Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
5min

Admin

Martin SkorupskiUpdate ONAP Calendar with Kenny Paul
Update: Email send out - here is an overview of the issue:
No feedback yet: create LF ticket ...

5min
KAPIL SINGAL

Copyright header

Intellij Copyright plugin 

Reference: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/copyright.html

Copyrights and License Declarations

10min
As Dan reported,

Code Coverage dropped from 56% to 38%, where ONAP Guideline is maintain minimum of 55% code coverage.

https://sonarcloud.io/code?id=onap_ccsdk-features&selected=onap_ccsdk-features%3Asdnr

Martin Skorupski This is expected for the "wireless technologies" (wt) parts as the functional implementation just ended and now the test coverage implementation has started.

30minlatency

Melanie Sater

Structure of the Problem

Different needs for latency based on scope, project, use case...

Different standards involved

RAN topology of tomorrow

  • user plane
  • control-plane
  • m-plane

Martin Skorupski Add modified slide set

Optimization on UE and/or service level


Structure of the latency use cases

  • Where to measure?
  • What is measured?
  • How is it measured?


Latency measurement

  • for data-plane
    • UE: ping 1.1.1.1 
      ... will measure IMCP through host 1.1.1.1
  • for control plane
    • UE: eastablich a new data connection
      measure the time between the request and the success response
  • for management plane
    • SMO: perform a well defined SET operation
      measure the time until the VES message for configChange is recieved by DMaaP




...