Versions Compared

Version Old Version 1 New Version 2
Changes made by

Martin Skorupski

Martin Skorupski

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
5min

Admin

Martin Skorupski

Martin SkorupskiUpdate ONAP Calendar with Kenny Paul
Update: Email send out - here is an overview of the issue:
No feedback yet: create LF ticket ...

10min5min
KAPIL SINGAL

In addition to copyright header, wanted ‘SONAR Code Coverage’ added to agenda.

10min

KAPIL SINGAL

As Dan reported, Code Coverage dropped from 56% to 38%, where ONAP Guideline is maintain minimum of 55% code coverage.

https://sonarcloud.io/code?id=onap_ccsdk-features&selected=onap_ccsdk-features%3Asdnr

30minlatency

Melanie Sater

Structure of the Problem

Different needs for latency based on scope, project, use case...

Different standards involved

RAN topology of tomorrow

  • user plane
  • control-plane
  • m-plane

Martin Skorupski Add modified slide set

Optimization on UE and/or service level


Structure of the latency use cases

  • Where to measure?
  • What is measured?
  • How is it measured?


Latency measurement

  • for data-plane
    • UE: ping 1.1.1.1 
      ... will measure IMCP through host 1.1.1.1
  • for control plane
    • UE: eastablich a new data connection
      measure the time between the request and the success response
  • for management plane
    • SMO: perform a well defined SET operation
      measure the time until the VES message for configChange is recieved by DMaaP




...