent back to the client (CLAMP).
3.2.1: Instantiation REST API
| Code Block | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
openapi: 3.0.3
info:
title: Swagger Control Loop Instantiation
description: ""
version: 1.0.0
servers:
- url: '{scheme}://onap/controlloop/v2/'
variables:
scheme:
description: 'The Data Set API is accessible via https and http'
enum:
- 'https'
- 'http'
default: 'http'
tags:
- name: instantiate
description: Control Loop Instantiation
paths:
/runtime-inventory/instantiate:
post:
tags:
- instantiate
summary: Instantiate a commissioned control loop
operationId: instantiateLoop
requestBody:
description: Control loop that is to be instantiated
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
required: true
responses:
200:
description: OK
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ApiResponse'
404:
description: No Control Loop found
405:
description: Invalid input
/runtime-inventory/loops/instantiated:
get:
tags:
- instantiate
summary: Get a list of instantiated control loops
responses:
200:
description: Success
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
404:
description: No instantiated control loops found
/runtime-inventory/loops/instantiated/{loop-id}:
get:
tags:
- instantiate
summary: Get an instantiated control loop by id
parameters:
- name: loop-id
in: path
description: ID of instantiated loop to return
required: true
schema:
type: string
responses:
200:
description: OK
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
404:
description: Control Loop not found
put:
tags:
- instantiate
summary: Update an instantiated control loop
parameters:
- name: loop-id
in: path
description: ID of instantiated loop
required: true
schema:
type: string
requestBody:
description: Control loop to be updated
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
required: true
responses:
200:
description: OK
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/ControlLoop'
404:
description: Control Loop not found
delete:
tags:
- instantiate
summary: Delete an instantiated control loop
parameters:
- name: loop-id
in: path
description: ID of instantiated loop
required: true
schema:
type: string
responses:
200:
description: OK
404:
description: Control Loop not found
components:
schemas:
ControlLoop:
title: ControlLoop
type: object
properties:
id:
type: string
controlLoopTosca:
type: string
ApiResponse:
type: object
properties:
code:
type: integer
format: int32
status:
type: string |
3.2.2: Instantiation Sequence Diagrams
3.2.3: Instantiation DMaaP API
Initial Thought for an event to be sent from CL_Instance_Control onto DMaaP for Participants to consume. The event would go onto an output topic which the Participants would be polling/subscribed to
e.g url : https://{{ONAPIP}}:{{DMaaPPort}}/events/CL_INSTANCE_CONTROL_OUTPUT
| Code Block | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
{
"instance-id":"myCLInstance1",
"action":"INSTANTIATE",
"configurations":[
{
"participant-id":"Participant_DCAE",
"applications":[
{
"application-id":"example.pmsh",
"config":{
}
},
{
"application-id":"example.dfc",
"config":{
}
}
]
},
{
"participant-id":"Participant_Policy",
"applications":[
{
"application-id":"example.OperationalPolicy",
"config":{
}
}
]
}
]
} |
*Preferred solution is to send TOSCA in the body. Meaning we could reuse the parsing code which is already present and provide it to the participant.
3.2.4: Instantiation Participant API
*Suggestion was to put JAVA API code in this section for the participant talking to DMaaP. TBD
3.3: Monitoring
In this case it refers to monitoring the data that the participants will provide to DMaaP. Participants will send events to DMaaP which will be pulled by the CL_Supervision_Service in to the runtime database. Monitoring service provides APIs to display the statistics data from runtime database to the Monitoring GUI. The data provided should include a reference id to the control loops that are instantiated on the participant, as well as the applications that have been instantiated as a part of that control loop for that participant. Data should also include the time that the application has started, state of it (running/terminated) and any other critical information which would help to determine the health of an instantiated control loop and its components. Idea is for the participant to provide events every certain period of time, similar to a health-check, in order to provide consistent monitoring.
3.3.1: Monitoring REST API
| Code Block | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
openapi: 3.0.3
info:
title: Swagger Control Loop Monitoring
description: ""
version: 1.0.0
servers:
- url: '{scheme}://onap/controlloop/v2/'
variables:
scheme:
description: 'The Data Set API is accessible via https and http'
enum:
- 'https'
- 'http'
default: 'http'
tags:
- name: monitoring
description: Control Loop Monitoring
paths:
/runtime-inventory/monitoring:
post:
tags:
- monitoring
summary: Input monitoring data into the database
requestBody:
description: Monitoring data to be input
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/MonitoringData'
required: true
responses:
200:
description: OK
405:
description: Invalid input
get:
tags:
- monitoring
summary: Get monitoring data for all participants
responses:
200:
description: Success
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/MonitoringData'
404:
description: No monitoring data found
/runtime-inventory/monitoring/{participant-id}:
get:
tags:
- monitoring
summary: Get monitoring data for a participant by participant id
parameters:
- name: participant-id
in: path
description: ID of a participant
required: true
schema:
type: string
responses:
200:
description: OK
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/MonitoringData'
404:
description: Monitoring data for the participant not found
put:
tags:
- monitoring
summary: Update monitoring data for a participant by participant id
parameters:
- name: participant-id
in: path
description: ID of a participant
required: true
schema:
type: string
requestBody:
description: Monitoring data to be updated
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/MonitoringData'
required: true
responses:
200:
description: OK
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/MonitoringData'
404:
description: Monitoring data for the participant not found
delete:
tags:
- monitoring
summary: Delete monitoring data for a participant by participant id
parameters:
- name: participant-id
in: path
description: ID of a participant
required: true
schema:
type: string
responses:
200:
description: OK
404:
description: Monitoring data for the participant not found
components:
schemas:
MonitoringData:
properties:
participant-id:
type: string
control-loops:
type: array
items:
properties:
cl-instance-id:
type: string
applications:
type: array
items:
properties:
application-id:
type: string
status:
type: string
enum:
- INSTANTIATION_STARTED
- INSTANTIATED_RUNNING
- INSTANTIATED_FAILED
other-data:
type: string |
3.3.2: Monitoring Sequence Diagrams
3.3.3: Monitoring DMaaP API
Participants will send an event containing monitoring data to a DMaaP topic at a set interval after participant has received an event to instantiate a control loop
e.g url: https://{{ONAPIP}}:{{DMaaPPort}}/events/CL_MONITORING_SERVICE_INPUT
| Code Block | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
{
"timestamp":"1605689254",
"participant-id":"Participant_DCAE",
"control-loops":[
{
"instance-id":"myCLInstance1",
"applications":[
{
"application-id":"example.pmsh",
"status":"INSTANTIATION_STARTED"
},
{
"application-id":"example.dfc",
"status":"INSTANTIATION_STARTED"
}
]
},
{
"instance-id":"myCLInstance2",
"applications":[
{
"application-id":"example.pmsh",
"status":"INSTANTIATED"
}
]
}
]
} |
3.3.4: Monitoring Participant API
Presume similar thinking to Instantiation Participant API
*Suggestion was to put JAVA API code in this section for the participant talking to DMaaP. TBD
3.4: Supervision
Supervision is responsible for ensuring that
- control loops are established once their initiation has been ordered
- control loops are running correctly once their initiation is completed
- control loops are correctly removed once their removal has been ordered
3.4.1: Supervision Sequence Diagrams
3.4.2: Supervision APIs to other components
4: Design
4.1: Server Side
4.1.1 Database Schema and JPA
4.1.2: TOSCA Processing
4.1.3: Instance Control
4.1.4: Execution Monitoring
4.2: Participant Side
Participant is a component that acts as a bridge between Runtime and components like Policy-framework, DCAE, Kubernetes cluster etc.
It listens to Dmaap to receive messages from runtime and performs operations towards control loop components.
Every participant has two parts Participant-Intermediary and a Participant-Impl.
Participant-Intermediary is a common component that listens to Dmaap and acts on the messages, participant-impl handles the logic towards
control loop element.
4.2.1: Participant Message handling
Participant handles 4 types of messages
...
2. Control Loop Update: This message creates the control loop elements and brings them from UNINITIALIZED to PASSIVE state.
ControlLoopUpdate message contains full ToscaServiceTemplate describing all components participating in a control loop.
This acts as a template for any control loop to be created according to the template.
When participant-intermediary receives this message, it triggers creation of policy-types and policies in Policy-Framework by Policy-Participant,
and deploys DCAE from DCAE-participant
3. Control Loop State change: This message is used to order a state change in control loop element.
Runtime can order one of the following ordered states.
UNINITIALIZED : The control loop or control loop element should become uninitialized on participants, it should not exist on participants.
PASSIVE : The control loop or control loop element should initialized on the participants and be passive, that is,
it is not handling control loop messages yet.
RUNNING : The control loop or control loop element should running and is executing control loops. Once any of above states are ordered, then control loop element transitions into
UNINITIALIZED : The control loop or control loop element is not initialized on participants, it does not exist on participants.
UNINITIALIZED2PASSIVE : The control loop or control loop element is changing from uninitialized to passive,
it is being initialized onto participants.
PASSIVE : The control loop or control loop element is initialized on the participants but is passive, that is, it is not
handling control loop messages yet.
PASSIVE2RUNNING : The control loop or control loop element is changing from passive to running,
the participants are preparing to execute control loops.
RUNNING : The control loop or control loop element is running and is executing control loops.
RUNNING2PASSIVE : The control loop or control loop element is completing execution of current control loops but
will not start running any more control loops and will become passive.
PASSIVE2UNINITIALIZED : The control loop or control loop element is changing from passive to uninitialized,
the control loop is being removed from participants
4. Participant Healthcheck: This message is used to learn the health status of a participant.
As a response to any of the above message participant returns a Participant Status message, holding respective message response.
Runtime receives Participant Status message and stores relevant information in database, Or performs respective actions.
4.2.2: Policy Participant Agent
Policy participant receives messages through participant-intermediary common code, and handles them by invoking REST APIs towards policy-framework.
For example, When a ControlLoopUpdate message is received by policy participant, it contains full ToscaServiceTemplate describing all components
participating in a control loop. When the control loop element state changed from UNINITIALIZED to PASSIVE, Policy-participant triggers creation
of policy-types and policies in Policy-Framework.
When the state changes from PASSIVE to UNINITIALIZED, Policy-Participant deletes the policies, policy-types by invoking REST APIs towards policy-framework.
4.2.4: DCAE Participant Agent
DCAE participant receives messages through participant-intermediary common code, and handles them by invoking CLAMP DCAE methods,
which internally work towards DCAE.
For example, When a ControlLoopUpdate message is received by DCAE participant, it contains full ToscaServiceTemplate describing all components
participating in a control loop. When the control loop element state changed from UNINITIALIZED to PASSIVE, DCAE-participant triggers deploy
of DCAE.
When the state changes from PASSIVE to UNINITIALIZED, DCAE-Participant un-deploys DCAE by invoking methods towards CLAMP.
4.2.5: Kubernetes Participant Agent
...
2.4: Swagger REST APIs for Control Loop
ControlLoop Runtime Swagger REST APIs:
ControlLoop_Runtime_Swagger_API.yml
Participant Swagger REST APIs:
3: APIs and Sequence Diagrams
3.1: Commissioning
Ajay Deep Singh to pad out this section
This section defines Commissioning/CRUD Operations that can be performed on ControlLoops.
A Client, in this case CLAMP, can perform CRUD operations or can commission ControlLoops from DesignTime to RunTime Inventory Database.
DesignTime/RunTime Catalogue/Inventory Database stores ControlLoop definitions, CRUD operations on database supported by REST Endpoints like Get, Delete, Create allowing selection of a particular ControlLoop to be addressed, below sequence diagram will help you understand flow how a client(Clamp) application can initiate Rest call for performing different operations on Database.
API_Gateway Service is for interacting to different database DesignTime/RunTime and should be responsible for responding success or failure status on different operations.
The commissioning of ControlLoops definition from DesignTime Catalogue to RunTime Inventory Database can we achived using the commissioning Rest Endpoint, in this process when a rest request is initiated from a client(Clamp) the API_Gateway Service take cares of fetching ControlLoops metadata from DesignTime and creates in RunTime Inventory Database, Commissioning API ControlLoop Sequence diagram will help you understand the flow.
| Warning |
|---|
In future commissioning Rest Endpoint might be updated to push ControlLoops not only in RunTime Database but to the participants involved in ControlLoop. |
3.1.1: Commissioning REST API
3.1.2: Commissioning Sequence Diagrams
GET, DELETE, CREATE API ControlLoop Sequence Diagram
Commission API ControlLoop Sequence Diagram
3.2: Instantiation
Robertas Rimkus to pad out this section
This section refers to Instantiation of a Commissioned control loop. A client, in this case CLAMP (potentially DCAEMOD, etc in the future) will render the commissioned control loops allowing selection of a particular control loop to be instantiated. User will then provide the configurations needed to instantiate the selected control loop which will be sent onto the CL_Instance_Control Service. The service will then distribute the configurations to DMaaP topic. Participants (agents) will pull the event containing the config and pick out their control loop components to be instantiated and start/set up those particular components. CL_Instance_Control Service will be waiting for a response back from all participants involved in the instantiation of the control loop, in regards to the state of instantiation. In successful response case the service will store the CL Instance LCM (Life Cycle management) data into the runtime DB as well as providing a message back to the client of the successful instantiation. In failure to receive the response case, a timeout will be called, which will result in a teardown event being sent to DMaaP. The participants will then receive the event and proceed to teardown the components that were instantiated or check that they have failed to instantiate in the first place and send a Teardown ACK back to the CL_Instance_Control Service. No CL Instance LCM data will be stored and a message indicating failure to instantiate the CL along side with the error will be sent back to the client (CLAMP).
3.2.1: Instantiation REST API
3.2.2: Instantiation Sequence Diagrams
3.2.3: Instantiation DMaaP API
Initial Thought for an event to be sent from CL_Instance_Control onto DMaaP for Participants to consume. The event would go onto an output topic which the Participants would be polling/subscribed to
e.g url : https://{{ONAPIP}}:{{DMaaPPort}}/events/CL_INSTANCE_CONTROL_OUTPUT
*Preferred solution is to send TOSCA in the body. Meaning we could reuse the parsing code which is already present and provide it to the participant.
3.2.4: Instantiation Participant API
*Suggestion was to put JAVA API code in this section for the participant talking to DMaaP. TBD
3.3: Monitoring
In this case it refers to monitoring the data that the participants will provide to DMaaP. Participants will send events to DMaaP which will be pulled by the CL_Supervision_Service in to the runtime database. Monitoring service provides APIs to display the statistics data from runtime database to the Monitoring GUI. The data provided should include a reference id to the control loops that are instantiated on the participant, as well as the applications that have been instantiated as a part of that control loop for that participant. Data should also include the time that the application has started, state of it (running/terminated) and any other critical information which would help to determine the health of an instantiated control loop and its components. Idea is for the participant to provide events every certain period of time, similar to a health-check, in order to provide consistent monitoring.
3.3.1: Monitoring REST API
3.3.2: Monitoring Sequence Diagrams
3.3.3: Monitoring DMaaP API
Participants will send an event containing monitoring data to a DMaaP topic at a set interval after participant has received an event to instantiate a control loop
e.g url: https://{{ONAPIP}}:{{DMaaPPort}}/events/CL_MONITORING_SERVICE_INPUT
3.3.4: Monitoring Participant API
Presume similar thinking to Instantiation Participant API
*Suggestion was to put JAVA API code in this section for the participant talking to DMaaP. TBD
3.4: Supervision
Supervision is responsible for ensuring that
- control loops are established once their initiation has been ordered
- control loops are running correctly once their initiation is completed
- control loops are correctly removed once their removal has been ordered
3.4.1: Supervision Sequence Diagrams
3.4.2: Supervision APIs to other components
4: Design
4.1: Server Side
4.1.1 Database Schema and JPA
4.1.2: TOSCA Processing
4.1.3: Instance Control
4.1.4: Execution Monitoring
4.2:
4.3: Client Side
4.3.1: Client SDK: Composition of Control Loop Tosca
...