...
Jira No | Summary | Description | Status | Solution | Honolulu non functional requirements - presentation to Requirements Subcommittee | SECCOM requirements were presented on 26th of October.
| done | Prioritization will be done by TSC. With Fabian we made a SIEM requirement. | CLAMP for flows documentation provided by Pierre. | It is clear for Fabian but insufficient. | ongoing | Offline exchanges to be organized next week on (4th of November?) between Fabian and Fabien/Pierre. | Harbor integration | Requirements for Harbor to be provided to Jessica and use Jenkins sandbox. Internal meetings to be organized by Fabian with his team and come back to SECCOM with 2 features utilization idea:
| in standby |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Java and Python upgradeSecrets management |
Which secrets are specified during the deployment - to be addressed with operators. | ongoing | Script must be written to collect requested information on secrets used. Looking at CII Badging answers in this area. ONAP security requirements was also covering this area (master keys). Krzysztof to be contacted as Samsung team worked on this topic in the past. Amy to check Sonatype outputs in this area. | ||||||||||||
Flow matrix | Discussion point: Natacha initiated Wiki page: | ongoing | |||||||||||||
Guilin version highlights |
| ongoing | Ideas to be further shared by SECCOM team. | ||||||||||||
SECCOM requirement for ONAP maintenance release | "Any critical, severe or high vulnerability found in the code written by the project team MUST be fixed within 60 days or prior to the inclusion of the project in a new release, whichever occurs first" | done | No specific comments received from SECCOM. | ||||||||||||
Harbor integration follow-up | Errors with demo server experienced by Jess. | ongoing | To be further checked on Harbor with exchanges between Fabian and Samuli. | ||||||||||||
Whitesource configuration to | Do we recomment to run Whitesource next to Nexus-IQ? We have to choose one. We might want to evaluate both for a Honolulu time frame to recommend the final one. One of the criterias could be possibility to export CVEs into the excel file. | ongoing | We recommend trial period to run both tools to compare and recommend the ultimate one. | ||||||||||||
Java and Python latest scans | There is abuild time test that checks the images to see if they have Python 2 (interpreter) 115 vs. 61 (Pythons 3) or Java 8 (runtime) (63 vs. 55 in Java 11) included in the image. We still have lots of components that have those in their image. Problem statement: It does not answer the question whether projects are using now only Python 3 and Java 11. In multiple cases people are using custom images and simply did not remove Python 2 and Java 8 as not used. Standard image does not have old versions in it, we shall push projects to use standard image for Honolulu release and if from some reason they need to run custom image, they must remove what they do not use. | Amy will reach out Pawel W. to run some additional tests. | Synch on latest recommended versions | Some projects made a great job , some did nothing. We shall push TSC for prioritization of this task. | ongoing | CII badging requirement | Requirement to be updated. | ongoing | Tony to update Jira Epic Amy had exchanges with Pawel W. Scripts updates are needed. Base images would not use Wiki to be used for results posting - David to be contacted by Amy. E-mail to be sent to onap-discuss on that by Amy. | ||||||
Honolulu non functional requirements | SECCOM requirement provided after the deadline (16th of October):
| done | Prioritization will be done by TSC. With Fabian we made a SIEM requirement. | ||||||||||||
OOM tests | Weak cyphers could be tested. | To be follow-up with OOM team - Amy and Tony to discuss together. | |||||||||||||
CII Dashboard | 3 projects that are silver now:, and even one of those projects is 65% of gold (VVP) and 2 other are at 57 % of gold (Policy) and AAF, CLAMP is 96% silver and over 40 % gold. | ongoing | Progress was made. | SIEM requirement | To be added as it is mature: Implementation is done to identify events that compromise the system. This information feedback is done because only an intervention can stop this risk. The events are logged and according to rules have intervened according to the risks. External system must be use to save and display the log Secure protocol must be use to transfert the log between ONAP and external system | doneto be shared with the next PTLs call. | |||||||||
OUR NEXT SECCOM MEETING CALL WILL BE HELD ON 3rd 10th OF NOVEMBER'20. | Secrets management by NatachaHarbor discussion. |
Recording:
View file | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
SECCOM presentation:
View file | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|