...
- Committer diversity - prefer 3 or more companies represented; if only 2, then need diversity in companies contributing
- S3P requirements not considered as gating for "mature" phase
- "Mature" phase criteria are more about projects being "active"
Presentation shared at TSC meeting.
| View file | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Recordings of the working group meetings:
maturity_rvw_working_group_20200721.mp4
maturity_rvw_working_group_20200722.mp4
| Project Name | Recommended Disposition on moving from incubation to mature (approve, decline, revert) | Comments (for approve: improvements that could be made, for decline: steps needed to get to approve, for revert: information needed for recommendation) |
|---|---|---|
| AAI | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible |
| CCSDK | approve | continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc. |
CLAMP | decline | strong project, but need to improve company diversity in both committers and contributors |
| CLI | decline | need participation in the most recent release; need to document architecture review |
| DCAE | approve | continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc. |
| DMaaP | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review |
| External API Framework | approve | improve wiki documentation on release content; continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc. |
| Holmes | decline | need participation in the most recent release; need to increase contributor and committer diversity; need recent architecture review |
| Modeling | approve | |
| MSB | revert | please add information on contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of MSB by operators or others |
| MultiCloud | revert | please add information on contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of MultiCloud by operators or others |
| ONAP Portal | decline | need to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee; please add information on deployment/use of ONAP Portal by operators or others |
| OOF | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review for any components not already reviewed (CMSO?) |
| Policy Framework | approve | |
| SDC | approve | conduct a more current architecture review with a focus on overlap of DCAE-D with DCAE-MOD. |
| SDNC | revert | please add information on test coverage and contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of SDNC by operators or others |
| SO | approve | please add information on test coverage; please add information on deployment/use of SO by operators or others |
| Usecase UI | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible |
| VFC | revert | please address all questions in the comments; also ensure that all committers are active |
| VNFSDK | revert | please document the review with the architecture subcommittee; please ensure that all committers are active |
| VVP | decline | need to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee; |
...