Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents
maxLevel3
minLevel2
exclude1

...

Role

Name
(must use @ macro )

Linux Foundation Login (LFID)

Email Address 
(if different from @ macro)

PTLJessica Gonzalezjwagantall
CommittersBengt Thuree (Unlicensed)bthuree

Andrew Grimbergagrimberg

Eric Balleball

Morgan Richommemrichomme

bgrzybowski

Lasse Kaihlavirtakaihlavi

Project & Release History

  • How long the project has been an active:  This repo has been active since launch and as recent as 2017-01-24
  • Release Participation:   ci-management uses lftoolsm All ONAP releases. 
  • Engagement levels for past releases (up to 3): 
    • Commits per Release:  described below
    • Contributors per Release: described below
    • Companies per release: described below
  • Use Cases:  CI-management is responsible for every other repo's CI/CD operations.

Statistics taken from https://insights.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/

Architecture Alignment:

  • N/A

Artifact Information:

  • ci-management uses lftools, global-jjb and common-packer releases to stay up to date. This includes:
  • Engagement levels for past releases (up to 3): 
    • Commits per Release:  ci-management on its own does not generate releases, but it reflects releases from lftools, global-jjb and common-packer
    • Contributors per Release: LFRELENG
    • Companies per release: The Linux Foundation and, for the past month (since Dec 2020), Orange and Samsung 
  • Use Cases:  CI-management is responsible for every other repo's CI/CD operations.

Architecture Alignment:

  • N/A

Artifact Information:

  • There are no artifacts produced from the configuration hosted in this repo

Other Information:

  • ci-management is the core of every single ONAP repo's CICD workflow. At the moment, there are no ONAP repos in existence that manages their releases without the use of ONAP's Jenkins system.