General Information:
- Date and Time: 2020, June 8th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
- Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/97595070639
- Meeting Recording:
- Meeting Chat Log:
Agenda:
- Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
- Modeling Process discussion - 5 minutes
- Model Proposals - 40 30 minutes
- allotted resource - 20 0 minutes
- ETSI alignment - 20 0 minutes
- 5G RAN service - 0 minutes
- CNF - 0 minutes
- Geolocation - 0 minutes
- PNF instance model - 0 minutes
- Modeling Documentation & Glossary- 10 minutesModeling Process discussion - 5 minutes
Material:
- Allotted Resource Revised
- Allotted Resource Model Review Comments
- Allotted Resource for Network Slicing
- 5G RAN SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION in R6 Frankfurt
- Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling
- ONAP R7 Modeling High Level Requirements
...
- Agenda bashing
- Model Proposals
- allotted resource
- continue discussion of runtime model
ETSI alignment - geolocation model:
- start with the "place" class in the root model
- discussions have been taken to identify the attributes
- referenced TMF GB922 place model
- Andy: suggest to provide information as required by the information element template (see the last bullet for the template)
- next step: create UML class objects
- Modeling Documentation
- R6 readthedocs review: https://onap-doc.readthedocs.io/projects/onap-modeling-modelspec/en/latest/index.html
- add relationship documentation to the UML guideline:
Jira Legacy server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key ONAPMODEL-28 - discuss next week
- Modeling Process
- Ben is working on the working process for the use case team, finished M2, start M3 part
- continue the discussion from the Benefit part
- add integration and standardization
- add "information element template" bullet to the M0 process
- Generic Information Element Template
- the template has referenced things from the use case template
- Q: is the information element (mentioned in the template) expected to be a UML class? A: hopefully, but there is no constraints
- Model WoW and Interaction Chart (process diagram update)
- next step:
- present in the next DDF
- final review and adoption? cross-check with use case and arc teams?