Date
Attendees
...
VID & R6 U/C Discuss
...
Use Case Teams
...
Discussion with VID PTL (Ittay Stern) for R6 Use Case Impacts discussion and commitments for VID impacting Use Cases
Preparing slides for Use Cases at the Technical Conference Antwerp (for 5G/PNF use cases)
...
...
...
Discussion with A&AI PTL (Jimmy Forsyth) and Chandra Cinthala for R6 A&AI Use Case Impacts discussion and commitments.
Use Case Realization Call: September 25, 2019
...
...
...
R6 M1 Deadline (Oct 10 2019)
M1 Checklist: Deliverables for Planning Milestone Checklist Template
READ THE DOCS: http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guides/onap-developer/developing/index.html > USER GUIDES > Verified Use Cases
and discussion with A&AI (James Forsyth ) continuing discussion from Sept 25.
Network Slicing has two proposals in R6 (LIN MENG CMCC and Swaminathan Seetharaman ). Need to align the two proposals and present at Use Case S/C meeting (Alla G.) and TSC and Architecture next week Oct 14.
...
...
Combination Plugfest & PoC 1st week of December bringing together subset of ONAP modules as SMO (svc mgmt orchestration) layer w/ other artifacts from ORAN S/W (LF). LF will publicize. Planned June 2020.
Co-Demo discussion Nokia & Ericsson: Plug Fest Planning Discussion Oct 28, 2019
...
...
...
Discussion of the RunTime DB Use Case in R6 Frankfurt which introduces a Common Service Data Layer for a data lake to store configuration and operational parameters.
Component & Flows:
ARC RunTime DB Component Description - R6 Frankfurt
ARCHCOM: InfoFlow - RunTime Config DB Information Flow
...
...
Discussion with OOF PTL (Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan ) for R6 Use Case Impacts discussion and technical details for OOF impacting Use Cases
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Discussion with Controller (APP-C, SDN-C) PTL (Dan Timoney) for R6 Use Case Impacts to Controller project. A technical discussion, Q&A, and U/C analysis.
...
...
...
Filling out, describing and creating the Wiki for a Use Case
Use Case Tracking Template and Use Case Template
Proposed Functional Template for Use Cases
...
Discussion with David McBride of the Linux Foundation, the R6 Release Manager regarding practices, wiki page updates, Jira dashboard and what is a use case?
Frankfurt Release Requirements
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
...
- ff
- f
- f
- f
- f
- f
DISCUSSION ITEMS LOG
...
Pltfm
...
PLATFORM TOPICS:
Controller to NF Association
...
...
R5/R6 Topic
See Slides Nov 6, 2018. Development of Controller to NF assignment association S/W.
CDS, VF-C, APP-C, SDN-R, SDN-C; will the CCSDK "merging" of controllers happen in R6?
USE CASE REALIZATION MEETING (Notes 2018-11-6) Ctrl-NF
...
PLATFORM TOPICS:
Data Persistency, RunTime DB
...
...
STATUS: Work for RunTime DB completed, not merged in R4
Dan Timoney moved to R5, one Jira for RunTime DB. One issue about merging.
ONAP code added can take a test ONAP deployment to have the ConfigDB work.
USE CASE REALIZATION MEETING (Notes 2019-01-30) U/C Cross-Interaction, Persistency
...
PLATFORM TOPICS:
Controller LCM API Evolution
...
...
...
- Target is common LCM API in CCSDK usable by different controller personas to simplify for both clients and controller implementations
- Support PNFs for applicable LCM operations in a consistent way
- Enable use of CDS blueprint processor to customize behavior of LCM operations in the 'self-service' category
- In ONAP R4, CDS can be used for pre/post-instantiation configuration. Generic and model-driven design should allow CDS usage to be extended for additional operations and use cases.
- Evolution steps that preserve backwards compatibility for clients
Present at the Arch S/C Apr 9 (Tue) second presentation.
...
USE CASE/5G:
RAN (ORAN-3GPP) Standards harmonization with ONAP
...
...
- Orchestration at the Edge.
- A1/O1/E2 communications. Edge to ENBs, Telemetry.
- E2 will not have this info. O1 is I/F for PM counts. Not a management I/F.
- WG3 (ORAN) is defining this.
- ONAP w/ O1. Changes w/ O1 interface.
- How to satisfy A1/O1 and in what time-frame.
- U/C ORAN - ONAP harmonization. 3GPP ORAN ONAP.
- Starting a new U/C in 5G. Marge, Vimal, Fred Feisullin
- Edge inventory & topology. Transport BH consideration w/ real-time near-RT aspects
- Akraino. MEC. Edge automation (Ramki).
Use Case WIKI: MOBILITY STANDARDS HARMONIZATION WITH ONAP
...
USE CASE/5G:
Licensing Management
...
...
New U/C added to the 5G Use Cases for Licensing Management
Use case Wiki: LICENSING MANAGEMENT
(Oct 8 2019) Arch Samuli presented on Licensing Management. Object development. Modeling S/C.
Modeling work: ONAP R6 Modeling High Level Requirements
...
USE CASE/5G:
OOF / SON / PCI
...
...
PoC for December 2019?
SDN-R south-bound NetConf I/F w/ model
and also integration with Runtime DB work.
...
USE CASES:
BBS U/C Evolution
...
...
BBS Evolution - Slide set linked in R6 proposed U/C. List of proposals & functional requirements.
- Change Service - want to use ONAP platform.
- Full Closed Loop for Fault Management - CLAMP.
- Service Update API (SO) - will be developed
...
USE CASES/5G:
PM Dictionary/FM MD GUI
...
...
USE CASES/5G:
PNF S/W Upgrade
...
...
USE CASES/5G:
Preonboarding/Onboarding
...
...
IoT Service Creation
...
...
IoT Create Services on 5G
June 19, 2019
...
USE CASES:
...
...
Align & harmonize information models to ONAP model and ONAP internal information & data model:
ETSI SOL001 ... 007 with ONAP internal Model, PNFD modeling (Model S/C), 5G Model (3GPP, RAN), ORAN (WGs, RAN), Open ROADM (reconfig optical add/drop multiplexer, Optical), ONF (Optical), ISOMII (Optical), OTCC (Optical transport config & control)
...
USE CASES:
5G NRM (Network Resource Model) Configuration
...
June 2019 LFN DDF, titled as '5G Provisioning management service to NRM'
(Oct 9 2019) Presented at CDS team and discussed with Yuriy and Seshu; presented at Resource Modeling S/C. Slides will be updated and re-presented.
5G Network Resource Model (NRM) Configuration in R6 Frankfurt
...
Architecture S/C
PNF POB/OB Flow
...
...
Arch S/C Information Flows: Draft ONAP Information Flows
New Information flow for Preonboarding/Onboarding xNF packages/resources.
ARCHCOM: InfoFlow - Onboard Resource into SDC Flow
...
TSC:
PoC Definition
...
...
TSC/USE CASES:
Test Automation Progress
...
...
Use Case Test Automation
Action Items: Use case subcommittee to reach the Dublin use case owner to provide the following information. what's the current percentage of testing automation regarding your use case and functional requirements; what will be the plan to be 100% and constraints (resources availability etc.)
...
Need the U/C teams to fill out the Dev. Impacts.
More Generalized Use Case Template (discussed w/ Model team):
Use Case Tracking Template and Use Case Template
Frankfurt Release Requirements
KEY PRESENTATIONS & OVERVIEWS & RECORDINGS
List of U/C Realization calls from R6 U/C Wiki: Release 6 (Frankfurt) proposed use cases and functional requirements
...
...
- Target is common LCM API in CCSDK usable by different controller personas to simplify for both clients and controller implementations
- Support PNFs for applicable LCM operations in a consistent way
- Enable use of CDS blueprint processor to customize behavior of LCM operations in the 'self-service' category
- In ONAP R4, CDS can be used for pre/post-instantiation configuration. Generic and model-driven design should allow CDS usage to be extended for additional operations and use cases.
- Evolution steps that preserve backwards compatibility for clients
...
...
Visualizer for A&AI Model Layout
Use Case Realization Call: May 1, 2019
...
...
A&AI developer Model Browser to navigate and viewing attributes, object types & edge view
Recording & Slides: Use Case Realization Call: May 8, 2019
...
...
...
Central & Distributed Edge ONAP configuration.
Topics include: Onboarding, Instantiation, Edge Orchestration, A&AI, Architecture, Work-flows, Multi-Tenancy
Use Case Realization Call: May 22, 2019
...
...
Model S/C (Sub committee) contributions page: Modeling sub-committee Contributions
...
...
...
ONAP Read the Docs/R4 Announcements
WIKI: PNF software upgrade in R6 Frankfurt Overview & Presentation
...
...
...
...
...
...
Modeling S/C Process Wiki: Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling with Use Case Tracking Template and Use Case Template
R6 Modeling Req Plan wiki: ONAP R6 Modeling High Level Requirements
...
...
...
...
- Joanne Liu Rudel
- Gerard Hynes
- Dongho Kim
- Zu Qiang
- Melanie Sater
- DongRun
- Vimal Begwani
- Fari Behi
- Marci Haas
- Tracy Van Brakle
- N.K. Shankaranarayanan
- f
DISCUSSION ITEMS LOG
DISCUSSION ON PLUGFEST
QUESTION: Can we show things already Demoed? Yes. It is good to demo the "basic" stuff because the ORAN people in attendance are new to the ONAP use cases.
QUESTION: Who is the audience? ORAN (new members), ONAP. Held worldwide
QUESTION: How long will we have for each demo? 10 minutes, 5 min of Q&A, + a few minutes for logistics changing of demos.
QUESTION: New S/W Code, Demo R5/R6? No new S/W build is expected
QUESTION: Simulators vs Real DUs? Simulators can be used.
QUESTION: Timeline for development ends end of Oct/beginning of Nov? No new S/W is expected to be developed.
QUESTION: Slideware? Context, give Background. of the 10 min a few minutes to set the stage w/ slides. linkages to ORAN & ORAN S/W community. 3-4 slides Max. ORAN would request a separate break-out sessions for more information.
QUESTION: Commitment from Vendors?
- PNF PnP - Nokia ("basic PnP"); Oskar, Ericsson variant of PnP. Samsung; Comscope AirSpan Altiostar. Not all confirmed.
- Bulk PM - Ericsson (confirmed). Nokia (may demo).
- Basic Fault Flow - WG4 M-Plane Specification. NetConf notifications. O1 FM Data in VES Message format. SCNR development, grab message from DMaaP
- Basic Config Flow - Trigger from PNF from Portal; NetConf & VES. Martin Skorupski.
- WG4 Open FH - Simulators. MPlane. Two vendors tentative. Interwork with Beijing lab.
- SON/OOF/PCI - Two vendors tentative. Altiostar
QUESTION: Actual Demo Day? Thursday December 5, 2019. 10AM EST (USA GMT-5) to Noon.Interworking many labs. ONAP integration PTL Morgan Richomme .
- LOCATION: Rutgers WinLab (5G cosmos research foundation testbed)
- LOCATION: Orange Lab (Sofia Antipoli France).
- LOCATION: AT&T in Washington Redmond (USA).
- LOCATION: 5G Testbed in Murray Hill NJ (USA) Nokia.
- LOCATION: AT&T Bedminster.
QUESTION: Missing Page OOF/SON/PCI - will be added.
QUESTION: Is there a dedicated Wiki page yet? In O-RAN-SC OAM wiki and SDN-R wiki.
QUESTION: Co-Demoing - ok for multiple companies to demo, that is great, encourage. Good to show that multiple companies are involved in a use case, that there is interest and multiple streams of development.
- CO-DEMO LOGISTICS - want to have vendors have equal attention and don't run out of time.
QUESTION: NSF Power initiative (future).
QUESTION: Zoom, recording, Posted to ORAN, ONAP wiki.
QUESTION: Will there be a Panel Discussion? yes we are. details
QUESTION: Schedule - first two days for settings, setup. third day will be a demo day everyone is recording preparing slides.
QUESTION: In person F2F Logistics - details forthcoming. park. contact #s. Address.
QUESTION: What will be demonstrated for the WG4 Demo?
- Show real-equipment w/ WG4 M-Plane YANG files in ORAN S/W gerrit.
- based on NetConf & NetConf notifications.
- Question O1 I/F EMS to controller to EMS via NetConf this is still called O1 I/F?
- there is no EMS in the Opensource PoC. I/F from SDN-R to RU (not DU)
- Vendors starting to support.
- Differs from O1,
LINK TO PLUGFEST:
https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/display/OAM/Upcoming+PoC+-+week+of+December+2nd+2019
| Plug and Play Co-Demoing | Co-Demoing Companies: Ericsson, Nokia, CommScope Showing directly from OWL (Open Wireless Lab / 5G COSMOS) small VM without VPN Link OWL (5G COSMOS): https://cosmos-lab.org/ Size needed - 2-4 cores, 8GB of RAM, 100 GB Disk. What to Demo: Nokia would demonstrate the "basic" PnP flow (which was demonstrated a while ago) Then Ericsson would demonstrate the NetConf (Step 37) part. PnP PNF Onboarding Process in R5, show artifacts of an existing resource already onboard. use VID to trigger instantiation of service. Show via logs onboarded. Link to onboarding Demo Time Break-down: 45 min overall; 6 min overview slides "Spokesperson" Benjamin Cheung PnP w/ simulator (2 slides) 11 min per vendor (33 min): Nokia (Lead show base PnP), Ericsson (NetConf), Comscope 6 min for questions |
| Bulk PM Co-Demoing | Co-Demoing Companies: Ericsson, Nokia, CommScope & NEC What to Demo: Taking the lead to demonstrate basic Bulk PM. Nokia will show Bulk PM based on FTPES server. Demo Time Break-down: 55 min Overall 6 min overview slides "Spokesperson" Mark Scott or Oskar Malm (2 slides) 14.33 min per vendor (43 min) Ericsson (Lead) & Nokia, NEC 6 min for questions |
Basic Config Basic Fault | Co-Demoing Companies: Ericsson, Commscope, NEC What to Demo: Basic Fault/Basic Config Equipment vendors supporting O1 already support VES for FM data. Basic config 4 vendor support early version of O1 CM can say "support NetConf Yang" show config from controller. Demo Time Break-down: 20 min |
| OOF SON PCI | Co-Demoing Companies: AT&T, TBD What to Demo: (No Demo in this Plugfest) Show simplified version of OOF PCI w/ Comscope 1 cell. w/ R2 ONAP. Only used RAN simulator to now. Sending NC to Comscope will take development. Demo Time Break-down: |
| WG4 Demo | Co-Demoing Companies: Samsung What to Demo: WG4 would show basic config/fault Open-FH M-Plane style. Changing a value of a config setting on radio (RU), generate an alarm (receiving the fault) Demo Time Break-down: 10 minutes |
| Time & Planning | Rutgers (OWL) 18 min PnP > 45 min 22 min Bulk PM > 55 min (Mention) Basic Fault/Basic Config → (20 Min) 20min OOF SON > 20 min → 0 min (no Demo) 10min WG4 Open FH M-Plane > 10 min 20min buffer time, next steps, wrap-up, director of WINLAB > 20 min Each vendor should do Pre-recording (showing their full demo) as fall-backs. Trial Runs. Thu Dec 5 10AM-11:30AM EDT / Live. Rutgers WINLAB. Brunswick NJ Demo, Discussion in Morning. Panel in Afternoon. Demos would in Vendor Labs or in OWL. WINLAB. Director of WINLAB at the end. |
Demos in Parallel? Time Concern | Would it be possible to Demo in Parallel? Would that be possible? WebEx. Run Parallel webEx Recordings. Worthwhile, if it can be done smoothly. Time Concern. 9:00 - 11:30 instead (2.5 hours 150min) of 10-11:30 or 2-days instead of 1 day. |
| Panel Discussion | Auditorium in AT&T Middletown NJ, Thursday Afternoon 2-4 PM Videotaping. Widow display/Talking heads. Talking remotely. Video of demo. Questions posed by a moderator. Each representative from equipment vendors will get to answer. Local svc providers/operators. 3-4 questions > vendors (agree upon questions) operators 3-4 questions want moderator to ask. Who is moderator - Lindon Ong. (will ask if he can host). |
| Getting Access to the Labs | How to get Access to the Labs |
| https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/x/egBv Sophie Antipolis I believe is the town in France. I will look it up. |
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
| Document | File | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONAP ORAN Plug Slides |
| ||||||
| Plugfest Plug and Play Slides | |||||||
| Bulk PM | |||||||
RECORDING
| Recording | FILE |
|---|---|
| Zoom Video & Audio (MP4) | |
| Audio Only (M4A) | |
| Playback (M3U) | |
| Chat (Txt) |
...