Page Comparison

General Information:

• Date and Time: 2020, Jan 13th, 10pm~11pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
• Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
• Meeting Recording:  
• Meeting Chat Log:  
  

Attendees:

Agenda:

• Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
  • items for checking:
    
    • ves spec
    • PNF instance model
    • modeling glossary update
• allotted resource comment addressing  - 30 minutes
• Modeling Process discussion - 25 minutes

Material:

• Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling
• Modeling sub-committee Contributions
• Allotted Resource Revised
• New PNF example

...

• Agenda bashing:
  • VES specification
    • the owner of the spec is retired, no plans for further updates yet
    • the spec is not considered stable, and the existing changes are minor (only impact some relationship names)
    • thus updating of the VES models is not urgent, would postpone to next release (if VES spec is finalized)
  • PNF instance model 
    • no discussion
  • Modeling glossary update
    • AP:Kevin has updated the gendoc template and add Stereotype back to the GenDoc script
    • Ben will contact Sofia to see if U/C teams should contribute to the glossary
    • there's an issue on who will host the glossary, doc team vs modeling team
      • Andy and Kevin will join doc team call later this week for further discussion
    • if the modeling team hosts the glossary, further issues would need to be discussed
      • what's the structure of the glossary, i.e., whether need to have sub-model categories
      • level of details
      • acronyms
• Discussed items:
  • allotted resource 
    • Kevin would discuss with Gil on the comments:
      • provide U/C
      • ANFD and ANFI attributes addition
      • differentiate NFInstance and NFDesc classes
      • add description for ANF Instance/ANFDRunsOnSharableNFDesc/ANFInstanceRunsOnSharableNFInstance
      • clarify ANFDRunsOnSharableNFDesc/ANFInstanceRunsOnSharableNFInstance relationship
      • clarify how to use Anfd
    • additional comments
    Modeling Process discussion
    • discuss next week
  • Modeling Process discussion
    • no discussion
  • license model
    • Kevin will look at email comments
    • according to the process, technical comments would be addressed in next version of the model (similar to dynamic parameter case), needs decision of modeling subcommittee on how to proceed with the proposal

RECORDING

...